Resolving Schrödinger's analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: an incompleteness criterion and weak elements of reality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00406v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:18:45 GMT
• Title: Resolving Schrödinger's analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: an incompleteness criterion and weak elements of reality
• Authors: C. McGuigan, R. Y. Teh, P. D. Drummond, M. D Reid,
• Abstract summary: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox was presented as an argument that quantum mechanics is an incomplete description of physical reality. Schrodinger pointed out that the correlated states of the paradox enable the simultaneous measurement of $hatx$ and $hatp$. We derive a criterion for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics, showing that the criterion is feasible for current experiments.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox was presented as an argument that quantum mechanics is an incomplete description of physical reality. However, the premises on which the argument is based are falsifiable by Bell experiments. In this paper, we examine the EPR paradox from the perspective of Schrodinger's reply to EPR. Schrodinger pointed out that the correlated states of the paradox enable the simultaneous measurement of $\hat{x}$ and $\hat{p}$, one by direct, the other by indirect measurement. Schrodinger's analysis takes on a timely importance because a recent experiment realizes these correlations for macroscopic atomic systems. Different to the original argument, Schrodinger's analysis applies to the experiment at the time when the measurement settings have been fixed. In this context, a subset of local realistic assumptions (not negated by Bell's theorem) implies that $x$ and $p$ are simultaneously precisely defined. Hence, an alternative EPR argument can be presented that quantum mechanics is incomplete, based on a set of (arguably) nonfalsifiable premises. As systems are amplified, macroscopic realism can be invoked, and the premises are referred to as weak macroscopic realism (wMR). In this paper, we propose a realization of Schrodinger's gedanken experiment where field quadrature phase amplitudes $\hat{X}$ and $\hat{P}$ replace position and momentum. Assuming wMR, we derive a criterion for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics, showing that the criterion is feasible for current experiments. Questions raised by Schrodinger are resolved. By performing simulations based on an objective-field ($Q$-based) model for quantum mechanics, we illustrate the emergence on amplification of simultaneous predetermined values for $\hat{X}$ and $\hat{P}$. The values can be regarded as weak elements of reality, along the lines of Bell's macroscopic beables.

Related papers

• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1'' for $N$ qubits [16.688291626259435]
  EPR paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics. We show that the contradiction holds for any $N$-qubit state as long as both the pure state requirement and the measurement requirement are satisfied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T03:28:26Z)
• Generalized Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Paradox [18.5699135339787]
  We present a generalized EPR steering paradox, which predicts a contradictory equality $2_Q=left( 1+deltaright)_C$. We test the paradox through a two-setting steering protocol, and find that the state is steerable if some specific measurement requirements are satisfied. Our construction also enlightens the building of EPR steering inequality, which may contribute to some schemes for typical quantum teleportation and quantum key distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T01:25:11Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  RQM measurement arise from interactions which entangle a system $$S and an observer $A$ without decoherence. The criterion states that whenever an interpretation introduces a notion of outcomes, these outcomes must follow the probability distribution specified by the Born rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T23:15:00Z)
• Quantum stochastic phase-space theorems lead to hidden causal loops in a model for measurement consistent with macroscopic realism, Bell nonlocality and no-signaling [0.0]
  We show how quantum measurement and nonlocality can be explained consistently with macroscopic realism and no-signaling. We analyze a measurement of $hatx$ on a system prepared in a superposition of eigenstates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T13:10:20Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
  It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z)
• A Steering Paradox for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and its Extended Inequality [0.0]
  We formulate the original EPR steering paradox into a contradiction equality. We perform an experimental test of the steering paradox in a two-qubit scenario. Our results deepen the understanding of quantum foundations and provide an efficient way to detect the steerability of quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-09T03:42:44Z)
• Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox [0.0]
  The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T18:34:20Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.