Gaussian Universality for Diffusion Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07741v3
• Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 03:57:28 GMT
• Title: Gaussian Universality for Diffusion Models
• Authors: Reza Ghane, Anthony Bao, Danil Akhtiamov, Babak Hassibi,
• Abstract summary: We show that the test error of a generalized linear model $f(mathbfW)$ trained for a classification task on the diffusion data matches the test error of $f(mathbfW)$ trained on the Gaussian Mixture.<n>We also show that for any $1$- Lipschitz scalar function $phi$, $phi(mathbfx)$ is close to $mathbbE phi(mathbfx)$ with high probability for $mathbfx$ sampled from the conditional diffusion model
• Score: 13.722991812691054
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate Gaussian Universality for data distributions generated via diffusion models. By Gaussian Universality we mean that the test error of a generalized linear model $f(\mathbf{W})$ trained for a classification task on the diffusion data matches the test error of $f(\mathbf{W})$ trained on the Gaussian Mixture with matching means and covariances per class.In other words, the test error depends only on the first and second order statistics of the diffusion-generated data in the linear setting. As a corollary, the analysis of the test error for linear classifiers can be reduced to Gaussian data from diffusion-generated data. Analysing the performance of models trained on synthetic data is a pertinent problem due to the surge of methods such as \cite{sehwag2024stretchingdollardiffusiontraining}. Moreover, we show that, for any $1$- Lipschitz scalar function $\phi$, $\phi(\mathbf{x})$ is close to $\mathbb{E} \phi(\mathbf{x})$ with high probability for $\mathbf{x}$ sampled from the conditional diffusion model corresponding to each class. Finally, we note that current approaches for proving universality do not apply to diffusion-generated data as the covariance matrices of the data tend to have vanishing minimum singular values, contrary to the assumption made in the literature. This leaves extending previous mathematical universality results as an intriguing open question.

Related papers

• Understanding Generalization in Diffusion Models via Probability Flow Distance [7.675910526644439]
  We introduce probability flow distance ($texttPFD$) to measure distributional generalization.<n>We empirically uncover several key generalization behaviors in diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:23:50Z)
• Resolving Memorization in Empirical Diffusion Model for Manifold Data in High-Dimensional Spaces [5.716752583983991]
  When the data distribution consists of n points, empirical diffusion models tend to reproduce existing data points.<n>This work shows that the memorization issue can be solved simply by applying an inertia update at the end of the empirical diffusion simulation.<n>We demonstrate that the distribution of samples from this model approximates the true data distribution on a $C2$ manifold of dimension $d$, within a Wasserstein-1 distance of order $O(n-frac2d+4)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T09:40:41Z)
• Outsourced diffusion sampling: Efficient posterior inference in latent spaces of generative models [65.71506381302815]
  We propose amortize the cost of sampling from a posterior distribution of the form $p(mathbfxmidmathbfy) propto p_theta(mathbfx)$.<n>For many models and constraints, the posterior in noise space is smoother than in data space, making it more suitable for amortized inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T19:49:54Z)
• Theory on Score-Mismatched Diffusion Models and Zero-Shot Conditional Samplers [49.97755400231656]
  We present the first performance guarantee with explicit dimensional general score-mismatched diffusion samplers. We show that score mismatches result in an distributional bias between the target and sampling distributions, proportional to the accumulated mismatch between the target and training distributions. This result can be directly applied to zero-shot conditional samplers for any conditional model, irrespective of measurement noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:42:12Z)
• Inverse Entropic Optimal Transport Solves Semi-supervised Learning via Data Likelihood Maximization [72.69498649272347]
  conditional distributions is a central problem in machine learning.<n>We propose a new paradigm that integrates both paired and unpaired data.<n>We show that our approach can theoretically recover true conditional distributions with arbitrarily small error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:12:59Z)
• A Sharp Convergence Theory for The Probability Flow ODEs of Diffusion Models [45.60426164657739]
  We develop non-asymptotic convergence theory for a diffusion-based sampler. We prove that $d/varepsilon$ are sufficient to approximate the target distribution to within $varepsilon$ total-variation distance. Our results also characterize how $ell$ score estimation errors affect the quality of the data generation processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T09:02:24Z)
• Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data [86.48154162485712]
  We study the theory of scaling laws in an infinite dimensional linear regression setup.<n>We show that the reducible part of the test error is $Theta(-(a-1) + N-(a-1)/a)$.<n>Our theory is consistent with the empirical neural scaling laws and verified by numerical simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:53:29Z)
• Amortizing intractable inference in diffusion models for vision, language, and control [89.65631572949702]
  This paper studies amortized sampling of the posterior over data, $mathbfxsim prm post(mathbfx)propto p(mathbfx)r(mathbfx)$, in a model that consists of a diffusion generative model prior $p(mathbfx)$ and a black-box constraint or function $r(mathbfx)$.<n>We prove the correctness of a data-free learning objective, relative trajectory balance, for training a diffusion model that samples from
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T16:18:46Z)
• Generative inpainting of incomplete Euclidean distance matrices of trajectories generated by a fractional Brownian motion [46.1232919707345]
  Fractional Brownian motion (fBm) features both randomness and strong scale-free correlations. Here we examine a zoo of diffusion-based inpainting methods on a specific dataset of corrupted images. We find that the conditional diffusion generation readily reproduces the built-in correlations of fBm paths in different memory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:22:16Z)
• A Note on the Convergence of Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models [3.1767625261233046]
  We derive a quantitative upper bound on the Wasserstein distance between the data-generating distribution and the distribution learned by a diffusion model. Unlike previous works in this field, our result does not make assumptions on the learned score function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T20:29:58Z)
• Nearly $d$-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localization [40.808942894229325]
  We provide the first convergence bounds which are linear in the data dimension. We show that diffusion models require at most $tilde O(fracd log2(1/delta)varepsilon2)$ steps to approximate an arbitrary distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:01:14Z)
• Class-Balancing Diffusion Models [57.38599989220613]
  Class-Balancing Diffusion Models (CBDM) are trained with a distribution adjustment regularizer as a solution. Our method benchmarked the generation results on CIFAR100/CIFAR100LT dataset and shows outstanding performance on the downstream recognition task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T20:00:14Z)
• Diffusion Models are Minimax Optimal Distribution Estimators [49.47503258639454]
  We provide the first rigorous analysis on approximation and generalization abilities of diffusion modeling. We show that when the true density function belongs to the Besov space and the empirical score matching loss is properly minimized, the generated data distribution achieves the nearly minimax optimal estimation rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:31:55Z)
• Universality laws for Gaussian mixtures in generalized linear models [22.154969876570238]
  We investigate the joint statistics of the family of generalized linear estimators $(Theta_1, dots, Theta_M)$. This allow us to prove the universality of different quantities of interest, such as the training and generalization errors. We discuss the applications of our results to different machine learning tasks of interest, such as ensembling and uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T15:16:06Z)
• Are Gaussian data all you need? Extents and limits of universality in high-dimensional generalized linear estimation [24.933476324230377]
  We consider the problem of generalized linear estimation on Gaussian mixture data with labels given by a single-index model. Motivated by the recent stream of results on the universality of the test and training errors in generalized linear estimation, we ask ourselves the question: "when is a single Gaussian enough to characterize the error?"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T14:56:40Z)
• Data thinning for convolution-closed distributions [2.299914829977005]
  We propose data thinning, an approach for splitting an observation into two or more independent parts that sum to the original observation. We show that data thinning can be used to validate the results of unsupervised learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T02:47:41Z)
• Statistical Hypothesis Testing Based on Machine Learning: Large Deviations Analysis [15.605887551756933]
  We study the performance -- and specifically the rate at which the error probability converges to zero -- of Machine Learning (ML) classification techniques. We provide the mathematical conditions for a ML to exhibit error probabilities that vanish exponentially, say $sim expleft(-n,I + o(n) right) In other words, the classification error probability convergence to zero and its rate can be computed on a portion of the dataset available for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-22T08:30:10Z)
• Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors [98.16404662526101]
  We consider the problem of inferring high-dimensional data $mathbfx$ in a model that consists of a prior $p(mathbfx)$ and an auxiliary constraint $c(mathbfx,mathbfy)$. The structure of diffusion models allows us to perform approximate inference by iterating differentiation through the fixed denoising network enriched with different amounts of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T21:11:36Z)
• Gaussian Universality of Linear Classifiers with Random Labels in High-Dimension [24.503842578208268]
  We prove that data coming from a range of generative models in high-dimensions have the same minimum training loss as Gaussian data with corresponding data covariance. In particular, our theorem covers data created by an arbitrary mixture of homogeneous Gaussian clouds, as well as multi-modal generative neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T12:25:24Z)
• A Robust and Flexible EM Algorithm for Mixtures of Elliptical Distributions with Missing Data [71.9573352891936]
  This paper tackles the problem of missing data imputation for noisy and non-Gaussian data. A new EM algorithm is investigated for mixtures of elliptical distributions with the property of handling potential missing data. Experimental results on synthetic data demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is robust to outliers and can be used with non-Gaussian data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T10:01:37Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.