Key Safety Design Overview in AI-driven Autonomous Vehicles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08862v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:48:45 GMT
• Title: Key Safety Design Overview in AI-driven Autonomous Vehicles
• Authors: Vikas Vyas, Zheyuan Xu,
• Abstract summary: It is essential to maintain a high level of functional safety and robust software design. This paper explores the necessary safety architecture and systematic approach for automotive software and hardware.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: With the increasing presence of autonomous SAE level 3 and level 4, which incorporate artificial intelligence software, along with the complex technical challenges they present, it is essential to maintain a high level of functional safety and robust software design. This paper explores the necessary safety architecture and systematic approach for automotive software and hardware, including fail soft handling of automotive safety integrity level (ASIL) D (highest level of safety integrity), integration of artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) in automotive safety architecture. By addressing the unique challenges presented by increasing AI-based automotive software, we proposed various techniques, such as mitigation strategies and safety failure analysis, to ensure the safety and reliability of automotive software, as well as the role of AI in software reliability throughout the data lifecycle. Index Terms Safety Design, Automotive Software, Performance Evaluation, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) Applications, Automotive Software Systems, Electronic Control Units.

Related papers

• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Landscape of AI safety concerns -- A methodology to support safety assurance for AI-based autonomous systems [0.0]
  AI has emerged as a key technology, driving advancements across a range of applications. The challenge of assuring safety in systems that incorporate AI components is substantial. We propose a novel methodology designed to support the creation of safety assurance cases for AI-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:38:16Z)
• Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress? [59.96471873997733]
  We propose an empirical foundation for developing more meaningful safety metrics and define AI safety in a machine learning research context. We aim to provide a more rigorous framework for AI safety research, advancing the science of safety evaluations and clarifying the path towards measurable progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T17:59:24Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• On STPA for Distributed Development of Safe Autonomous Driving: An Interview Study [0.7851536646859475]
  System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a novel method applied in safety-related fields like defense and aerospace. STPA assumes prerequisites that are not fully valid in the automotive system engineering with distributed system development and multi-abstraction design levels. This can be seen as a maintainability challenge in continuous development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:56:02Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Inherent Diverse Redundant Safety Mechanisms for AI-based Software Elements in Automotive Applications [1.6495054381576084]
  This paper explores the role and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms in autonomous driving systems. A primary concern relates to the ability (and necessity) of AI models to generalize beyond their initial training data. This paper investigates the risk associated with overconfident AI models in safety-critical applications like autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T04:15:26Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Synergistic Redundancy: Towards Verifiable Safety for Autonomous Vehicles [10.277825331268179]
  We propose Synergistic Redundancy (SR) a safety architecture for complex cyber physical systems, like Autonomous Vehicle (AV) SR provides verifiable safety guarantees against specific faults by decoupling the mission and safety tasks of the system. Close coordination with the mission layer allows easier and early detection of safety critical faults in the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T23:52:03Z)
• Towards Safe, Explainable, and Regulated Autonomous Driving [11.043966021881426]
  We propose a framework that integrates autonomous control, explainable AI (XAI), and regulatory compliance. We describe relevant XAI approaches that can help achieve the goals of the framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-20T05:06:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.