Selecting Critical Scenarios of DER Adoption in Distribution Grids Using Bayesian Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14118v1
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:20:30 GMT
- Title: Selecting Critical Scenarios of DER Adoption in Distribution Grids Using Bayesian Optimization
- Authors: Olivier Mulkin, Miguel Heleno, Mike Ludkovski,
- Abstract summary: We develop a new methodology to select scenarios of DER adoption most critical for distribution grids.<n>We propose a highly efficient search framework based on multi-objective Bayesian Optimization.<n>Case studies on realistic feeders with 200-400 buses demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of our approach.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We develop a new methodology to select scenarios of DER adoption most critical for distribution grids. Anticipating risks of future voltage and line flow violations due to additional PV adopters is central for utility investment planning but continues to rely on deterministic or ad hoc scenario selection. We propose a highly efficient search framework based on multi-objective Bayesian Optimization. We treat underlying grid stress metrics as computationally expensive black-box functions, approximated via Gaussian Process surrogates and design an acquisition function based on probability of scenarios being Pareto-critical across a collection of line- and bus-based violation objectives. Our approach provides a statistical guarantee and offers an order of magnitude speed-up relative to a conservative exhaustive search. Case studies on realistic feeders with 200-400 buses demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of our approach.
Related papers
- Preference-Guided Diffusion for Multi-Objective Offline Optimization [64.08326521234228]
We propose a preference-guided diffusion model for offline multi-objective optimization.
Our guidance is a preference model trained to predict the probability that one design dominates another.
Our results highlight the effectiveness of classifier-guided diffusion models in generating diverse and high-quality solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T16:49:38Z) - Online Conformal Probabilistic Numerics via Adaptive Edge-Cloud Offloading [52.499838151272016]
This work introduces a new method to calibrate the HPD sets produced by PLS with the aim of guaranteeing long-term coverage requirements.
The proposed method, referred to as online conformal prediction-PLS (OCP-PLS), assumes sporadic feedback from cloud to edge.
The validity of OCP-PLS is verified via experiments that bring insights into trade-offs between coverage, prediction set size, and cloud usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-18T17:30:26Z) - Representation-based Reward Modeling for Efficient Safety Alignment of Large Language Model [84.00480999255628]
Reinforcement Learning algorithms for safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) encounter the challenge of distribution shift.
Current approaches typically address this issue through online sampling from the target policy.
We propose a new framework that leverages the model's intrinsic safety judgment capability to extract reward signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T06:40:34Z) - Enhanced Route Planning with Calibrated Uncertainty Set [7.7856491832713415]
We introduce the Conformalized Quantile Regression for Graph Autoencoders (CQR-GAE), which leverages the conformal prediction technique to offer a coverage guarantee.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by applying the CQR-GAE model to a real-world traffic scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T06:31:42Z) - Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric.
We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios.
Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z) - Learning-assisted Stochastic Capacity Expansion Planning: A Bayesian Optimization Approach [3.124884279860061]
Large-scale capacity expansion problems (CEPs) are central to costeffective decarbonization of regional energy systems.
Here, we propose a learning-assisted approximate solution method to tractably solve two-stage CEPs.
We show that our approach yields an estimated cost savings of up to 3.8% in comparison to series aggregation approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T01:40:58Z) - Risk-Controlling Model Selection via Guided Bayesian Optimization [35.53469358591976]
We find a configuration that adheres to user-specified limits on certain risks while being useful with respect to other conflicting metrics.
Our method identifies a set of optimal configurations residing in a designated region of interest.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a range of tasks with multiple desiderata, including low error rates, equitable predictions, handling spurious correlations, managing rate and distortion in generative models, and reducing computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T07:29:44Z) - Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences.
Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods.
We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z) - Extreme Scenario Selection in Day-Ahead Power Grid Operational Planning [0.0]
We propose and analyze the application of statistical functional depth metrics for the selection of extreme scenarios in day-ahead grid planning.
Our primary motivation is screening of probabilistic scenarios for realized load and renewable generation, in order to identify scenarios most relevant for operational risk mitigation.
We investigate a range of functional depth measures, as well as a range of operational risks, including load shedding, operational costs, reserves shortfall and variable renewable energy curtailment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T05:09:09Z) - Learning Regions of Interest for Bayesian Optimization with Adaptive
Level-Set Estimation [84.0621253654014]
We propose a framework, called BALLET, which adaptively filters for a high-confidence region of interest.
We show theoretically that BALLET can efficiently shrink the search space, and can exhibit a tighter regret bound than standard BO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T09:45:47Z) - Generalizing Bayesian Optimization with Decision-theoretic Entropies [102.82152945324381]
We consider a generalization of Shannon entropy from work in statistical decision theory.
We first show that special cases of this entropy lead to popular acquisition functions used in BO procedures.
We then show how alternative choices for the loss yield a flexible family of acquisition functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-04T04:43:58Z) - A Robust Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Framework Considering
Input Uncertainty [0.0]
In real-life applications like engineering design, the designer often wants to take multiple objectives as well as input uncertainty into account.
We introduce a novel Bayesian optimization framework to efficiently perform multi-objective optimization considering input uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-25T17:45:26Z) - Application-Driven Learning: A Closed-Loop Prediction and Optimization Approach Applied to Dynamic Reserves and Demand Forecasting [41.94295877935867]
We present application-driven learning, a new closed-loop framework in which the processes of forecasting and decision-making are merged and co-optimized.
We show that the proposed methodology is scalable and yields consistently better performance than the standard open-loop approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T02:43:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.