Related papers: Self-directed online information search can affect policy support: a randomized encouragement design with digital behavioral data

Related papers

The Knowledge Gap in a High-Choice Media Environment: Experimental Evidence from Online Search [1.1666234644810893]
We study how individuals with varying education levels acquire policy-specific knowledge through online search.<n>We estimate both intention-to-treat (ITT) and local average treatment effects (LATE) of information seeking on post-search knowledge outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T10:52:32Z)
Promoting Reliable Knowledge about Climate Change: A Systematic Review of Effective Measures to Resist Manipulation on Social Media [11.476777375043381]
We find that commonly recommended approaches to addressing manipulation about climate change include corrective information sharing and education campaigns targeting media literacy. We locate research gaps that include the lack of attention to large commercial and political entities involved in generating and disseminating manipulation. Evidence drawn from many studies demonstrates an emerging consensus about policies required to promote reliable knowledge about climate change and resist manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T10:58:38Z)
A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing. Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z)
PropaInsight: Toward Deeper Understanding of Propaganda in Terms of Techniques, Appeals, and Intent [71.20471076045916]
Propaganda plays a critical role in shaping public opinion and fueling disinformation. Propainsight systematically dissects propaganda into techniques, arousal appeals, and underlying intent. Propagaze combines human-annotated data with high-quality synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T06:28:18Z)
An engine not a camera: Measuring performative power of online search [23.779329697527054]
We design and execute an experiment to measure the performative power of online search providers. We use the Google Shopping antitrust investigation as a case study. We envision our work to serve as a blueprint for how the recent definition of performative power can help integrate quantitative insights from online experiments with future investigations into the economic power of digital platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T13:31:12Z)
A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures [50.987594546912725]
Despite a growing corpus of research in AI privacy and explainability, there is little attention on privacy-preserving model explanations. This article presents the first thorough survey about privacy attacks on model explanations and their countermeasures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-31T12:44:48Z)
HearHere: Mitigating Echo Chambers in News Consumption through an AI-based Web System [23.289938642423298]
We present HearHere, an AI-based web system designed to help users accommodate information and opinions from diverse perspectives. Our findings highlight the importance of providing political stance information and quantifying users' political status as a means to mitigate political polarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T10:37:14Z)
Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
Understanding the Humans Behind Online Misinformation: An Observational Study Through the Lens of the COVID-19 Pandemic [12.873747057824833]
We conduct a large-scale observational study analyzing over 32 million COVID-19 tweets and 16 million historical timeline tweets. We focus on understanding the behavior and psychology of users disseminating misinformation during COVID-19 and its relationship with the historical inclinations towards sharing misinformation on Non-COVID domains before the pandemic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T16:42:53Z)
Online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones [0.32207415805366035]
This work focuses on understanding how young people perceive and deal with false information. Our results suggest that online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones. This work provides a principled understanding of how young people perceive and distinguish true and false pieces of information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T09:43:32Z)
Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
Information Retention in the Multi-platform Sharing of Science [1.4626565477022566]
We examine information retention in the over 4 million online posts referencing 9,765 of the most-mentioned scientific articles. We find a strong tendency towards low levels of information retention, following a distinct trajectory of loss. sequences involving more platforms tend to be associated with higher information retention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-27T22:28:48Z)
How we browse: Measurement and analysis of digital behavior [25.760665908194888]
We collect data from 31 participants continuously for 14 days and self-reported browsing patterns. We find significant differences in level of activity based on user age, but not based on race or gender. Users significantly overestimate the time they spend online, but have relatively accurate perceptions of how they spend their time online.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-15T14:08:30Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
Face Off: Polarized Public Opinions on Personal Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic [77.34726150561087]
A series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to have contributed to the polarization of face masks. We propose a novel approach to accurately gauge public sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19. We find two key policy-shift events contributed to statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and Democrats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-31T18:52:41Z)
Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)
Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.