Classical Combinatorial Optimization Scaling for Random Ising Models on 2D Heavy-Hex Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15572v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 05:09:30 GMT
• Title: Classical Combinatorial Optimization Scaling for Random Ising Models on 2D Heavy-Hex Graphs
• Authors: Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, Stephan Eidenbenz,
• Abstract summary: Ising models on heavy-hex graphs are examined for their classical computational hardness via empirical time scaling. Because of the sparsity of these Ising models, the classical algorithms are able to find optimal solutions efficiently even for large instances.
• Score: 0.8192907805418583
• License:
• Abstract: Motivated by near term quantum computing hardware limitations, combinatorial optimization problems that can be addressed by current quantum algorithms and noisy hardware with little or no overhead are used to probe capabilities of quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). In this study, a specific class of near term quantum computing hardware defined combinatorial optimization problems, Ising models on heavy-hex graphs both with and without geometrically local cubic terms, are examined for their classical computational hardness via empirical computation time scaling quantification. Specifically the Time-to-Solution metric using the classical heuristic simulated annealing is measured for finding optimal variable assignments (ground states), as well as the time required for the optimization software Gurobi to find an optimal variable assignment. Because of the sparsity of these Ising models, the classical algorithms are able to find optimal solutions efficiently even for large instances (i.e. $100,000$ variables). The Ising models both with and without geometrically local cubic terms exhibit average-case linear-time or weakly quadratic scaling when solved exactly using Gurobi, and the Ising models with no cubic terms show evidence of exponential-time Time-to-Solution scaling when sampled using simulated annealing. These findings point to the necessity of developing and testing more complex, namely more densely connected, optimization problems in order for quantum computing to ever have a practical advantage over classical computing. Our results are another illustration that different classical algorithms can indeed have exponentially different running times, thus making the identification of the best practical classical technique important in any quantum computing vs. classical computing comparison.

Related papers

• Quantum Algorithms for Stochastic Differential Equations: A Schrödingerisation Approach [29.662683446339194]
  We propose quantum algorithms for linear differential equations. The gate complexity of our algorithms exhibits an $mathcalO(dlog(Nd))$ dependence on the dimensions. The algorithms are numerically verified for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes, Brownian motions, and one-dimensional L'evy flights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T14:04:11Z)
• Sum-of-Squares inspired Quantum Metaheuristic for Polynomial Optimization with the Hadamard Test and Approximate Amplitude Constraints [76.53316706600717]
  Recently proposed quantum algorithm arXiv:2206.14999 is based on semidefinite programming (SDP) We generalize the SDP-inspired quantum algorithm to sum-of-squares. Our results show that our algorithm is suitable for large problems and approximate the best known classicals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T19:04:13Z)
• A quantum advantage over classical for local max cut [48.02822142773719]
  Quantum optimization approximation algorithm (QAOA) has a computational advantage over comparable local classical techniques on degree-3 graphs. Results hint that even small-scale quantum computation, which is relevant to the current state-of the art quantum hardware, could have significant advantages over comparably simple classical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T16:42:05Z)
• Enhancing Quantum Algorithms for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization via Integer Programming [0.0]
  In this work, we integrate the potentials of quantum and classical techniques for optimization. We reduce the problem size according to a linear relaxation such that the reduced problem can be handled by quantum machines of limited size. We present numerous computational results from real quantum hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T20:12:53Z)
• Quantum Clustering with k-Means: a Hybrid Approach [117.4705494502186]
  We design, implement, and evaluate three hybrid quantum k-Means algorithms. We exploit quantum phenomena to speed up the computation of distances. We show that our hybrid quantum k-Means algorithms can be more efficient than the classical version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T16:04:16Z)
• Adapting Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for Unit Commitment [2.8060379263058794]
  We formulate and apply a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to a power system optimization problem called Unit Commitment. Our algorithm extends the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with a classical minimizer in order to support mixed binary optimization. Our results indicate that classical solvers are effective for our simulated Unit Commitment instances with fewer than 400 power generation units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T03:37:34Z)
• Variational Quantum Optimization with Multi-Basis Encodings [62.72309460291971]
  We introduce a new variational quantum algorithm that benefits from two innovations: multi-basis graph complexity and nonlinear activation functions. Our results in increased optimization performance, two increase in effective landscapes and a reduction in measurement progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T20:16:02Z)
• Accelerating variational quantum algorithms with multiple quantum processors [78.36566711543476]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have the potential of utilizing near-term quantum machines to gain certain computational advantages. Modern VQAs suffer from cumbersome computational overhead, hampered by the tradition of employing a solitary quantum processor to handle large data. Here we devise an efficient distributed optimization scheme, called QUDIO, to address this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T08:18:42Z)
• GEO: Enhancing Combinatorial Optimization with Classical and Quantum Generative Models [62.997667081978825]
  We introduce a new framework that leverages machine learning models known as generative models to solve optimization problems. We focus on a quantum-inspired version of GEO relying on tensor-network Born machines. We show its superior performance when the goal is to find the best minimum given a fixed budget for the number of function calls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T18:18:38Z)
• Warm-starting quantum optimization [6.832341432995627]
  We discuss how to warm-start quantum optimization with an initial state corresponding to the solution of a relaxation of an optimization problem. This allows the quantum algorithm to inherit the performance guarantees of the classical algorithm. It is straightforward to apply the same ideas to other randomized-rounding schemes and optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T18:00:09Z)
• Quantum vs. classical algorithms for solving the heat equation [0.04297070083645048]
  Quantum computers are predicted to outperform classical ones for solving partial differential equations, perhaps exponentially. Here we consider a prototypical PDE - the heat equation in a rectangular region - and compare in detail the complexities of ten classical and quantum algorithms for solving it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T13:57:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.