AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11910v2
- Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:59:44 GMT
- Title: AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsification
- Authors: Zijun Liu, Kaiming Liu, Yiqi Zhu, Xuanyu Lei, Zonghan Yang, Zhenhe Zhang, Peng Li, Yang Liu,
- Abstract summary: We propose Baby-AIGS as a baby-step demonstration of a full-process AIGS system, which is a multi-agent system with agents in roles representing key research process.
Experiments on three tasks preliminarily show that Baby-AIGS could produce meaningful scientific discoveries, though not on par with experienced human researchers.
- Score: 17.50867181053229
- License:
- Abstract: Rapid development of artificial intelligence has drastically accelerated the development of scientific discovery. Trained with large-scale observation data, deep neural networks extract the underlying patterns in an end-to-end manner and assist human researchers with highly-precised predictions in unseen scenarios. The recent rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) and the empowered autonomous agents enable scientists to gain help through interaction in different stages of their research, including but not limited to literature review, research ideation, idea implementation, and academic writing. However, AI researchers instantiated by foundation model empowered agents with full-process autonomy are still in their infancy. In this paper, we study $\textbf{AI-Generated Science}$ (AIGS), where agents independently and autonomously complete the entire research process and discover scientific laws. By revisiting the definition of scientific research, we argue that $\textit{falsification}$ is the essence of both human research process and the design of an AIGS system. Through the lens of falsification, prior systems attempting towards AI-Generated Science either lack the part in their design, or rely heavily on existing verification engines that narrow the use in specialized domains. In this work, we propose Baby-AIGS as a baby-step demonstration of a full-process AIGS system, which is a multi-agent system with agents in roles representing key research process. By introducing FalsificationAgent, which identify and then verify possible scientific discoveries, we empower the system with explicit falsification. Experiments on three tasks preliminarily show that Baby-AIGS could produce meaningful scientific discoveries, though not on par with experienced human researchers. Finally, we discuss on the limitations of current Baby-AIGS, actionable insights, and related ethical issues in detail.
Related papers
- Two Heads Are Better Than One: A Multi-Agent System Has the Potential to Improve Scientific Idea Generation [48.29699224989952]
VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas.
We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel and impactful scientific ideas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z) - The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery [14.465756130099091]
This paper presents the first comprehensive framework for fully automatic scientific discovery.
We introduce The AI Scientist, which generates novel research ideas, writes code, executes experiments, visualizes results, and describes its findings.
In principle, this process can be repeated to iteratively develop ideas in an open-ended fashion, acting like the human scientific community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T16:58:11Z) - Towards a Science Exocortex [0.5687661359570725]
We review the state of the art in agentic AI systems, and discuss how these methods could be extended to have greater impact on science.
A science exocortex could be designed as a swarm of AI agents, with each agent individually streamlining specific researcher tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T14:32:32Z) - DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery.
It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations.
We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z) - BioDiscoveryAgent: An AI Agent for Designing Genetic Perturbation Experiments [112.25067497985447]
We introduce BioDiscoveryAgent, an agent that designs new experiments, reasons about their outcomes, and efficiently navigates the hypothesis space to reach desired solutions.
BioDiscoveryAgent can uniquely design new experiments without the need to train a machine learning model.
It achieves an average of 21% improvement in predicting relevant genetic perturbations across six datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T19:57:17Z) - "Turing Tests" For An AI Scientist [0.0]
This paper proposes a "Turing test for an AI scientist" to assess whether an AI agent can conduct scientific research independently.
We propose seven benchmark tests that evaluate an AI agent's ability to make groundbreaking discoveries in various scientific domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T05:14:27Z) - Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agents [15.125735219811268]
We envision "AI scientists" as systems capable of skeptical learning and reasoning.
Biomedical AI agents combine human creativity and expertise with AI's ability to analyze large datasets.
AI agents can impact areas ranging from virtual cell simulation, programmable control of phenotypes, and the design of cellular circuits to developing new therapies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T16:08:01Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - Toward a Team of AI-made Scientists for Scientific Discovery from Gene
Expression Data [9.767546641019862]
We introduce a novel framework, a Team of AI-made Scientists (TAIS), designed to streamline the scientific discovery pipeline.
TAIS comprises simulated roles, including a project manager, data engineer, and domain expert, each represented by a Large Language Model (LLM)
These roles collaborate to replicate the tasks typically performed by data scientists, with a specific focus on identifying disease-predictive genes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:30:12Z) - The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop
Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole.
AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access.
Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z) - A Developmental Neuro-Robotics Approach for Boosting the Recognition of
Handwritten Digits [91.3755431537592]
Recent evidence shows that a simulation of the children's embodied strategies can improve the machine intelligence too.
This article explores the application of embodied strategies to convolutional neural network models in the context of developmental neuro-robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-23T14:55:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.