SpatialCoT: Advancing Spatial Reasoning through Coordinate Alignment and Chain-of-Thought for Embodied Task Planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10074v3
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 02:31:25 GMT
• Title: SpatialCoT: Advancing Spatial Reasoning through Coordinate Alignment and Chain-of-Thought for Embodied Task Planning
• Authors: Yuecheng Liu, Dafeng Chi, Shiguang Wu, Zhanguang Zhang, Yaochen Hu, Lingfeng Zhang, Yingxue Zhang, Shuang Wu, Tongtong Cao, Guowei Huang, Helong Huang, Guangjian Tian, Weichao Qiu, Xingyue Quan, Jianye Hao, Yuzheng Zhuang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach to bolster the spatial reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our approach comprises two stages: spatial coordinate bi-directional alignment, and chain-of-thought spatial grounding.<n>We evaluate our method on challenging navigation and manipulation tasks, both in simulation and real-world settings.
• Score: 42.487500113839666
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Spatial reasoning is an essential problem in embodied AI research. Efforts to enhance spatial reasoning abilities through supplementary spatial data and fine-tuning have proven limited and ineffective when addressing complex embodied tasks, largely due to their dependence on language-based outputs. While some approaches have introduced a point-based action space to mitigate this issue, they fall short in managing more intricate tasks within complex environments. This deficiency arises from their failure to fully exploit the inherent thinking and reasoning capabilities that are fundamental strengths of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). To address these limitations, we propose a novel approach named SpatialCoT, specifically designed to bolster the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs. Our approach comprises two stages: spatial coordinate bi-directional alignment, which aligns vision-language inputs with spatial coordinates, and chain-of-thought spatial grounding, which harnesses the reasoning capabilities of language models for advanced spatial reasoning. We evaluate SpatialCoT on challenging navigation and manipulation tasks, both in simulation and real-world settings. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art approaches in both tasks.

Related papers

• Q-function Decomposition with Intervention Semantics with Factored Action Spaces [51.01244229483353]
  We consider Q-functions defined over a lower dimensional projected subspace of the original action space, and study the condition for the unbiasedness of decomposed Q-functions. This leads to a general scheme which we call action decomposed reinforcement learning that uses the projected Q-functions to approximate the Q-function in standard model-free reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T05:26:51Z)
• A Call for New Recipes to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs [85.67171333213301]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in general vision-language tasks. Recent studies have exposed critical limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities. This deficiency in spatial reasoning significantly constrains MLLMs' ability to interact effectively with the physical world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:48:39Z)
• Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [14.442394137843923]
  We present a detailed analysis that first delineates the core elements of spatial reasoning. We then assesses the performance of these models in both synthetic and real-world images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T14:34:06Z)
• EmbodiedVSR: Dynamic Scene Graph-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Visual Spatial Tasks [24.41705039390567]
  EmbodiedVSR (Embodied Visual Spatial Reasoning) is a novel framework that integrates dynamic scene graph-guided Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. Our method enables zero-shot spatial reasoning without task-specific fine-tuning. Experiments demonstrate that our framework significantly outperforms existing MLLM-based methods in accuracy and reasoning coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T05:06:07Z)
• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration. These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areas [52.478956204238315]
  We study the spatial reasoning challenge from the lens of mechanistic interpretability. We observe that successful spatial reasoning correlates strongly with the model's ability to align its attention with actual object locations. Motivated by these findings, we propose ADAPTVIS to sharpen the attention on highly relevant regions when confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:57:03Z)
• Towards Robust and Realistic Human Pose Estimation via WiFi Signals [85.60557095666934]
  WiFi-based human pose estimation is a challenging task that bridges discrete and subtle WiFi signals to human skeletons.<n>This paper revisits this problem and reveals two critical yet overlooked issues: 1) cross-domain gap, i.e., due to significant variations between source-target domain pose distributions; and 2) structural fidelity gap, i.e., predicted skeletal poses manifest distorted topology.<n>This paper fills these gaps by reformulating the task into a novel two-phase framework dubbed DT-Pose: Domain-consistent representation learning and Topology-constrained Pose decoding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T09:38:22Z)
• SPHERE: A Hierarchical Evaluation on Spatial Perception and Reasoning for Vision-Language Models [7.518248471164635]
  We develop SPHERE, a hierarchical evaluation framework with a new human-annotated dataset to pinpoint model strengths and weaknesses.<n> Benchmark evaluation of state-of-the-art open-source models reveal significant shortcomings.<n>This work underscores the need for more advanced approaches to spatial understanding and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T09:10:55Z)
• Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Composite Spatial Reasoning [19.399925987942204]
  Vision language models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. Our evaluation reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs frequently generate implausible and incorrect responses to composite spatial reasoning problems. To address this, we explore an effective approach to enhance 2D spatial reasoning within VLMs by training the model solely on basic spatial capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z)
• VSP: Assessing the dual challenges of perception and reasoning in spatial planning tasks for VLMs [102.36953558562436]
  Vision language models (VLMs) are an exciting emerging class of language models (LMs) One understudied capability inVLMs is visual spatial planning. Our study introduces a benchmark that evaluates the spatial planning capability in these models in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T00:24:01Z)
• SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models [70.01883340129204]
  spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. We present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T01:06:34Z)
• Reframing Spatial Reasoning Evaluation in Language Models: A Real-World Simulation Benchmark for Qualitative Reasoning [4.422649561583363]
  We present a novel benchmark for assessing spatial reasoning in language models (LMs) It is grounded in realistic 3D simulation data, offering a series of diverse room layouts with various objects and their spatial relationships. A key contribution is our logic-based consistency-checking tool, which enables the assessment of multiple plausible solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T21:22:00Z)
• Improving Vision-and-Language Reasoning via Spatial Relations Modeling [30.477235227733928]
  Visual commonsense reasoning (VCR) is a challenging multi-modal task. The proposed method can guide the representations to maintain more spatial context. We achieve the state-of-the-art results on VCR and two other vision-and-language reasoning tasks VQA, and NLVR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:54:55Z)
• Cross-domain Imitation from Observations [50.669343548588294]
  Imitation learning seeks to circumvent the difficulty in designing proper reward functions for training agents by utilizing expert behavior. In this paper, we study the problem of how to imitate tasks when there exist discrepancies between the expert and agent MDP. We present a novel framework to learn correspondences across such domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T21:08:25Z)
• Weakly-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Controllable Behavior [126.04932929741538]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for learning to take actions to solve tasks. In many settings, an agent must winnow down the inconceivably large space of all possible tasks to the single task that it is currently being asked to solve. We introduce a framework for using weak supervision to automatically disentangle this semantically meaningful subspace of tasks from the enormous space of nonsensical "chaff" tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T17:50:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.