Embodied CoT Distillation From LLM To Off-the-shelf Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11499v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 07:18:02 GMT
- Title: Embodied CoT Distillation From LLM To Off-the-shelf Agents
- Authors: Wonje Choi, Woo Kyung Kim, Minjong Yoo, Honguk Woo,
- Abstract summary: DeDer is a framework for decomposing and distilling the embodied reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments with the ALFRED benchmark demonstrate that DeDer surpasses leading language planning and distillation approaches.
- Score: 6.318203525449058
- License:
- Abstract: We address the challenge of utilizing large language models (LLMs) for complex embodied tasks, in the environment where decision-making systems operate timely on capacity-limited, off-the-shelf devices. We present DeDer, a framework for decomposing and distilling the embodied reasoning capabilities from LLMs to efficient, small language model (sLM)-based policies. In DeDer, the decision-making process of LLM-based strategies is restructured into a hierarchy with a reasoning-policy and planning-policy. The reasoning-policy is distilled from the data that is generated through the embodied in-context learning and self-verification of an LLM, so it can produce effective rationales. The planning-policy, guided by the rationales, can render optimized plans efficiently. In turn, DeDer allows for adopting sLMs for both policies, deployed on off-the-shelf devices. Furthermore, to enhance the quality of intermediate rationales, specific to embodied tasks, we devise the embodied knowledge graph, and to generate multiple rationales timely through a single inference, we also use the contrastively prompted attention model. Our experiments with the ALFRED benchmark demonstrate that DeDer surpasses leading language planning and distillation approaches, indicating the applicability and efficiency of sLM-based embodied policies derived through DeDer.
Related papers
- Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.
Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.
We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z) - Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making.
Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z) - Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks.
LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning.
We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z) - Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios.
We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z) - Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs)
MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task.
We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z) - From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems [59.40480894948944]
Large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world.
Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting.
We prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T09:42:54Z) - Sub-goal Distillation: A Method to Improve Small Language Agents [21.815417165548187]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant promise as agents in interactive tasks.
We propose a method for transferring the performance of an LLM with billions of parameters to a much smaller language model.
In ScienceWorld, a challenging and multi-task interactive text environment, our method surpasses standard imitation learning based solely on elementary actions by 16.7%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-04T20:34:06Z) - LgTS: Dynamic Task Sampling using LLM-generated sub-goals for
Reinforcement Learning Agents [10.936460061405157]
We propose LgTS (LLM-guided Teacher-Student learning), a novel approach that explores the planning abilities of LLMs.
Our approach does not assume access to a propreitary or a fine-tuned LLM, nor does it require pre-trained policies that achieve the sub-goals proposed by the LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T00:07:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.