A Steering Paradox for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and its Extended Inequality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04352v3
• Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:06:52 GMT
• Title: A Steering Paradox for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and its Extended Inequality
• Authors: Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng, Maolin Luo, Xiaogang Qiang, Jing-Ling Chen, and Xiaoqi Zhou
• Abstract summary: We formulate the original EPR steering paradox into a contradiction equality. We perform an experimental test of the steering paradox in a two-qubit scenario. Our results deepen the understanding of quantum foundations and provide an efficient way to detect the steerability of quantum states.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is one of the milestones in quantum foundations, arising from the lack of local realistic description of quantum mechanics. The EPR paradox has stimulated an important concept of "quantum nonlocality", which manifests itself by three different types: quantum entanglement, quantum steering, and Bell nonlocality. Although Bell nonlocality is more often used to show the "quantum nonlocality", the original EPR paradox is essentially a steering paradox. In this work, we formulate the original EPR steering paradox into a contradiction equality,thus making it amenable to an experimental verification. We perform an experimental test of the steering paradox in a two-qubit scenario. Furthermore, by starting from the steering paradox, we generate a generalized linear steering inequality and transform this inequality into a mathematically equivalent form, which is more friendly for experimental implementation, i.e., one may only measure the observables in $x$-, $y$-, or $z$-axis of the Bloch sphere, rather than other arbitrary directions. We also perform experiments to demonstrate this scheme. Within the experimental errors, the experimental results coincide with the theoretical predictions. Our results deepen the understanding of quantum foundations and provide an efficient way to detect the steerability of quantum states.

Related papers

• Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering paradox "2=1'' for $N$ qubits [16.688291626259435]
  EPR paradox highlights the absence of a local realistic explanation for quantum mechanics. We show that the contradiction holds for any $N$-qubit state as long as both the pure state requirement and the measurement requirement are satisfied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T03:28:26Z)
• Generalized Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering Paradox [18.5699135339787]
  We present a generalized EPR steering paradox, which predicts a contradictory equality $2_Q=left( 1+deltaright)_C$. We test the paradox through a two-setting steering protocol, and find that the state is steerable if some specific measurement requirements are satisfied. Our construction also enlightens the building of EPR steering inequality, which may contribute to some schemes for typical quantum teleportation and quantum key distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T01:25:11Z)
• Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
  A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements. Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z)
• Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
  We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers. We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z)
• The Quantum Eraser Paradox [0.0]
  The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment is commonly interpreted as implying that in quantum mechanics a choice made at one time can influence an earlier event. We argue that resolving the paradox requires giving up the idea that, in quantum mechanics, a choice can influence the past, and that it instead requires a violation of Statistical Independence without retrocausality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T19:19:07Z)
• Bell nonlocality in networks [62.997667081978825]
  Bell's theorem proves that quantum theory is inconsistent with local physical models. In the last decade, the investigation of nonlocality has moved beyond Bell's theorem to consider more sophisticated experiments. This review discusses the main concepts, methods, results and future challenges in the emerging topic of Bell nonlocality in networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T18:00:48Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
  An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false. The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)
• Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
  A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it. We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.