Look Ahead Text Understanding and LLM Stitching

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17836v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 03:32:32 GMT
• Title: Look Ahead Text Understanding and LLM Stitching
• Authors: Junlin Julian Jiang, Xin Li,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a look ahead text understanding problem with look ahead section identification (LASI) as an example. We tackle the problem using transformer-based LLMs. We argue that both bidirectional contextual information (e.g., BERT) and unidirectional predictive ability (e.g., GPT) will benefit the task.
• Score: 4.431087385310259
• License:
• Abstract: This paper proposes a look ahead text understanding problem with look ahead section identification (LASI) as an example. This problem may appear in generative AI as well as human interactions, where we want to understand the direction of a developing text or conversation. We tackle the problem using transformer-based LLMs. We show that LASI is more challenging than classic section identification (SI). We argue that both bidirectional contextual information (e.g., BERT) and unidirectional predictive ability (e.g., GPT) will benefit the task. We propose two approaches to stitch together BERT and GPT. Experiments show that our approach outperforms the established models, especially when there is noise in the text (which is often the case for developing text in generative AI). Our paper sheds light on other look ahead text understanding tasks that are important to social media, such as look ahead sentiment classification, and points out the opportunities to leverage pre-trained LLMs through stitching.

Related papers

• Leveraging Explainable AI for LLM Text Attribution: Differentiating Human-Written and Multiple LLMs-Generated Text [1.1137087573421256]
  This study aims to support efforts to detect and identify textual content generated using Generative AI Large Language Models. We leverage several machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest (RF), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) to understand the important features in attribution. Our method is divided into 1) binary classification to differentiate between human-written and AI-text, and 2) multi classification, to differentiate between human-written text and the text generated by the five different LLM tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T18:46:53Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
  We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework. This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings. Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
• GigaCheck: Detecting LLM-generated Content [72.27323884094953]
  In this work, we investigate the task of generated text detection by proposing the GigaCheck. Our research explores two approaches: (i) distinguishing human-written texts from LLM-generated ones, and (ii) detecting LLM-generated intervals in Human-Machine collaborative texts. Specifically, we use a fine-tuned general-purpose LLM in conjunction with a DETR-like detection model, adapted from computer vision, to localize AI-generated intervals within text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T08:30:55Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Texts: Not Just "AI vs Humans" and Explainability is Complicated [8.77447722226144]
  We introduce a novel ternary text classification scheme, adding an "undecided" category for texts that could be attributed to either source. This research shifts the paradigm from merely classifying to explaining machine-generated texts, emphasizing need for detectors to provide clear and understandable explanations to users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T11:11:47Z)
• A Text is Worth Several Tokens: Text Embedding from LLMs Secretly Aligns Well with The Key Tokens [20.37803751979975]
  When feeding a text into a large language model-based embedder, the obtained text embedding will be able to be aligned with the key tokens in the input text. We show that this phenomenon is universal and is not affected by model architecture, training strategy, and embedding method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T08:55:12Z)
• VLLMs Provide Better Context for Emotion Understanding Through Common Sense Reasoning [66.23296689828152]
  We leverage the capabilities of Vision-and-Large-Language Models to enhance in-context emotion classification. In the first stage, we propose prompting VLLMs to generate descriptions in natural language of the subject's apparent emotion. In the second stage, the descriptions are used as contextual information and, along with the image input, are used to train a transformer-based architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T15:09:15Z)
• Unsupervised Text Style Transfer via LLMs and Attention Masking with Multi-way Interactions [18.64326057581588]
  Unsupervised Text Style Transfer (UTST) has emerged as a critical task within the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP) We propose four ways of interactions, that are pipeline framework with tuned orders; knowledge distillation from Large Language Models (LLMs) to attention masking model; in-context learning with constructed parallel examples. We empirically show these multi-way interactions can improve the baselines in certain perspective of style strength, content preservation and text fluency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T09:28:02Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• Concept-Guided Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Pairwise Comparison Scoring of Texts with Large Language Models [3.656114607436271]
  Existing text scoring methods require a large corpus, struggle with short texts, or require hand-labeled data. We develop a text scoring framework that leverages generative large language models (LLMs) We apply this approach to better understand speech reflecting aversion to specific political parties on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T15:34:37Z)
• SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detection [62.3792779440284]
  We introduce a sentence-level detection challenge by synthesizing documents polished with large language models (LLMs) We then propose textbfSequence textbfX (Check) textbfGPT, a novel method that utilizes log probability lists from white-box LLMs as features for sentence-level AIGT detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:18:53Z)
• Towards AGI in Computer Vision: Lessons Learned from GPT and Large Language Models [98.72986679502871]
  Chat systems powered by large language models (LLMs) emerge and rapidly become a promising direction to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI) But the path towards AGI in computer vision (CV) remains unclear. We imagine a pipeline that puts a CV algorithm in world-scale, interactable environments, pre-trains it to predict future frames with respect to its action, and then fine-tunes it with instruction to accomplish various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T17:15:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.