Adaptive Nonparametric Perturbations of Parametric Bayesian Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10683v2
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:24:35 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Nonparametric Perturbations of Parametric Bayesian Models
• Authors: Bohan Wu, Eli N. Weinstein, Sohrab Salehi, Yixin Wang, David M. Blei,
• Abstract summary: We study nonparametrically perturbed parametric (NPP) Bayesian models, in which a parametric Bayesian model is relaxed via a distortion of its likelihood. We show that NPP models can offer the robustness of non models while retaining the data efficiency of parametric models. We demonstrate our method by estimating causal effects of gene expression from single cell RNA sequencing data.
• Score: 33.85958872117418
• License:
• Abstract: Parametric Bayesian modeling offers a powerful and flexible toolbox for scientific data analysis. Yet the model, however detailed, may still be wrong, and this can make inferences untrustworthy. In this paper we study nonparametrically perturbed parametric (NPP) Bayesian models, in which a parametric Bayesian model is relaxed via a distortion of its likelihood. We analyze the properties of NPP models when the target of inference is the true data distribution or some functional of it, such as in causal inference. We show that NPP models can offer the robustness of nonparametric models while retaining the data efficiency of parametric models, achieving fast convergence when the parametric model is close to true. To efficiently analyze data with an NPP model, we develop a generalized Bayes procedure to approximate its posterior. We demonstrate our method by estimating causal effects of gene expression from single cell RNA sequencing data. NPP modeling offers an efficient approach to robust Bayesian inference and can be used to robustify any parametric Bayesian model.

Related papers

• Bayesian Model Parameter Learning in Linear Inverse Problems with Application in EEG Focal Source Imaging [49.1574468325115]
  Inverse problems can be described as limited-data problems in which the signal of interest cannot be observed directly. We studied a linear inverse problem that included an unknown non-linear model parameter. We utilized a Bayesian model-based learning approach that allowed signal recovery and subsequently estimation of the model parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T18:14:24Z)
• SMILE: Zero-Shot Sparse Mixture of Low-Rank Experts Construction From Pre-Trained Foundation Models [85.67096251281191]
  We present an innovative approach to model fusion called zero-shot Sparse MIxture of Low-rank Experts (SMILE) construction. SMILE allows for the upscaling of source models into an MoE model without extra data or further training. We conduct extensive experiments across diverse scenarios, such as image classification and text generation tasks, using full fine-tuning and LoRA fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:32:15Z)
• A variational neural Bayes framework for inference on intractable posterior distributions [1.0801976288811024]
  Posterior distributions of model parameters are efficiently obtained by feeding observed data into a trained neural network. We show theoretically that our posteriors converge to the true posteriors in Kullback-Leibler divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T20:40:15Z)
• Adaptive debiased machine learning using data-driven model selection techniques [0.5735035463793007]
  Adaptive Debiased Machine Learning (ADML) is a nonbiased framework that combines data-driven model selection and debiased machine learning techniques. ADML avoids the bias introduced by model misspecification and remains free from the restrictions of parametric and semi models. We provide a broad class of ADML estimators for estimating the average treatment effect in adaptive partially linear regression models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T06:16:17Z)
• Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
  characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI. We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells. We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metrics [61.49826776409194]
  We analyze a corpus of models made publicly-available for a contest to predict the generalization accuracy of neural network (NN) models. We identify what amounts to a Simpson's paradox: where "scale" metrics perform well overall but perform poorly on sub partitions of the data. We present two novel shape metrics, one data-independent, and the other data-dependent, which can predict trends in the test accuracy of a series of NNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T19:19:49Z)
• Generative Learning of Heterogeneous Tail Dependence [13.60514494665717]
  Our model features heterogeneous and asymmetric tail dependence between all pairs of individual dimensions. We devise a novel moment learning algorithm to learn the parameters. Results show that this framework gives better finite-sample performance compared to the copula-based benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T05:34:31Z)
• Robust Bayesian Inference for Discrete Outcomes with the Total Variation Distance [5.139874302398955]
  Models of discrete-valued outcomes are easily misspecified if the data exhibit zero-inflation, overdispersion or contamination. Here, we introduce a robust discrepancy-based Bayesian approach using the Total Variation Distance (TVD) We empirically demonstrate that our approach is robust and significantly improves predictive performance on a range of simulated and real world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T09:53:06Z)
• Probabilistic Circuits for Variational Inference in Discrete Graphical Models [101.28528515775842]
  Inference in discrete graphical models with variational methods is difficult. Many sampling-based methods have been proposed for estimating Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) We propose a new approach that leverages the tractability of probabilistic circuit models, such as Sum Product Networks (SPN) We show that selective-SPNs are suitable as an expressive variational distribution, and prove that when the log-density of the target model is aweighted the corresponding ELBO can be computed analytically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T05:04:38Z)
• Amortized Bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning [0.12314765641075436]
  We propose a novel method for performing Bayesian model comparison using specialized deep learning architectures. Our method is purely simulation-based and circumvents the step of explicitly fitting all alternative models under consideration to each observed dataset. We show that our method achieves excellent results in terms of accuracy, calibration, and efficiency across the examples considered in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T15:15:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.