ICLERB: In-Context Learning Embedding and Reranker Benchmark
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18947v1
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:28:45 GMT
- Title: ICLERB: In-Context Learning Embedding and Reranker Benchmark
- Authors: Marie Al Ghossein, Emile Contal, Alexandre Robicquet,
- Abstract summary: In-Context Learning (ICL) enables Large Language Models to perform new tasks by conditioning on prompts with relevant information.
Traditional retrieval methods focus on semantic relevance, treating retrieval as a search problem.
We propose reframing retrieval for ICL as a recommendation problem, aiming to select documents that maximize utility in ICL tasks.
- Score: 45.40331863265474
- License:
- Abstract: In-Context Learning (ICL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform new tasks by conditioning on prompts with relevant information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances ICL by incorporating retrieved documents into the LLM's context at query time. However, traditional retrieval methods focus on semantic relevance, treating retrieval as a search problem. In this paper, we propose reframing retrieval for ICL as a recommendation problem, aiming to select documents that maximize utility in ICL tasks. We introduce the In-Context Learning Embedding and Reranker Benchmark (ICLERB), a novel evaluation framework that compares retrievers based on their ability to enhance LLM accuracy in ICL settings. Additionally, we propose a novel Reinforcement Learning-to-Rank from AI Feedback (RLRAIF) algorithm, designed to fine-tune retrieval models using minimal feedback from the LLM. Our experimental results reveal notable differences between ICLERB and existing benchmarks, and demonstrate that small models fine-tuned with our RLRAIF algorithm outperform large state-of-the-art retrieval models. These findings highlight the limitations of existing evaluation methods and the need for specialized benchmarks and training strategies adapted to ICL.
Related papers
- Self-Calibrated Listwise Reranking with Large Language Models [137.6557607279876]
Large language models (LLMs) have been employed in reranking tasks through a sequence-to-sequence approach.
This reranking paradigm requires a sliding window strategy to iteratively handle larger candidate sets.
We propose a novel self-calibrated listwise reranking method, which aims to leverage LLMs to produce global relevance scores for ranking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T10:31:31Z) - Real-Time Personalization for LLM-based Recommendation with Customized In-Context Learning [57.28766250993726]
This work explores adapting to dynamic user interests without any model updates.
Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based recommenders often lose the in-context learning ability during recommendation tuning.
We propose RecICL, which customizes recommendation-specific in-context learning for real-time recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T15:48:36Z) - GenCRF: Generative Clustering and Reformulation Framework for Enhanced Intent-Driven Information Retrieval [20.807374287510623]
We propose GenCRF: a Generative Clustering and Reformulation Framework to capture diverse intentions adaptively.
We show that GenCRF achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing previous query reformulation SOTAs by up to 12% on nDCG@10.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T05:59:32Z) - Learning to Retrieve Iteratively for In-Context Learning [56.40100968649039]
iterative retrieval is a novel framework that empowers retrievers to make iterative decisions through policy optimization.
We instantiate an iterative retriever for composing in-context learning exemplars and apply it to various semantic parsing tasks.
By adding only 4M additional parameters for state encoding, we convert an off-the-shelf dense retriever into a stateful iterative retriever.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T21:07:55Z) - Recall, Retrieve and Reason: Towards Better In-Context Relation Extraction [11.535892987373947]
Relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between entities mentioned in texts.
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive in-context learning abilities in various tasks.
LLMs suffer from poor performances compared to most supervised fine-tuned RE methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-27T07:12:52Z) - Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documents [0.046603287532620746]
This paper explores the existing constraints of RAG pipelines and introduces methodologies for enhancing text retrieval.
It delves into strategies such as sophisticated chunking techniques, query expansion, the incorporation of metadata annotations, the application of re-ranking algorithms, and the fine-tuning of embedding algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T00:49:40Z) - ReLLa: Retrieval-enhanced Large Language Models for Lifelong Sequential Behavior Comprehension in Recommendation [43.270424225285105]
We focus on adapting and empowering a pure large language model for zero-shot and few-shot recommendation tasks.
We propose Retrieval-enhanced Large Language models (ReLLa) for recommendation tasks in both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T02:25:04Z) - Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline.
This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z) - Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for
Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections.
InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.