Hesitation and Tolerance in Recommender Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.09950v1
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:14:10 GMT
- Title: Hesitation and Tolerance in Recommender Systems
- Authors: Kuan Zou, Aixin Sun, Xuemeng Jiang, Yitong Ji, Hao Zhang, Jing Wang, Ruijie Guo,
- Abstract summary: We find that hesitation is widespread and has a profound impact on user experiences.<n>When users spend additional time engaging with content they are ultimately uninterested in, this can lead to negative emotions, a phenomenon we term as tolerance.<n>We identify signals indicative of tolerance behavior and analyzed datasets from both e-commerce and short-video platforms.
- Score: 33.755867719862394
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: User interactions in recommender systems are inherently complex, often involving behaviors that go beyond simple acceptance or rejection. One particularly common behavior is hesitation, where users deliberate over recommended items, signaling uncertainty. Our large-scale surveys, with 6,644 and 3,864 responses respectively, confirm that hesitation is not only widespread but also has a profound impact on user experiences. When users spend additional time engaging with content they are ultimately uninterested in, this can lead to negative emotions, a phenomenon we term as tolerance. The surveys reveal that such tolerance behaviors often arise after hesitation and can erode trust, satisfaction, and long-term loyalty to the platform. For instance, a click might reflect a need for more information rather than genuine interest, and prolonged exposure to unsuitable content amplifies frustration. This misalignment between user intent and system interpretation introduces noise into recommendation training, resulting in suggestions that increase uncertainty and disengagement. To address these issues, we identified signals indicative of tolerance behavior and analyzed datasets from both e-commerce and short-video platforms. The analysis shows a strong correlation between increased tolerance behavior and decreased user activity. We integrated these insights into the training process of a recommender system for a major short-video platform. Results from four independent online A/B experiments demonstrated significant improvements in user retention, achieved with minimal additional computational costs. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing hesitation as a ubiquitous user behavior and addressing tolerance to enhance satisfaction, build trust, and sustain long-term engagement in recommender systems.
Related papers
- Mind the Gap! Static and Interactive Evaluations of Large Audio Models [55.87220295533817]
Large Audio Models (LAMs) are designed to power voice-native experiences.
This study introduces an interactive approach to evaluate LAMs and collect 7,500 LAM interactions from 484 participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-21T20:29:02Z) - Designing and Evaluating an Educational Recommender System with Different Levels of User Control [0.6291443816903801]
We present the systematic design and evaluation of an interactive educational recommender system (ERS)
We introduce user control around the input (i.e., user profile), process (i.e., recommendation algorithm), and output (i.e., recommendations) of the ERS.
Our results demonstrate the positive impact of user control on user perceived benefits of the ERS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T14:14:49Z) - Retrieval Augmentation via User Interest Clustering [57.63883506013693]
Industrial recommender systems are sensitive to the patterns of user-item engagement.
We propose a novel approach that efficiently constructs user interest and facilitates low computational cost inference.
Our approach has been deployed in multiple products at Meta, facilitating short-form video related recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T16:35:10Z) - Modeling User Retention through Generative Flow Networks [34.74982897470852]
Flow-based modeling technique can back-propagate the retention reward towards each recommended item in the user session.
We show that the flow combined with traditional learning-to-rank objectives eventually optimized a non-discounted cumulative reward for both immediate user feedback and user retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T06:22:18Z) - System-2 Recommenders: Disentangling Utility and Engagement in Recommendation Systems via Temporal Point-Processes [80.97898201876592]
We propose a generative model in which past content interactions impact the arrival rates of users based on a self-exciting Hawkes process.
We show analytically that given samples it is possible to disentangle System-1 and System-2 and allow content optimization based on user utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T18:19:37Z) - Contrastive Learning Method for Sequential Recommendation based on Multi-Intention Disentanglement [5.734747179463411]
We propose a Contrastive Learning sequential recommendation method based on Multi-Intention Disentanglement (MIDCL)
In our work, intentions are recognized as dynamic and diverse, and user behaviors are often driven by current multi-intentions.
We propose two types of contrastive learning paradigms for finding the most relevant user's interactive intention, and maximizing the mutual information of positive sample pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-28T15:13:36Z) - Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback.
The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied.
We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z) - Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable.
Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs.
We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z) - Feedback Effect in User Interaction with Intelligent Assistants: Delayed
Engagement, Adaption and Drop-out [9.205174767678365]
This paper identifies and quantifies the feedback effect, a novel component in IA-user interactions.
We show that unhelpful responses from the IA cause users to delay or reduce subsequent interactions.
As users discover the limitations of the IA's understanding and functional capabilities, they learn to adjust the scope and wording of their requests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T21:39:33Z) - A Transformer-Based User Satisfaction Prediction for Proactive
Interaction Mechanism in DuerOS [12.060990859604681]
We propose a proactive interaction mechanism where the system predicts the user satisfaction with the candidate response before giving it to the user.
If the user is not likely to be satisfied according to the prediction, the system will ask the user a suitable question to determine the real intent of the user.
We deploy and evaluate our model on DuerOS, and observe a 19% relative improvement on the accuracy of user satisfaction prediction and 2.3% relative improvement on user experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T09:17:49Z) - Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User
Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training.
A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data.
We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.