Designing and Evaluating an Educational Recommender System with Different Levels of User Control
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12894v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:14:49 GMT
- Title: Designing and Evaluating an Educational Recommender System with Different Levels of User Control
- Authors: Qurat Ul Ain, Mohamed Amine Chatti, William Kana Tsoplefack, Rawaa Alatrash, Shoeb Joarder,
- Abstract summary: We present the systematic design and evaluation of an interactive educational recommender system (ERS)<n>We introduce user control around the input (i.e., user profile), process (i.e., recommendation algorithm), and output (i.e., recommendations) of the ERS.<n>Our results demonstrate the positive impact of user control on user perceived benefits of the ERS.
- Score: 0.6291443816903801
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Educational recommender systems (ERSs) play a crucial role in personalizing learning experiences and enhancing educational outcomes by providing recommendations of personalized resources and activities to learners, tailored to their individual learning needs. However, their effectiveness is often diminished by insufficient user control and limited transparency. To address these challenges, in this paper, we present the systematic design and evaluation of an interactive ERS, in which we introduce different levels of user control. Concretely, we introduce user control around the input (i.e., user profile), process (i.e., recommendation algorithm), and output (i.e., recommendations) of the ERS. To evaluate our system, we conducted an online user study (N=30) to explore the impact of user control on users' perceptions of the ERS in terms of several important user-centric aspects. Moreover, we investigated the effects of user control on multiple recommendation goals, namely transparency, trust, and satisfaction, as well as the interactions between these goals. Our results demonstrate the positive impact of user control on user perceived benefits of the ERS. Moreover, our study shows that user control strongly correlates with transparency and moderately correlates with trust and satisfaction. In terms of interaction between these goals, our results reveal that transparency moderately correlates and trust strongly correlates with satisfaction. Whereas, transparency and trust stand out as less correlated with each other.
Related papers
- Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on Conversational Recommender Systems: A Simulation with Large Language Models [70.180385882195]
This paper introduces a personality-aware user simulation for Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs)
The user agent induces customizable personality traits and preferences, while the system agent possesses the persuasion capability to simulate realistic interaction in CRSs.
Experimental results demonstrate that state-of-the-art LLMs can effectively generate diverse user responses aligned with specified personality traits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T13:21:17Z) - Quantifying User Coherence: A Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Recommendation Analysis [69.37718774071793]
This paper introduces novel information-theoretic measures for understanding recommender systems.
We evaluate 7 recommendation algorithms across 9 datasets, revealing the relationships between our measures and standard performance metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T13:02:07Z) - Contrastive Learning Method for Sequential Recommendation based on Multi-Intention Disentanglement [5.734747179463411]
We propose a Contrastive Learning sequential recommendation method based on Multi-Intention Disentanglement (MIDCL)
In our work, intentions are recognized as dynamic and diverse, and user behaviors are often driven by current multi-intentions.
We propose two types of contrastive learning paradigms for finding the most relevant user's interactive intention, and maximizing the mutual information of positive sample pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-28T15:13:36Z) - Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback.
The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied.
We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z) - User-Controllable Recommendation via Counterfactual Retrospective and
Prospective Explanations [96.45414741693119]
We present a user-controllable recommender system that seamlessly integrates explainability and controllability.
By providing both retrospective and prospective explanations through counterfactual reasoning, users can customize their control over the system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-02T01:13:36Z) - Interactive Explanation with Varying Level of Details in an Explainable
Scientific Literature Recommender System [0.5937476291232802]
We aim in this paper to adopt a user-centered, interactive explanation model that provides explanations with different levels of detail and empowers users to interact with, control, and personalize the explanations based on their needs and preferences.
We conducted a qualitative user study to investigate the impact of providing interactive explanations with varying level of details on the users' perception of the explainable RS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T10:48:04Z) - Editable User Profiles for Controllable Text Recommendation [66.00743968792275]
We propose LACE, a novel concept value bottleneck model for controllable text recommendations.
LACE represents each user with a succinct set of human-readable concepts.
It learns personalized representations of the concepts based on user documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-09T14:52:18Z) - Influential Recommender System [12.765277278599541]
We present Influential Recommender System (IRS), a new recommendation paradigm that aims to proactively lead a user to like a given objective item.
IRS progressively recommends to the user a sequence of carefully selected items (called an influence path)
We show that IRN significantly outperforms the baseline recommenders and demonstrates its capability of influencing users' interests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T03:04:45Z) - Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User
Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training.
A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data.
We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z) - Soliciting Human-in-the-Loop User Feedback for Interactive Machine
Learning Reduces User Trust and Impressions of Model Accuracy [8.11839312231511]
Mixed-initiative systems allow users to interactively provide feedback to improve system performance.
Our research investigates how the act of providing feedback can affect user understanding of an intelligent system and its accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-28T16:46:41Z) - Enabling the Analysis of Personality Aspects in Recommender Systems [0.0]
Existing recommender systems mainly focus on exploiting users' feedback, e.g., ratings, and reviews on common items to detect similar users.
We call this problem the Data Sparsity With no Feedback on Common Items (DSW-n-FCI)
We identify users' personality type implicitly with no burden on users and incorporate it along with users' personal interests and their level of knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-07T23:02:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.