Differentially private and decentralized randomized power method

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01931v3
• Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:09:37 GMT
• Title: Differentially private and decentralized randomized power method
• Authors: Julien Nicolas, César Sabater, Mohamed Maouche, Sonia Ben Mokhtar, Mark Coates,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes enhanced privacy-preserving variants of the randomized power method.<n>First, we propose a variant that reduces the amount of the noise required in current techniques to achieve Differential Privacy.<n>Second, we adapt our method to a decentralized framework in which data is distributed among multiple users.
• Score: 15.955127242261808
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The randomized power method has gained significant interest due to its simplicity and efficient handling of large-scale spectral analysis and recommendation tasks. However, its application to large datasets containing personal information (e.g., web interactions, search history, personal tastes) raises critical privacy problems. This paper addresses these issues by proposing enhanced privacy-preserving variants of the method. First, we propose a variant that reduces the amount of the noise required in current techniques to achieve Differential Privacy (DP). More precisely, we refine the privacy analysis so that the Gaussian noise variance no longer grows linearly with the target rank, achieving the same DP guarantees with strictly less noise. Second, we adapt our method to a decentralized framework in which data is distributed among multiple users. The decentralized protocol strengthens privacy guarantees with no accuracy penalty and a low computational and communication overhead. Our results include the provision of tighter convergence bounds for both the centralized and decentralized versions, and an empirical comparison with previous work using real recommendation datasets.

Related papers

• Improving Noise Efficiency in Privacy-preserving Dataset Distillation [59.57846442477106]
  We introduce a novel framework that decouples sampling from optimization for better convergence and improves signal quality.<n>On CIFAR-10, our method achieves a textbf10.0% improvement with 50 images per class and textbf8.3% increase with just textbfone-fifth the distilled set size of previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T13:15:52Z)
• Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: An Utility-Enhanced Approach [12.614480013684759]
  Federated learning has emerged as an attractive approach to protect data privacy by eliminating the need for sharing clients' data.<n>Recent studies have shown that federated learning alone does not guarantee privacy, as private data may still be inferred from the uploaded parameters to the central server.<n>We present a modification to these vanilla differentially private algorithms based on a Haar wavelet transformation step and a novel noise injection scheme that significantly lowers the bound of the noise variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T04:48:29Z)
• Differentially Private Random Feature Model [52.468511541184895]
  We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines. We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:31:08Z)
• Enhanced Privacy Bound for Shuffle Model with Personalized Privacy [32.08637708405314]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is an enhanced privacy protocol which introduces an intermediate trusted server between local users and a central data curator. It significantly amplifies the central DP guarantee by anonymizing and shuffling the local randomized data. This work focuses on deriving the central privacy bound for a more practical setting where personalized local privacy is required by each user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T16:11:56Z)
• Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy [7.264378254137811]
  Differential privacy (DP) can measure privacy loss by observing the changes in the distribution caused by the inclusion of individuals in the target dataset. DP has been prominent in safeguarding datasets in machine learning in industry giants like Apple and Google. We propose per-instance DP (pDP) as a constraint, measuring privacy loss for each data instance and optimizing noise tailored to individual instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T06:51:16Z)
• TernaryVote: Differentially Private, Communication Efficient, and Byzantine Resilient Distributed Optimization on Heterogeneous Data [50.797729676285876]
  We propose TernaryVote, which combines a ternary compressor and the majority vote mechanism to realize differential privacy, gradient compression, and Byzantine resilience simultaneously. We theoretically quantify the privacy guarantee through the lens of the emerging f-differential privacy (DP) and the Byzantine resilience of the proposed algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T16:41:14Z)
• Share Your Representation Only: Guaranteed Improvement of the Privacy-Utility Tradeoff in Federated Learning [47.042811490685324]
  Mitigating the risk of this information leakage, using state of the art differentially private algorithms, also does not come for free. In this paper, we consider a representation learning objective that various parties collaboratively refine on a federated model, with differential privacy guarantees. We observe a significant performance improvement over the prior work under the same small privacy budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T14:46:55Z)
• Samplable Anonymous Aggregation for Private Federated Data Analysis [25.35309084903802]
  Locally differentially private algorithms require little trust but are (provably) limited in their utility. Centrally differentially private algorithms can allow significantly better utility but require a trusted curator. Our first contribution is to propose a new primitive that allows for efficient implementation of several commonly used algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T17:19:37Z)
• Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with $f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
  We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability. We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP) More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z)
• On Differential Privacy for Federated Learning in Wireless Systems with Multiple Base Stations [90.53293906751747]
  We consider a federated learning model in a wireless system with multiple base stations and inter-cell interference. We show the convergence behavior of the learning process by deriving an upper bound on its optimality gap. Our proposed scheduler improves the average accuracy of the predictions compared with a random scheduler.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T03:37:11Z)
• Differentially Private Vertical Federated Clustering [13.27934054846057]
  In many applications, multiple parties have private data regarding the same set of users but on disjoint sets of attributes. To enable model learning while protecting the privacy of the data subjects, we need vertical federated learning (VFL) techniques. The algorithm proposed in this paper is the first practical solution for differentially private vertical federated k-means clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-02T19:23:48Z)
• Muffliato: Peer-to-Peer Privacy Amplification for Decentralized Optimization and Averaging [20.39986955578245]
  We introduce pairwise network differential privacy, a relaxation of Local Differential Privacy (LDP) We derive a differentially private decentralized optimization algorithm that alternates between local gradient descent steps and gossip averaging. Our results show that our algorithms amplify privacy guarantees as a function of the distance between nodes in the graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T13:32:35Z)
• Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Inherent Privacy Protection [103.62463469366557]
  Decentralized optimization is the basic building block of modern collaborative machine learning, distributed estimation and control, and large-scale sensing. Since involved data, privacy protection has become an increasingly pressing need in the implementation of decentralized optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T14:38:23Z)
• Network Shuffling: Privacy Amplification via Random Walks [21.685747588753514]
  We introduce network shuffling, a decentralized mechanism where users exchange data in a random-walk fashion on a network/graph. We show that the privacy amplification rate is similar to other privacy amplification techniques such as uniform shuffling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T08:36:06Z)
• Graph-Homomorphic Perturbations for Private Decentralized Learning [64.26238893241322]
  Local exchange of estimates allows inference of data based on private data. perturbations chosen independently at every agent, resulting in a significant performance loss. We propose an alternative scheme, which constructs perturbations according to a particular nullspace condition, allowing them to be invisible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T10:35:35Z)
• Coded Stochastic ADMM for Decentralized Consensus Optimization with Edge Computing [113.52575069030192]
  Big data, including applications with high security requirements, are often collected and stored on multiple heterogeneous devices, such as mobile devices, drones and vehicles. Due to the limitations of communication costs and security requirements, it is of paramount importance to extract information in a decentralized manner instead of aggregating data to a fusion center. We consider the problem of learning model parameters in a multi-agent system with data locally processed via distributed edge nodes. A class of mini-batch alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithms is explored to develop the distributed learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T10:41:59Z)
• Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Ins [38.72327434015975]
  Differentially Private Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) forms a fundamental building block in many applications for learning over sensitive data. In this paper, we focus on conducting iterative methods like DP-SGD in the setting of federated learning (FL) wherein the data is distributed among many devices (clients) Our main contribution is the emphrandom check-in distributed protocol, which crucially relies only on randomized participation decisions made locally and independently by each client.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T18:14:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.