Investigating the Impact of Data Selection Strategies on Language Model Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03826v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 14:38:49 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Impact of Data Selection Strategies on Language Model Performance
• Authors: Jiayao Gu, Liting Chen, Yihong Li,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the effects of different data selection methods and feature types on model performance. We evaluate whether selecting data subsets can influence downstream tasks, whether n-gram features improve alignment with target distributions, and whether embedding-based neural features provide complementary benefits.
• Score: 1.0013553984400492
• License:
• Abstract: Data selection is critical for enhancing the performance of language models, particularly when aligning training datasets with a desired target distribution. This study explores the effects of different data selection methods and feature types on model performance. We evaluate whether selecting data subsets can influence downstream tasks, whether n-gram features improve alignment with target distributions, and whether embedding-based neural features provide complementary benefits. Through comparative experiments using baseline random selection methods and distribution aligned approaches, we provide insights into the interplay between data selection strategies and model training efficacy. All code for this study can be found on \href{https://github.com/jgu13/HIR-Hybrid-Importance-Resampling-for-Language-Models}{github repository}.

Related papers

• Diversify and Conquer: Diversity-Centric Data Selection with Iterative Refinement [8.509688686402438]
  Finetuning large language models on instruction data is crucial for enhancing pre-trained knowledge and improving instruction-following capabilities. This work addresses the question: How can we determine the optimal subset of data for effective training? Our method employs k-means clustering to ensure the selected subset effectively represents the full dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:25:31Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels [81.01744199870043]
  Standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. We find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. Our framework avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T17:22:00Z)
• Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context Learning [66.11652803887284]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to perform a wide range of tasks using in-context learning (ICL) In this work, we first revisit the factors contributing to this variance from both data and model aspects, and find that the choice of demonstration is both data- and model-dependent. We propose a data- and model-dependent demonstration selection method, textbfTopK + ConE, based on the assumption that textitthe performance of a demonstration positively correlates with its contribution to the model's understanding of the test samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T16:25:27Z)
• A Contrast Based Feature Selection Algorithm for High-dimensional Data set in Machine Learning [9.596923373834093]
  We propose a novel filter feature selection method, ContrastFS, which selects discriminative features based on the discrepancies features shown between different classes. We validate effectiveness and efficiency of our approach on several widely studied benchmark datasets, results show that the new method performs favorably with negligible computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T05:32:35Z)
• Influence Scores at Scale for Efficient Language Data Sampling [3.072340427031969]
  "influence scores" are used to identify important subsets of data. In this paper, we explore the applicability of influence scores in language classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T20:19:22Z)
• An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
  Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models. We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z)
• Optimal transport framework for efficient prototype selection [21.620708125860066]
  We develop an optimal transport (OT) based framework to select informative examples that best represent a given target dataset. We show that our objective function enjoys a key property of submodularity and propose a parallelizable greedy method that is both computationally fast and possess deterministic approximation guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T10:50:14Z)
• Model-specific Data Subsampling with Influence Functions [37.64859614131316]
  We develop a model-specific data subsampling strategy that improves over random sampling whenever training points have varying influence. Specifically, we leverage influence functions to guide our selection strategy, proving theoretically, and demonstrating empirically that our approach quickly selects high-quality models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T12:10:28Z)
• Dynamic Data Selection and Weighting for Iterative Back-Translation [116.14378571769045]
  We propose a curriculum learning strategy for iterative back-translation models. We evaluate our models on domain adaptation, low-resource, and high-resource MT settings. Experimental results demonstrate that our methods achieve improvements of up to 1.8 BLEU points over competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T19:49:58Z)
• Improving Multi-Turn Response Selection Models with Complementary Last-Utterance Selection by Instance Weighting [84.9716460244444]
  We consider utilizing the underlying correlation in the data resource itself to derive different kinds of supervision signals. We conduct extensive experiments in two public datasets and obtain significant improvement in both datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T06:29:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.