Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11698v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:14:11 GMT
• Title: Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models
• Authors: Peizhong Gao, Ao Xie, Shaoguang Mao, Wenshan Wu, Yan Xia, Haipeng Mi, Furu Wei,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
• Score: 58.87183757029041
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) inspired by human meta-reasoning. Traditional in-context learning-based reasoning techniques, such as Tree-of-Thoughts, show promise but lack consistent state-of-the-art performance across diverse tasks due to their specialized nature. MRP addresses this limitation by guiding LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task, optimizing both performance and computational efficiency. With MRP, LLM reasoning operates in two phases. Initially, the LLM identifies the most appropriate reasoning method using task input cues and objective descriptions of available methods. Subsequently, it applies the chosen method to complete the task. This dynamic strategy mirrors human meta-reasoning, allowing the model to excel in a wide range of problem domains. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks. The results demonstrate that MRP achieves or approaches state-of-the-art performance across diverse tasks. MRP represents a significant advancement in enabling LLMs to identify cognitive challenges across problems and leverage benefits across different reasoning approaches, enhancing their ability to handle diverse and complex problem domains efficiently. Every LLM deserves a Meta-Reasoning Prompting to unlock its full potential and ensure adaptability in an ever-evolving landscape of challenges and applications.

Related papers

• Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
  We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making. Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate. We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z)
• EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For Exploration [76.66831821738927]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty. We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications. Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z)
• DOTS: Learning to Reason Dynamically in LLMs via Optimal Reasoning Trajectories Search [37.16633337724158]
  DOTS is an approach enabling LLMs to reason dynamically via optimal reasoning trajectory search. Our method consistently outperforms static reasoning techniques and the vanilla instruction tuning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:58:09Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• MAPO: Boosting Large Language Model Performance with Model-Adaptive Prompt Optimization [73.7779735046424]
  We show that different prompts should be adapted to different Large Language Models (LLM) to enhance their capabilities across various downstream tasks in NLP. We then propose a model-adaptive prompt (MAPO) method that optimize the original prompts for each specific LLM in downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:39:59Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Solution-oriented Agent-based Models Generation with Verifier-assisted Iterative In-context Learning [10.67134969207797]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) stand as an essential paradigm for proposing and validating hypothetical solutions or policies. Large language models (LLMs) encapsulating cross-domain knowledge and programming proficiency could potentially alleviate the difficulty of this process. We present SAGE, a general solution-oriented ABM generation framework designed for automatic modeling and generating solutions for targeted problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T07:59:06Z)
• LgTS: Dynamic Task Sampling using LLM-generated sub-goals for Reinforcement Learning Agents [10.936460061405157]
  We propose LgTS (LLM-guided Teacher-Student learning), a novel approach that explores the planning abilities of LLMs. Our approach does not assume access to a propreitary or a fine-tuned LLM, nor does it require pre-trained policies that achieve the sub-goals proposed by the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T00:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.