Development and Adoption of SATD Detection Tools: A State-of-practice Report
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14217v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:06:53 GMT
- Title: Development and Adoption of SATD Detection Tools: A State-of-practice Report
- Authors: Edi Sutoyo, Andrea Capiluppi,
- Abstract summary: Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) refers to instances where developers knowingly introduce suboptimal solutions into code.
This paper provides a comprehensive state-of-practice report on the development and adoption of SATD detection tools.
- Score: 5.670597842524448
- License:
- Abstract: Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) refers to instances where developers knowingly introduce suboptimal solutions into code and document them, often through textual artifacts. This paper provides a comprehensive state-of-practice report on the development and adoption of SATD detection tools. Through a systematic review of the available literature and tools, we examined their overall accessibility. Our findings reveal that, although SATD detection tools are crucial for maintaining software quality, many face challenges such as technological obsolescence, poor maintenance, and limited platform compatibility. Only a small number of tools are actively maintained, hindering their widespread adoption. This report discusses common anti-patterns in tool development, proposes corrections, and highlights the need for implementing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles and fostering greater collaboration between academia and industry to ensure the sustainability and efficacy of these tools. The insights presented here aim to drive more robust management of technical debt and enhance the reliability of SATD tools.
Related papers
- Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.
MeCo captures high-level cognitive signals in the representation space, guiding when to invoke tools.
Our experiments show that MeCo accurately detects LLMs' internal cognitive signals and significantly improves tool-use decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z) - SMART: Self-Aware Agent for Tool Overuse Mitigation [58.748554080273585]
Current Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong reasoning and tool use capabilities, but often lack self-awareness.
This imbalance leads to Tool Overuse, where models unnecessarily rely on external tools for tasks with parametric knowledge.
We introduce SMART (Strategic Model-Aware Reasoning with Tools), a paradigm that enhances an agent's self-awareness to optimize task handling and reduce tool overuse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T04:50:37Z) - ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models [49.04652315815501]
Tool learning has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs) to solve complex real-world tasks through interaction with external tools.
We propose ToolCoder, a novel framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T03:42:28Z) - The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition.
Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies.
We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z) - From Literature to Practice: Exploring Fairness Testing Tools for the Software Industry Adoption [5.901307724130718]
In today's world, we need to ensure that AI systems are fair and unbiased.
Current fairness testing tools need significant improvements to better support software developers.
New tools should be user-friendly, well-documented, and flexible enough to handle different kinds of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T04:23:08Z) - Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs)
The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation.
We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z) - Code Compass: A Study on the Challenges of Navigating Unfamiliar Codebases [2.808331566391181]
We propose a novel tool, Code, to address these issues.
Our study highlights a significant gap in current tools and methodologies.
Our formative study demonstrates how effectively the tool reduces the time developers spend navigating documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T06:58:31Z) - Decoding the Digital Fine Print: Navigating the potholes in Terms of service/ use of GenAI tools against the emerging need for Transparent and Trustworthy Tech Futures [0.0]
The research investigates the crucial role of clear and intelligible terms of service in cultivating user trust and facilitating informed decision-making in the context of AI, in specific GenAI.
It highlights the obstacles presented by complex legal terminology and detailed fine print, which impede genuine user consent and recourse.
Findings indicate inconsistencies and variability in document quality, signaling a pressing demand for uniformity in disclosure practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T04:54:53Z) - Planning, Creation, Usage: Benchmarking LLMs for Comprehensive Tool Utilization in Real-World Complex Scenarios [93.68764280953624]
UltraTool is a novel benchmark designed to improve and evaluate Large Language Models' ability in tool utilization.
It emphasizes real-world complexities, demanding accurate, multi-step planning for effective problem-solving.
A key feature of UltraTool is its independent evaluation of planning with natural language, which happens before tool usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T16:52:56Z) - Self-Admitted Technical Debt Detection Approaches: A Decade Systematic Review [5.670597842524448]
Technical debt (TD) represents the long-term costs associated with suboptimal design or code decisions in software development.
Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD) occurs when developers explicitly acknowledge these trade-offs.
automated detection of SATD has become an increasingly important research area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T12:01:13Z) - DebtViz: A Tool for Identifying, Measuring, Visualizing, and Monitoring
Self-Admitted Technical Debt [1.6201475185215248]
Technical debt, specifically Self-Admitted Technical Debt (SATD), remains a significant challenge for software developers and managers.
This paper presents DebtViz, an innovative SATD tool designed to automatically detect, classify, visualize and monitor various types of SATD in source code comments and issue tracking systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T01:05:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.