Establishing Minimum Elements for Effective Vulnerability Management in AI Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11317v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 06:22:20 GMT
• Title: Establishing Minimum Elements for Effective Vulnerability Management in AI Software
• Authors: Mohamad Fazelnia, Sara Moshtari, Mehdi Mirakhorli,
• Abstract summary: This paper discusses the minimum elements for AI vulnerability management and the establishment of an Artificial Intelligence Vulnerability Database (AIVD) It presents standardized formats and protocols for disclosing, analyzing, cataloging, and documenting AI vulnerabilities.
• Score: 4.067778725390327
• License:
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), the identification, documentation, and mitigation of vulnerabilities are paramount to ensuring robust and secure systems. This paper discusses the minimum elements for AI vulnerability management and the establishment of an Artificial Intelligence Vulnerability Database (AIVD). It presents standardized formats and protocols for disclosing, analyzing, cataloging, and documenting AI vulnerabilities. It discusses how such an AI incident database must extend beyond the traditional scope of vulnerabilities by focusing on the unique aspects of AI systems. Additionally, this paper highlights challenges and gaps in AI Vulnerability Management, including the need for new severity scores, weakness enumeration systems, and comprehensive mitigation strategies specifically designed to address the multifaceted nature of AI vulnerabilities.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Artificial Intelligence as the New Hacker: Developing Agents for Offensive Security [0.0]
  This paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into offensive cybersecurity. It develops an autonomous AI agent, ReaperAI, designed to simulate and execute cyberattacks. ReaperAI demonstrates the potential to identify, exploit, and analyze security vulnerabilities autonomously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T18:15:12Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• When to Trust AI: Advances and Challenges for Certification of Neural Networks [26.890905486708117]
  Early adoption of AI technology for real-world applications has not been without problems. This paper provides an overview of techniques that have been developed to ensure safety of AI decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:09Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning and Cybersecurity: Risks, Challenges, and Legal Implications [0.4665186371356556]
  In July 2022, the Center for Security and Emerging Technology at Georgetown University and the Program on Geopolitics, Technology, and Governance at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center convened a workshop of experts to examine the relationship between vulnerabilities in artificial intelligence systems and more traditional types of software vulnerabilities. Topics discussed included the extent to which AI vulnerabilities can be handled under standard cybersecurity processes, the barriers currently preventing the accurate sharing of information about AI vulnerabilities, legal issues associated with adversarial attacks on AI systems, and potential areas where government support could improve AI vulnerability management and mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T22:27:53Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS) Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
  The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security. Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Estimating the Brittleness of AI: Safety Integrity Levels and the Need for Testing Out-Of-Distribution Performance [0.0]
  Test, Evaluation, Verification, and Validation for Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a challenge that threatens to limit the economic and societal rewards that AI researchers have devoted themselves to producing. This paper argues that neither of those criteria are certain of Deep Neural Networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T03:33:40Z)
• Vulnerabilities of Connectionist AI Applications: Evaluation and Defence [0.0]
  This article deals with the IT security of connectionist artificial intelligence (AI) applications, focusing on threats to integrity. A comprehensive list of threats and possible mitigations is presented by reviewing the state-of-the-art literature. The discussion of mitigations is likewise not restricted to the level of the AI system itself but rather advocates viewing AI systems in the context of their supply chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T12:33:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.