Pretraining with random noise for uncertainty calibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17411v2
• Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 12:34:23 GMT
• Title: Pretraining with random noise for uncertainty calibration
• Authors: Jeonghwan Cheon, Se-Bum Paik,
• Abstract summary: Many models exhibit hallucinations - confident yet inaccurate responses - due to miscalibrated confidence.<n>Our method, inspired by developmental neuroscience, addresses this issue by simply pretraining networks with random noise and labels.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty calibration is crucial for various machine learning applications, yet it remains challenging. Many models exhibit hallucinations - confident yet inaccurate responses - due to miscalibrated confidence. Here, we show that the common practice of random initialization in deep learning, often considered a standard technique, is an underlying cause of this miscalibration, leading to excessively high confidence in untrained networks. Our method, inspired by developmental neuroscience, addresses this issue by simply pretraining networks with random noise and labels, reducing overconfidence and bringing initial confidence levels closer to chance. This ensures optimal calibration, aligning confidence with accuracy during subsequent data training, without the need for additional pre- or post-processing. Pre-calibrated networks excel at identifying "unknown data," showing low confidence for out-of-distribution inputs, thereby resolving confidence miscalibration.

Related papers

• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Confidence Intervals and Simultaneous Confidence Bands Based on Deep Learning [0.36832029288386137]
  We provide a valid non-parametric bootstrap method that correctly disentangles data uncertainty from the noise inherent in the adopted optimization algorithm. The proposed ad-hoc method can be easily integrated into any deep neural network without interfering with the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T05:51:37Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Towards Calibrated Deep Clustering Network [60.71776081164377]
  In deep clustering, the estimated confidence for a sample belonging to a particular cluster greatly exceeds its actual prediction accuracy. We propose a novel dual-head (calibration head and clustering head) deep clustering model that can effectively calibrate the estimated confidence and the actual accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate the proposed calibrated deep clustering model not only surpasses state-of-the-art deep clustering methods by 10 times in terms of expected calibration error but also significantly outperforms them in terms of clustering accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T11:23:40Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Two Sides of Miscalibration: Identifying Over and Under-Confidence Prediction for Network Calibration [1.192436948211501]
  Proper confidence calibration of deep neural networks is essential for reliable predictions in safety-critical tasks. Miscalibration can lead to model over-confidence and/or under-confidence. We introduce a novel metric, a miscalibration score, to identify the overall and class-wise calibration status. We use the class-wise miscalibration score as a proxy to design a calibration technique that can tackle both over and under-confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T17:59:14Z)
• Learning Sample Difficulty from Pre-trained Models for Reliable Prediction [55.77136037458667]
  We propose to utilize large-scale pre-trained models to guide downstream model training with sample difficulty-aware entropy regularization. We simultaneously improve accuracy and uncertainty calibration across challenging benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T07:29:23Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruning [25.982037837953268]
  Deep neural networks (DNN) are prone to miscalibrated predictions, often exhibiting a mismatch between the predicted output and the associated confidence scores. We propose a novel regularization technique that can be used with classification losses, leading to state-of-the-art calibrated predictions at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:34:58Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• Bayesian Neural Network Versus Ex-Post Calibration For Prediction Uncertainty [0.2343856409260935]
  Probabilistic predictions from neural networks account for predictive uncertainty during classification. In practice most datasets are trained on non-probabilistic neural networks which by default do not capture this inherent uncertainty. A plausible alternative to the calibration approach is to use Bayesian neural networks, which directly models a predictive distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T07:22:19Z)
• Confidence Calibration for Intent Detection via Hyperspherical Space and Rebalanced Accuracy-Uncertainty Loss [17.26964140836123]
  In some scenarios, users do not only care about the accuracy but also the confidence of model. We propose a model using the hyperspherical space and rebalanced accuracy-uncertainty loss. Our model outperforms the existing calibration methods and achieves a significant improvement on the calibration metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T12:01:33Z)
• Bayesian Confidence Calibration for Epistemic Uncertainty Modelling [4.358626952482686]
  We introduce a framework to obtain confidence estimates in conjunction with an uncertainty of the calibration method. We achieve state-of-the-art calibration performance for object detection calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T10:53:16Z)
• Learning to Cascade: Confidence Calibration for Improving the Accuracy and Computational Cost of Cascade Inference Systems [2.28438857884398]
  Deep neural networks are highly accurate but known to be overconfident. It is not clear whether confidence scores can improve the performance of systems that use confidence scores. We propose a new confidence calibration method, Learning to Cascade.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T07:09:09Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functions [121.10450359856242]
  We develop a frequentist procedure that utilizes influence functions of a model's loss functional to construct a jackknife (or leave-one-out) estimator of predictive confidence intervals. The DJ satisfies (1) and (2), is applicable to a wide range of deep learning models, is easy to implement, and can be applied in a post-hoc fashion without interfering with model training or compromising its accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T13:36:52Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Binary Classification from Positive Data with Skewed Confidence [85.18941440826309]
  Positive-confidence (Pconf) classification is a promising weakly-supervised learning method. In practice, the confidence may be skewed by bias arising in an annotation process. We introduce the parameterized model of the skewed confidence, and propose the method for selecting the hyper parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T00:04:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.