Enhancing Risk Assessment in Transformers with Loss-at-Risk Functions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02558v1
- Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 19:44:43 GMT
- Title: Enhancing Risk Assessment in Transformers with Loss-at-Risk Functions
- Authors: Jinghan Zhang, Henry Xie, Xinhao Zhang, Kunpeng Liu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel loss function, the Loss-at-Risk, which incorporates Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) into Transformer models.
This integration allows Transformer models to recognize potential extreme losses and further improves their capability to handle high-stakes financial decisions.
We conduct a series of experiments with highly volatile financial datasets to demonstrate that our Loss-at-Risk function improves the Transformers' risk prediction and management capabilities.
- Score: 3.2162648244439684
- License:
- Abstract: In the financial field, precise risk assessment tools are essential for decision-making. Recent studies have challenged the notion that traditional network loss functions like Mean Square Error (MSE) are adequate, especially under extreme risk conditions that can lead to significant losses during market upheavals. Transformers and Transformer-based models are now widely used in financial forecasting according to their outstanding performance in time-series-related predictions. However, these models typically lack sensitivity to extreme risks and often underestimate great financial losses. To address this problem, we introduce a novel loss function, the Loss-at-Risk, which incorporates Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) into Transformer models. This integration allows Transformer models to recognize potential extreme losses and further improves their capability to handle high-stakes financial decisions. Moreover, we conduct a series of experiments with highly volatile financial datasets to demonstrate that our Loss-at-Risk function improves the Transformers' risk prediction and management capabilities without compromising their decision-making accuracy or efficiency. The results demonstrate that integrating risk-aware metrics during training enhances the Transformers' risk assessment capabilities while preserving their core strengths in decision-making and reasoning across diverse scenarios.
Related papers
- Enhancing Data Quality through Self-learning on Imbalanced Financial Risk Data [11.910955398918444]
This study investigates data pre-processing techniques to enhance existing financial risk datasets.
We introduce TriEnhance, a straightforward technique that entails: (1) generating synthetic samples specifically tailored to the minority class, (2) filtering using binary feedback to refine samples, and (3) self-learning with pseudo-labels.
Our experiments reveal the efficacy of TriEnhance, with a notable focus on improving minority class calibration, a key factor for developing more robust financial risk prediction systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T16:59:15Z) - Data-Adaptive Tradeoffs among Multiple Risks in Distribution-Free Prediction [55.77015419028725]
We develop methods that permit valid control of risk when threshold and tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively.
Our methodology supports monotone and nearly-monotone risks, but otherwise makes no distributional assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T17:28:06Z) - Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning.
We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values.
We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z) - Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Tackling Stochasticity in
Multi-Step Regression Stock Price Prediction [54.21695754082441]
Multi-step stock price prediction over a long-term horizon is crucial for forecasting its volatility.
Current solutions to multi-step stock price prediction are mostly designed for single-step, classification-based predictions.
We combine a deep hierarchical variational-autoencoder (VAE) and diffusion probabilistic techniques to do seq2seq stock prediction.
Our model is shown to outperform state-of-the-art solutions in terms of its prediction accuracy and variance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-18T16:21:15Z) - Just-In-Time Learning for Operational Risk Assessment in Power Grids [12.939739997360016]
In a grid with a significant share of renewable generation, operators will need additional tools to evaluate the operational risk.
This paper proposes a Just-In-Time Risk Assessment Learning Framework (JITRALF) as an alternative.
JITRALF trains risk surrogates, one for each hour in the day, using Machine Learning (ML) to predict the quantities needed to estimate risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-26T15:11:27Z) - DeepVol: Volatility Forecasting from High-Frequency Data with Dilated Causal Convolutions [53.37679435230207]
We propose DeepVol, a model based on Dilated Causal Convolutions that uses high-frequency data to forecast day-ahead volatility.
Our empirical results suggest that the proposed deep learning-based approach effectively learns global features from high-frequency data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-23T16:13:47Z) - Bayesian Bilinear Neural Network for Predicting the Mid-price Dynamics
in Limit-Order Book Markets [84.90242084523565]
Traditional time-series econometric methods often appear incapable of capturing the true complexity of the multi-level interactions driving the price dynamics.
By adopting a state-of-the-art second-order optimization algorithm, we train a Bayesian bilinear neural network with temporal attention.
By addressing the use of predictive distributions to analyze errors and uncertainties associated with the estimated parameters and model forecasts, we thoroughly compare our Bayesian model with traditional ML alternatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T18:59:54Z) - Multi-Transformer: A New Neural Network-Based Architecture for
Forecasting S&P Volatility [0.0]
This paper proposes more accurate stock volatility models based on machine and deep learning techniques.
This paper introduces a neural network-based architecture, called Multi-Transformer.
The paper also adapts traditional Transformer layers in order to be used in volatility forecasting models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-26T14:47:04Z) - Interpretability in Safety-Critical FinancialTrading Systems [15.060749321774136]
In 2020, some of the world's most sophisticated quant hedge funds suffered losses.
We implement a gradient-based approach for precisely stress-testing how a trading model's forecasts can be manipulated.
We find our approach discovers seemingly in-sample input settings that result in large negative shifts in return distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T17:05:58Z) - Detecting and Mitigating Test-time Failure Risks via Model-agnostic
Uncertainty Learning [30.86992077157326]
This paper introduces Risk Advisor, a novel post-hoc meta-learner for estimating failure risks and predictive uncertainties of any already-trained black-box classification model.
In addition to providing a risk score, the Risk Advisor decomposes the uncertainty estimates into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty components.
Experiments on various families of black-box classification models and on real-world and synthetic datasets show that the Risk Advisor reliably predicts deployment-time failure risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T17:23:31Z) - Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution
Shifts [49.58991359544005]
PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method.
We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.