Robustness Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control Against Action Perturbations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18781v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:02:22 GMT
• Title: Robustness Evaluation of Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control Against Action Perturbations
• Authors: Shingo Ayabe, Takuto Otomo, Hiroshi Kera, Kazuhiko Kawamoto,
• Abstract summary: offline reinforcement learning is particularly promising for robot control applications. robustness against real-world challenges, such as joint actuator faults in robots, remains a critical concern. This study evaluates the robustness of existing offline reinforcement learning methods using legged robots from OpenAI Gym.
• Score: 4.849820402342814
• License:
• Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning, which learns solely from datasets without environmental interaction, has gained attention. This approach, similar to traditional online deep reinforcement learning, is particularly promising for robot control applications. Nevertheless, its robustness against real-world challenges, such as joint actuator faults in robots, remains a critical concern. This study evaluates the robustness of existing offline reinforcement learning methods using legged robots from OpenAI Gym based on average episodic rewards. For robustness evaluation, we simulate failures by incorporating both random and adversarial perturbations, representing worst-case scenarios, into the joint torque signals. Our experiments show that existing offline reinforcement learning methods exhibit significant vulnerabilities to these action perturbations and are more vulnerable than online reinforcement learning methods, highlighting the need for more robust approaches in this field.

Related papers

• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• Benchmarking Offline Reinforcement Learning on Real-Robot Hardware [35.29390454207064]
  Dexterous manipulation in particular remains an open problem in its general form. We propose a benchmark including a large collection of data for offline learning from a dexterous manipulation platform on two tasks. We evaluate prominent open-sourced offline reinforcement learning algorithms on the datasets and provide a reproducible experimental setup for offline reinforcement learning on real systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T17:29:49Z)
• Bridging Active Exploration and Uncertainty-Aware Deployment Using Probabilistic Ensemble Neural Network Dynamics [11.946807588018595]
  This paper presents a unified model-based reinforcement learning framework that bridges active exploration and uncertainty-aware deployment. The two opposing tasks of exploration and deployment are optimized through state-of-the-art sampling-based MPC. We conduct experiments on both autonomous vehicles and wheeled robots, showing promising results for both exploration and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T17:20:12Z)
• Revisiting the Adversarial Robustness-Accuracy Tradeoff in Robot Learning [121.9708998627352]
  Recent work has shown that, in practical robot learning applications, the effects of adversarial training do not pose a fair trade-off. This work revisits the robustness-accuracy trade-off in robot learning by analyzing if recent advances in robust training methods and theory can make adversarial training suitable for real-world robot applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T08:12:15Z)
• Where Did You Learn That From? Surprising Effectiveness of Membership Inference Attacks Against Temporally Correlated Data in Deep Reinforcement Learning [114.9857000195174]
  A major challenge to widespread industrial adoption of deep reinforcement learning is the potential vulnerability to privacy breaches. We propose an adversarial attack framework tailored for testing the vulnerability of deep reinforcement learning algorithms to membership inference attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T23:44:57Z)
• Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning [3.9258421820410225]
  We review the recent advances made in using machine learning to achieve safe decision making under uncertainties. Our review includes: learning-based control approaches that safely improve performance by learning the uncertain dynamics. We highlight some of the open challenges that will drive the field of robot learning in the coming years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T14:22:02Z)
• Adversarial Training is Not Ready for Robot Learning [55.493354071227174]
  Adversarial training is an effective method to train deep learning models that are resilient to norm-bounded perturbations. We show theoretically and experimentally that neural controllers obtained via adversarial training are subjected to three types of defects. Our results suggest that adversarial training is not yet ready for robot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T07:51:31Z)
• HYDRA: Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural Networks [58.061681100058316]
  Deep learning faces two key challenges: lack of robustness against adversarial attacks and large neural network size. We propose to make pruning techniques aware of the robust training objective and let the training objective guide the search for which connections to prune. We demonstrate that our approach, titled HYDRA, achieves compressed networks with state-of-the-art benign and robust accuracy, simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T19:54:53Z)
• Enhanced Adversarial Strategically-Timed Attacks against Deep Reinforcement Learning [91.13113161754022]
  We introduce timing-based adversarial strategies against a DRL-based navigation system by jamming in physical noise patterns on the selected time frames. Our experimental results show that the adversarial timing attacks can lead to a significant performance drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T21:39:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.