From References to Insights: Collaborative Knowledge Minigraph Agents for Automating Scholarly Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06159v1
• Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:06:40 GMT
• Title: From References to Insights: Collaborative Knowledge Minigraph Agents for Automating Scholarly Literature Review
• Authors: Zhi Zhang, Yan Liu, Sheng-hua Zhong, Gong Chen, Yu Yang, Jiannong Cao,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel framework, collaborative knowledge minigraph agents (CKMAs) to automate scholarly literature reviews. A novel prompt-based algorithm, the knowledge minigraph construction agent (KMCA), is designed to identify relationships between information pieces from academic literature. By leveraging the capabilities of large language models on constructed knowledge minigraphs, the multiple path summarization agent (MPSA) efficiently organizes information pieces and relationships from different viewpoints to generate literature review paragraphs.
• Score: 22.80918934436901
• License:
• Abstract: Literature reviews play a crucial role in scientific research for understanding the current state of research, identifying gaps, and guiding future studies on specific topics. However, the process of conducting a comprehensive literature review is yet time-consuming. This paper proposes a novel framework, collaborative knowledge minigraph agents (CKMAs), to automate scholarly literature reviews. A novel prompt-based algorithm, the knowledge minigraph construction agent (KMCA), is designed to identify relationships between information pieces from academic literature and automatically constructs knowledge minigraphs. By leveraging the capabilities of large language models on constructed knowledge minigraphs, the multiple path summarization agent (MPSA) efficiently organizes information pieces and relationships from different viewpoints to generate literature review paragraphs. We evaluate CKMAs on three benchmark datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed techniques generate informative, complete, consistent, and insightful summaries for different research problems, promoting the use of LLMs in more professional fields.

Related papers

• Automating Bibliometric Analysis with Sentence Transformers and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): A Pilot Study in Semantic and Contextual Search for Customized Literature Characterization for High-Impact Urban Research [2.1728621449144763]
  Bibliometric analysis is essential for understanding research trends, scope, and impact in urban science. Traditional methods, relying on keyword searches, often fail to uncover valuable insights not explicitly stated in article titles or keywords. We leverage Generative AI models, specifically transformers and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), to automate and enhance bibliometric analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T05:13:27Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• LLAssist: Simple Tools for Automating Literature Review Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  LLAssist is an open-source tool designed to streamline literature reviews in academic research. It uses Large Language Models (LLMs) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to automate key aspects of the review process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T02:48:54Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• QuOTeS: Query-Oriented Technical Summarization [0.2936007114555107]
  We propose QuOTeS, an interactive system designed to retrieve sentences related to a summary of the research from a collection of potential references. QuOTeS integrates techniques from Query-Focused Extractive Summarization and High-Recall Information Retrieval to provide Interactive Query-Focused Summarization of scientific documents. The results show that QuOTeS provides a positive user experience and consistently provides query-focused summaries that are relevant, concise, and complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T18:43:24Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Embedding Knowledge for Document Summarization: A Survey [66.76415502727802]
  Previous works proved that knowledge-embedded document summarizers excel at generating superior digests. We propose novel to recapitulate knowledge and knowledge embeddings under the document summarization view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T04:36:07Z)
• Enhancing Identification of Structure Function of Academic Articles Using Contextual Information [6.28532577139029]
  This paper takes articles of the ACL conference as the corpus to identify the structure function of academic articles. We employ the traditional machine learning models and deep learning models to construct the classifiers based on various feature input. Inspired by (2), this paper introduces contextual information into the deep learning models and achieved significant results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T11:21:21Z)
• What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature [85.95906677964815]
  We introduce a new task of disentangled paper summarization, which seeks to generate separate summaries for the paper contributions and the context of the work. We extend the S2ORC corpus of academic articles by adding disentangled "contribution" and "context" reference labels. We propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation protocol which reports the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T02:23:01Z)
• Generating Knowledge Graphs by Employing Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Techniques within the Scholarly Domain [1.9004296236396943]
  We present a new architecture that takes advantage of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning methods for extracting entities and relationships from research publications. Within this research work, we i) tackle the challenge of knowledge extraction by employing several state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Text Mining tools. We generated a scientific knowledge graph including 109,105 triples, extracted from 26,827 abstracts of papers within the Semantic Web domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T08:31:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.