PANGAEA: A Global and Inclusive Benchmark for Geospatial Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04204v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 14:40:41 GMT
• Title: PANGAEA: A Global and Inclusive Benchmark for Geospatial Foundation Models
• Authors: Valerio Marsocci, Yuru Jia, Georges Le Bellier, David Kerekes, Liang Zeng, Sebastian Hafner, Sebastian Gerard, Eric Brune, Ritu Yadav, Ali Shibli, Heng Fang, Yifang Ban, Maarten Vergauwen, Nicolas Audebert, Andrea Nascetti,
• Abstract summary: PANGAEA is a standardized evaluation protocol that covers a diverse set of datasets, tasks, resolutions, sensor modalities, and temporalities. We evaluate the most popular GFMs openly available on this benchmark and analyze their performance across several domains. Our findings highlight the limitations of GFMs, under different scenarios, showing that they do not consistently outperform supervised models.
• Score: 3.9031647202359667
• License:
• Abstract: Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) have emerged as powerful tools for extracting representations from Earth observation data, but their evaluation remains inconsistent and narrow. Existing works often evaluate on suboptimal downstream datasets and tasks, that are often too easy or too narrow, limiting the usefulness of the evaluations to assess the real-world applicability of GFMs. Additionally, there is a distinct lack of diversity in current evaluation protocols, which fail to account for the multiplicity of image resolutions, sensor types, and temporalities, which further complicates the assessment of GFM performance. In particular, most existing benchmarks are geographically biased towards North America and Europe, questioning the global applicability of GFMs. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PANGAEA, a standardized evaluation protocol that covers a diverse set of datasets, tasks, resolutions, sensor modalities, and temporalities. It establishes a robust and widely applicable benchmark for GFMs. We evaluate the most popular GFMs openly available on this benchmark and analyze their performance across several domains. In particular, we compare these models to supervised baselines (e.g. UNet and vanilla ViT), and assess their effectiveness when faced with limited labeled data. Our findings highlight the limitations of GFMs, under different scenarios, showing that they do not consistently outperform supervised models. PANGAEA is designed to be highly extensible, allowing for the seamless inclusion of new datasets, models, and tasks in future research. By releasing the evaluation code and benchmark, we aim to enable other researchers to replicate our experiments and build upon our work, fostering a more principled evaluation protocol for large pre-trained geospatial models. The code is available at https://github.com/VMarsocci/pangaea-bench.

Related papers

• How Does the Spatial Distribution of Pre-training Data Affect Geospatial Foundation Models? [10.126199683760344]
  Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) can help address global challenges such as climate change, agriculture, and disaster response. Previous work on GFMs focused on tailoring model architecture and pre-text tasks, and did not investigate the impact of pre-training data selection on model performance. Our research explores how the geographic distribution of pre-training data affects the performance of GFMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T22:57:09Z)
• OmniEval: An Omnidirectional and Automatic RAG Evaluation Benchmark in Financial Domain [62.89809156574998]
  We introduce an omnidirectional and automatic RAG benchmark, OmniEval, in the financial domain. Our benchmark is characterized by its multi-dimensional evaluation framework. Our experiments demonstrate the comprehensiveness of OmniEval, which includes extensive test datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T15:38:42Z)
• GEOBench-VLM: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Geospatial Tasks [84.86699025256705]
  We present GEOBench-VLM, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on geospatial tasks. Our benchmark features over 10,000 manually verified instructions and covers a diverse set of variations in visual conditions, object type, and scale. We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs to assess their accuracy within the geospatial context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T18:59:56Z)
• Local vs. Global Models for Hierarchical Forecasting [0.0]
  This study explores the influence of distinct information utilisation on the accuracy of hierarchical forecasts. We develop Global Forecasting Models (GFMs) to exploit cross-series and cross-hierarchies information. Two specific GFMs based on LightGBM are introduced, demonstrating superior accuracy and lower model complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T08:51:49Z)
• LangGFM: A Large Language Model Alone Can be a Powerful Graph Foundation Model [27.047809869136458]
  Graph foundation models (GFMs) have recently gained significant attention. Current research tends to focus on specific subsets of graph learning tasks. We propose GFMBench-a systematic and comprehensive benchmark comprising 26 datasets. We also introduce LangGFM, a novel GFM that relies entirely on large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T03:27:19Z)
• Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
  We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations. Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations. We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)
• GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
  We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models. We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench. GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z)
• On Certifying and Improving Generalization to Unseen Domains [87.00662852876177]
  Domain Generalization aims to learn models whose performance remains high on unseen domains encountered at test-time. It is challenging to evaluate DG algorithms comprehensively using a few benchmark datasets. We propose a universal certification framework that can efficiently certify the worst-case performance of any DG method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-24T16:29:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.