Constraints as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning for Robots without Reward Functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04228v2
• Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 01:35:56 GMT
• Title: Constraints as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning for Robots without Reward Functions
• Authors: Yu Ishihara, Noriaki Takasugi, Kotaro Kawakami, Masaya Kinoshita, Kazumi Aoyama,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning has become an essential algorithm for generating complex robotic behaviors. To learn such behaviors, it is necessary to design a reward function that describes the task. In this paper, we propose the concept of Constraints as Rewards (CaR)
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning has become an essential algorithm for generating complex robotic behaviors. However, to learn such behaviors, it is necessary to design a reward function that describes the task, which often consists of multiple objectives that needs to be balanced. This tuning process is known as reward engineering and typically involves extensive trial-and-error. In this paper, to avoid this trial-and-error process, we propose the concept of Constraints as Rewards (CaR). CaR formulates the task objective using multiple constraint functions instead of a reward function and solves a reinforcement learning problem with constraints using the Lagrangian-method. By adopting this approach, different objectives are automatically balanced, because Lagrange multipliers serves as the weights among the objectives. In addition, we will demonstrate that constraints, expressed as inequalities, provide an intuitive interpretation of the optimization target designed for the task. We apply the proposed method to the standing-up motion generation task of a six-wheeled-telescopic-legged robot and demonstrate that the proposed method successfully acquires the target behavior, even though it is challenging to learn with manually designed reward functions.

Related papers

• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world. Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences. We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• CLIP-Motion: Learning Reward Functions for Robotic Actions Using Consecutive Observations [1.03590082373586]
  This paper presents a novel method for learning reward functions for robotic motions by harnessing the power of a CLIP-based model. Our approach circumvents this challenge by capitalizing on CLIP's capability to process both state features and image inputs effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T19:48:03Z)
• Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimization [23.92721220310242]
  We introduce a new framework that integrates auxiliary rewards reflecting a designer's domain knowledge with the environment's primary rewards. We evaluate our method's efficacy on a diverse set of tasks, from small-scale experiments to high-dimensional control challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T13:45:07Z)
• Leveraging Sequentiality in Reinforcement Learning from a Single Demonstration [68.94506047556412]
  We propose to leverage a sequential bias to learn control policies for complex robotic tasks using a single demonstration. We show that DCIL-II can solve with unprecedented sample efficiency some challenging simulated tasks such as humanoid locomotion and stand-up.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T10:28:40Z)
• Discrete Factorial Representations as an Abstraction for Goal Conditioned Reinforcement Learning [99.38163119531745]
  We show that applying a discretizing bottleneck can improve performance in goal-conditioned RL setups. We experimentally prove the expected return on out-of-distribution goals, while still allowing for specifying goals with expressive structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T03:31:43Z)
• Reaching Through Latent Space: From Joint Statistics to Path Planning in Manipulation [26.38185646091712]
  We present a novel approach to path planning for robotic manipulators. Paths are produced via iterative optimisation in the latent space of a generative model of robot poses. Our models are trained in a task-agnostic manner on randomly sampled robot poses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T07:25:21Z)
• Direct Behavior Specification via Constrained Reinforcement Learning [12.679780444702573]
  CMDPs can be adapted to solve goal-based tasks while adhering to a set of behavioral constraints. We evaluate this framework on a set of continuous control tasks relevant to the application of Reinforcement Learning for NPC design in video games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T21:12:28Z)
• MURAL: Meta-Learning Uncertainty-Aware Rewards for Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning [65.52675802289775]
  We show that an uncertainty aware classifier can solve challenging reinforcement learning problems. We propose a novel method for computing the normalized maximum likelihood (NML) distribution. We show that the resulting algorithm has a number of intriguing connections to both count-based exploration methods and prior algorithms for learning reward functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T08:19:57Z)
• Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational Inference [95.82770132618862]
  We discuss a new perspective on reinforcement learning, recasting it as the problem of inferring actions that achieve desired outcomes, rather than a problem of maximizing rewards. To solve the resulting outcome-directed inference problem, we establish a novel variational inference formulation that allows us to derive a well-shaped reward function. We empirically demonstrate that this method eliminates the need to design reward functions and leads to effective goal-directed behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T18:16:21Z)
• Automatic Curriculum Learning through Value Disagreement [95.19299356298876]
  Continually solving new, unsolved tasks is the key to learning diverse behaviors. In the multi-task domain, where an agent needs to reach multiple goals, the choice of training goals can largely affect sample efficiency. We propose setting up an automatic curriculum for goals that the agent needs to solve. We evaluate our method across 13 multi-goal robotic tasks and 5 navigation tasks, and demonstrate performance gains over current state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T03:58:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.