Rethinking Bradley-Terry Models in Preference-Based Reward Modeling: Foundations, Theory, and Alternatives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04991v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 18:57:03 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Bradley-Terry Models in Preference-Based Reward Modeling: Foundations, Theory, and Alternatives
• Authors: Hao Sun, Yunyi Shen, Jean-Francois Ton,
• Abstract summary: We revisit the foundations of using Bradley-Terry (BT) models in reward modeling. We argue that the BT model is not a necessary choice from the perspective of downstream optimization. We propose a simple and straightforward upper-bound algorithm, compatible with off-the-shelf binary classifiers.
• Score: 14.401557416713315
• License:
• Abstract: The Bradley-Terry (BT) model is a common and successful practice in reward modeling for Large Language Model (LLM) alignment. However, it remains unclear why this model -- originally developed for multi-player stochastic game matching -- can be adopted to convert pairwise response comparisons to reward values and make predictions. Especially given the fact that only a limited number of prompt-response pairs are sparsely compared with others. In this paper, we first revisit the foundations of using BT models in reward modeling, and establish the convergence rate of BT reward models based on deep neural networks using embeddings, providing a theoretical foundation for their use. Despite theoretically sound, we argue that the BT model is not a necessary choice from the perspective of downstream optimization. This is because a reward model only needs to preserve the correct ranking predictions through a monotonic transformation of the true reward. We highlight the critical concept of order consistency in reward modeling and demonstrate that the BT model possesses this property. Consequently, we propose a simple and straightforward upper-bound algorithm, compatible with off-the-shelf binary classifiers, as an alternative order-consistent reward modeling objective. To offer practical insights, we empirically evaluate the performance of these different reward modeling approaches across more than 12,000 experimental setups, using $6$ base LLMs, $2$ datasets, and diverse annotation designs that vary in quantity, quality, and pairing choices in preference annotations.

Related papers

• Margin Matching Preference Optimization: Enhanced Model Alignment with Granular Feedback [64.67540769692074]
  Large language models (LLMs) fine-tuned with alignment techniques, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, have been instrumental in developing some of the most capable AI systems to date. We introduce an approach called Margin Matching Preference Optimization (MMPO), which incorporates relative quality margins into optimization, leading to improved LLM policies and reward models. Experiments with both human and AI feedback data demonstrate that MMPO consistently outperforms baseline methods, often by a substantial margin, on popular benchmarks including MT-bench and RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:56:11Z)
• General Preference Modeling with Preference Representations for Aligning Language Models [51.14207112118503]
  We introduce preference representation learning, an approach that embeds responses into a latent space to capture intricate preference structures efficiently. We also propose preference score-based General Preference Optimization (GPO), which generalizes reward-based reinforcement learning from human feedback. Our method may enhance the alignment of foundation models with nuanced human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:22:55Z)
• Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHF [1.8130068086063336]
  We introduce Quantile Reward Models (QRMs), a novel approach to reward modeling that learns a distribution over rewards instead of a single scalar value. Our method uses quantile regression to estimate a full, potentially multimodal distribution over preferences, providing a more powerful and nuanced representation of preferences. Our experimental results show that QRM outperforms comparable traditional point-estimate models on RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T10:54:04Z)
• Revisiting SMoE Language Models by Evaluating Inefficiencies with Task Specific Expert Pruning [78.72226641279863]
  Sparse Mixture of Expert (SMoE) models have emerged as a scalable alternative to dense models in language modeling. Our research explores task-specific model pruning to inform decisions about designing SMoE architectures. We introduce an adaptive task-aware pruning technique UNCURL to reduce the number of experts per MoE layer in an offline manner post-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T22:35:03Z)
• Bridging Model-Based Optimization and Generative Modeling via Conservative Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models [54.132297393662654]
  We introduce a hybrid method that fine-tunes cutting-edge diffusion models by optimizing reward models through RL. We demonstrate the capability of our approach to outperform the best designs in offline data, leveraging the extrapolation capabilities of reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:57:29Z)
• Soft Preference Optimization: Aligning Language Models to Expert Distributions [40.84391304598521]
  SPO is a method for aligning generative models, such as Large Language Models (LLMs), with human preferences. SPO integrates preference loss with a regularization term across the model's entire output distribution. We showcase SPO's methodology, its theoretical foundation, and its comparative advantages in simplicity, computational efficiency, and alignment precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T19:48:55Z)
• RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling [100.28366840977966]
  We present RewardBench, a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation of reward models. The dataset is a collection of prompt-chosen-rejected trios spanning chat, reasoning, and safety. On the RewardBench leaderboard, we evaluate reward models trained with a variety of methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:49:54Z)
• Modeling Choice via Self-Attention [8.394221523847325]
  We show that our attention-based choice model is a low-optimal generalization of the Halo Multinomial Logit (Halo-MNL) model. We also establish the first realistic-scale benchmark for choice estimation on real data, conducting an evaluation of existing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:13:07Z)
• Model-Augmented Q-learning [112.86795579978802]
  We propose a MFRL framework that is augmented with the components of model-based RL. Specifically, we propose to estimate not only the $Q$-values but also both the transition and the reward with a shared network. We show that the proposed scheme, called Model-augmented $Q$-learning (MQL), obtains a policy-invariant solution which is identical to the solution obtained by learning with true reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T17:56:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.