Are foundation models for computer vision good conformal predictors?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06082v1
• Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 22:05:38 GMT
• Title: Are foundation models for computer vision good conformal predictors?
• Authors: Leo Fillioux, Julio Silva-Rodríguez, Ismail Ben Ayed, Paul-Henry Cournède, Maria Vakalopoulou, Stergios Christodoulidis, Jose Dolz,
• Abstract summary: We study the behavior of vision and vision-language foundation models under Conformal Prediction (CP) Our findings reveal that foundation models are well-suited for conformalization procedures, particularly those integrating Vision Transformers.
• Score: 17.53651859360999
• License:
• Abstract: Recent advances in self-supervision and constrastive learning have brought the performance of foundation models to unprecedented levels in a variety of tasks. Fueled by this progress, these models are becoming the prevailing approach for a wide array of real-world vision problems, including risk-sensitive and high-stakes applications. However, ensuring safe deployment in these scenarios requires a more comprehensive understanding of their uncertainty modeling capabilities, which has been barely explored. In this work, we delve into the behavior of vision and vision-language foundation models under Conformal Prediction (CP), a statistical framework that provides theoretical guarantees of marginal coverage of the true class. Across extensive experiments including popular vision classification benchmarks, well-known foundation vision models, and three CP methods, our findings reveal that foundation models are well-suited for conformalization procedures, particularly those integrating Vision Transformers. Furthermore, we show that calibrating the confidence predictions of these models leads to efficiency degradation of the conformal set on adaptive CP methods. In contrast, few-shot adaptation to downstream tasks generally enhances conformal scores, where we identify Adapters as a better conformable alternative compared to Prompt Learning strategies. Our empirical study identifies APS as particularly promising in the context of vision foundation models, as it does not violate the marginal coverage property across multiple challenging, yet realistic scenarios.

Related papers

• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• Bayesian Exploration of Pre-trained Models for Low-shot Image Classification [14.211305168954594]
  This work proposes a simple and effective probabilistic model ensemble framework based on Gaussian processes. We achieve the integration of prior knowledge by specifying the mean function with CLIP and the kernel function. We demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms competitive ensemble baselines regarding predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T10:25:28Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• ReCoRe: Regularized Contrastive Representation Learning of World Model [21.29132219042405]
  We present a world model that learns invariant features using contrastive unsupervised learning and an intervention-invariant regularizer. Our method outperforms current state-of-the-art model-based and model-free RL methods and significantly improves on out-of-distribution point navigation tasks evaluated on the iGibson benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T15:53:07Z)
• On the Out of Distribution Robustness of Foundation Models in Medical Image Segmentation [47.95611203419802]
  Foundations for vision and language, pre-trained on extensive sets of natural image and text data, have emerged as a promising approach. We compare the generalization performance to unseen domains of various pre-trained models after being fine-tuned on the same in-distribution dataset. We further developed a new Bayesian uncertainty estimation for frozen models and used them as an indicator to characterize the model's performance on out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:52:10Z)
• Group-Conditional Conformal Prediction via Quantile Regression Calibration for Crop and Weed Classification [0.0]
  This article presents the conformal prediction framework that provides valid statistical guarantees on the predictive performance of any black box prediction machine. The framework is exposed with a focus on its practical aspects and special attention accorded to the Adaptive Prediction Sets (APS) approach. To tackle this shortcoming, group-conditional conformal approaches are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T08:02:41Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation of Transformers' Predictions via Topological Analysis of the Attention Matrices [3.1466086042810884]
  Transformer-based language models have set new benchmarks across a wide range of NLP tasks. reliably estimating the uncertainty of their predictions remains a significant challenge. We tackle these limitations by harnessing the geometry of attention maps across multiple heads and layers to assess model confidence. Our method significantly outperforms existing uncertainty estimation techniques on benchmarks for acceptability judgments and artificial text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T09:17:45Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• On the model-based stochastic value gradient for continuous reinforcement learning [50.085645237597056]
  We show that simple model-based agents can outperform state-of-the-art model-free agents in terms of both sample-efficiency and final reward. Our findings suggest that model-based policy evaluation deserves closer attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T17:58:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.