Testing classical properties from quantum data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12730v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 18:52:55 GMT
• Title: Testing classical properties from quantum data
• Authors: Matthias C. Caro, Preksha Naik, Joseph Slote,
• Abstract summary: We show that the speedup lost when restricting classical testers to samples can be recovered by testers that use quantum data. For monotonicity testing, we give a quantum algorithm that uses $tildemathcalO(n2)$ function state copies as compared to the $2Omega(sqrtn)$ samples required classically. We also present $mathcalO(1)$-copy testers for symmetry and triangle-freeness, comparing favorably to classical lower bounds of $Omega(n1/4)$ and $Omega(n
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many properties of Boolean functions can be tested far more efficiently than the function can be learned. However, this advantage often disappears when testers are limited to random samples--a natural setting for data science--rather than queries. In this work we investigate the quantum version of this scenario: quantum algorithms that test properties of a function $f$ solely from quantum data in the form of copies of the function state for $f$. For three well-established properties, we show that the speedup lost when restricting classical testers to samples can be recovered by testers that use quantum data. For monotonicity testing, we give a quantum algorithm that uses $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$ function state copies as compared to the $2^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}$ samples required classically. We also present $\mathcal{O}(1)$-copy testers for symmetry and triangle-freeness, comparing favorably to classical lower bounds of $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ and $\Omega(n)$ samples respectively. These algorithms are time-efficient and necessarily include techniques beyond the Fourier sampling approaches applied to earlier testing problems. These results make the case for a general study of the advantages afforded by quantum data for testing. We contribute to this project by complementing our upper bounds with a lower bound of $\Omega(1/\varepsilon)$ for monotonicity testing from quantum data in the proximity regime $\varepsilon\leq\mathcal{O}(n^{-3/2})$. This implies a strict separation between testing monotonicity from quantum data and from quantum queries--where $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$ queries suffice when $\varepsilon=\Theta(n^{-3/2})$. We also exhibit a testing problem that can be solved from $\mathcal{O}(1)$ classical queries but requires $\Omega(2^{n/2})$ function state copies, complementing a separation of the same magnitude in the opposite direction derived from the Forrelation problem.

Related papers

• Slow Mixing of Quantum Gibbs Samplers [47.373245682678515]
  We present a quantum generalization of these tools through a generic bottleneck lemma. This lemma focuses on quantum measures of distance, analogous to the classical Hamming distance but rooted in uniquely quantum principles. Even with sublinear barriers, we use Feynman-Kac techniques to lift classical to quantum ones establishing tight lower bound $T_mathrmmix = 2Omega(nalpha)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T22:51:27Z)
• Hidden-State Proofs of Quantumness [1.0878040851638]
  An experimental cryptographic proof of quantumness will be a vital milestone in the progress of quantum information science. Error tolerance is a persistent challenge for implementing such tests. We present a proof of quantumness which maintains the same circuit structure as (Brakerski et al.)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T21:04:53Z)
• Quantum property testing in sparse directed graphs [0.9624643581968987]
  In the classical unidirectional model the problem of testing $k$-star-freeness, and more generally $k$-source-subgraph-freeness, is almost maximally hard for large $k$. We show that also quantumly it requires a linear number of queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T13:00:43Z)
• Time-Efficient Quantum Entropy Estimator via Samplizer [7.319050391449301]
  Estimating the entropy of a quantum state is a basic problem in quantum information. We introduce a time-efficient quantum approach to estimating the von Neumann entropy $S(rho)$ and R'enyi entropy $S_alpha(rho)$ of an $N$-dimensional quantum state $rho.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T12:50:20Z)
• Towards large-scale quantum optimization solvers with few qubits [59.63282173947468]
  We introduce a variational quantum solver for optimizations over $m=mathcalO(nk)$ binary variables using only $n$ qubits, with tunable $k>1$. We analytically prove that the specific qubit-efficient encoding brings in a super-polynomial mitigation of barren plateaus as a built-in feature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T18:59:38Z)
• Quantum Lower Bounds by Sample-to-Query Lifting [7.319050391449301]
  We propose an arguably new method for proving quantum query lower bounds by a quantum sample-to-query lifting theorem. We provide unified proof for some known lower bounds, including those for phase/amplitude estimation and Hamiltonian simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T14:41:49Z)
• Succinct quantum testers for closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions [2.3466828785520373]
  We explore potential quantum speedups for the fundamental problem of testing the properties of closeness and $k$-wise uniformity of probability distributions. We show that the quantum query complexities for $ell1$- and $ell2$-closeness testing are $O(sqrtn/varepsilon)$ and $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)$. We propose the first quantum algorithm for this problem with query complexity $O(sqrtnk/varepsilon)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T15:32:37Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Validation tests of GBS quantum computers give evidence for quantum advantage with a decoherent target [62.997667081978825]
  We use positive-P phase-space simulations of grouped count probabilities as a fingerprint for verifying multi-mode data. We show how one can disprove faked data, and apply this to a classical count algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T12:00:45Z)
• Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle Model [57.663890114335736]
  We give a comprehensive characterization of the computational power of shallow quantum circuits combined with classical computation. For some problems, the ability to perform adaptive measurements in a single shallow quantum circuit is more useful than the ability to perform many shallow quantum circuits without adaptive measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T17:54:02Z)
• How to simulate quantum measurement without computing marginals [3.222802562733787]
  We describe and analyze algorithms for classically computation measurement of an $n$-qubit quantum state $psi$ in the standard basis. Our algorithms reduce the sampling task to computing poly(n)$ amplitudes of $n$-qubit states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T21:44:05Z)
• Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learning [6.488575826304023]
  We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. For any input distribution $mathcalD(x)$, a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing $mathcalE$ a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T10:10:09Z)
• Quantum Communication Complexity of Distribution Testing [114.31181206328276]
  Two players each receive $t$ samples from one distribution over $[n]$. The goal is to decide whether their two distributions are equal, or are $epsilon$-far apart. We show that the quantum communication complexity of this problem is $tildeO$(tepsilon2))$ qubits when distributions have low $l$-norm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T09:05:58Z)
• Entanglement is Necessary for Optimal Quantum Property Testing [15.58122727889318]
  We show that with independent measurements, $Omega(d4/3/epsilon2)$ is necessary, even if the measurements are chosen adaptively. We develop several new techniques, including a chain-rule style proof of Paninski's lower bound for classical uniformity testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T18:28:39Z)
• Quantum Gram-Schmidt Processes and Their Application to Efficient State Read-out for Quantum Algorithms [87.04438831673063]
  We present an efficient read-out protocol that yields the classical vector form of the generated state. Our protocol suits the case that the output state lies in the row space of the input matrix. One of our technical tools is an efficient quantum algorithm for performing the Gram-Schmidt orthonormal procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T11:05:26Z)
• Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model [63.18141027763459]
  We give scalable, explicit digital quantum algorithms to simulate the lattice Schwinger model in both NISQ and fault-tolerant settings. In lattice units, we find a Schwinger model on $N/2$ physical sites with coupling constant $x-1/2$ and electric field cutoff $x-1/2Lambda$. We estimate observables which we cost in both the NISQ and fault-tolerant settings by assuming a simple target observable---the mean pair density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T19:18:36Z)
• Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
  We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution. We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost. Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z)
• Quantum Coupon Collector [62.58209964224025]
  We study how efficiently a $k$-element set $Ssubseteq[n]$ can be learned from a uniform superposition $|Srangle of its elements. We give tight bounds on the number of quantum samples needed for every $k$ and $n$, and we give efficient quantum learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T16:14:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.