Unmasking Conversational Bias in AI Multiagent Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14844v2
• Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 14:32:41 GMT
• Title: Unmasking Conversational Bias in AI Multiagent Systems
• Authors: Erica Coppolillo, Giuseppe Manco, Luca Maria Aiello,
• Abstract summary: biases that may arise in multi-agent systems involving generative models remain under-researched. We present a framework designed to quantify biases within multi-agent systems of conversational Large Language Models. The bias observed in the echo-chamber experiment remains undetected by current state-of-the-art bias detection methods.
• Score: 1.0705399532413618
• License:
• Abstract: Detecting biases in the outputs produced by generative models is essential to reduce the potential risks associated with their application in critical settings. However, the majority of existing methodologies for identifying biases in generated text consider the models in isolation and neglect their contextual applications. Specifically, the biases that may arise in multi-agent systems involving generative models remain under-researched. To address this gap, we present a framework designed to quantify biases within multi-agent systems of conversational Large Language Models (LLMs). Our approach involves simulating small echo chambers, where pairs of LLMs, initialized with aligned perspectives on a polarizing topic, engage in discussions. Contrary to expectations, we observe significant shifts in the stance expressed in the generated messages, particularly within echo chambers where all agents initially express conservative viewpoints, in line with the well-documented political bias of many LLMs toward liberal positions. Crucially, the bias observed in the echo-chamber experiment remains undetected by current state-of-the-art bias detection methods that rely on questionnaires. This highlights a critical need for the development of a more sophisticated toolkit for bias detection and mitigation for AI multi-agent systems. The code to perform the experiments is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LLMsConversationalBias-7725.

Related papers

• Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
  Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly. General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities. Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z)
• Evaluating and Mitigating Social Bias for Large Language Models in Open-ended Settings [13.686732204665738]
  We extend an existing BBQ dataset by incorporating fill-in-the-blank and short-answer question types. Our finding reveals that LLMs produce responses that are more biased against certain protected attributes, like age and socio-economic status. Our debiasing approach combined zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought could significantly reduce the level of bias to almost 0.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T01:29:47Z)
• Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adopted across a wide range of tasks. Recent research indicates that LLMs can harbor implicit biases even when they pass explicit bias evaluations. This study highlights that newer or larger language models do not automatically exhibit reduced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T03:43:18Z)
• MindScope: Exploring cognitive biases in large language models through Multi-Agent Systems [12.245537894266803]
  We introduce the 'MindScope' dataset, which distinctively integrates static and dynamic elements. The static component comprises 5,170 open-ended questions spanning 72 cognitive bias categories. The dynamic component leverages a rule-based, multi-agent communication framework to facilitate the generation of multi-round dialogues. In addition, we introduce a multi-agent detection method applicable to a wide range of detection tasks, which integrates Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), competitive debate, and a reinforcement learning-based decision module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T11:23:56Z)
• A Multi-LLM Debiasing Framework [85.17156744155915]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools with the potential to benefit society immensely, yet, they have demonstrated biases that perpetuate societal inequalities. Recent research has shown a growing interest in multi-LLM approaches, which have been demonstrated to be effective in improving the quality of reasoning. We propose a novel multi-LLM debiasing framework aimed at reducing bias in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T20:24:50Z)
• The African Woman is Rhythmic and Soulful: An Investigation of Implicit Biases in LLM Open-ended Text Generation [3.9945212716333063]
  Implicit biases are significant because they influence the decisions made by Large Language Models (LLMs) Traditionally, explicit bias tests or embedding-based methods are employed to detect bias, but these approaches can overlook more nuanced, implicit forms of bias. We introduce two novel psychological-inspired methodologies to reveal and measure implicit biases through prompt-based and decision-making tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T13:21:33Z)
• Towards Probing Speech-Specific Risks in Large Multimodal Models: A Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Insights [50.89022445197919]
  We propose a speech-specific risk taxonomy, covering 8 risk categories under hostility (malicious sarcasm and threats), malicious imitation (age, gender, ethnicity), and stereotypical biases (age, gender, ethnicity) Based on the taxonomy, we create a small-scale dataset for evaluating current LMMs capability in detecting these categories of risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T10:08:45Z)
• OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models [108.2219657433884]
  We tackle the challenge of open-set bias detection in text-to-image generative models presenting OpenBias. OpenBias identifies and quantifies the severity of biases agnostically, without access to any precompiled set. We study the behavior of Stable Diffusion 1.5, 2, and XL emphasizing new biases, never investigated before.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T17:59:56Z)
• Investigating Bias in LLM-Based Bias Detection: Disparities between LLMs and Human Perception [13.592532358127293]
  We investigate the presence and nature of bias within Large Language Models (LLMs) We probe whether LLMs exhibit biases, particularly in political bias prediction and text continuation tasks. We propose debiasing strategies, including prompt engineering and model fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T00:59:48Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• Bias-Conflict Sample Synthesis and Adversarial Removal Debias Strategy for Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video [67.24316233946381]
  Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video (TSGV) is troubled by dataset bias issue. We propose the bias-conflict sample synthesis and adversarial removal debias strategy (BSSARD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T09:59:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.