Self-reflecting Large Language Models: A Hegelian Dialectical Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14917v3
• Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:12:05 GMT
• Title: Self-reflecting Large Language Models: A Hegelian Dialectical Approach
• Authors: Sara Abdali, Can Goksen, Saeed Amizadeh, Kazuhito Koishida,
• Abstract summary: Investigating NLP through a philosophical lens has recently caught researcher's eyes as it connects computational methods with classical schools of philosophy. This paper introduces a philosophical approach inspired by the Hegelian Dialectic for LLMs' self-reflection, utilizing a self-dialectical approach to emulate internal critiques and then synthesize new ideas by resolving the contradicting points. Our experiments show promise in generating new ideas and provide a stepping stone for future research.
• Score: 13.910371970437708
• License:
• Abstract: Investigating NLP through a philosophical lens has recently caught researcher's eyes as it connects computational methods with classical schools of philosophy. This paper introduces a philosophical approach inspired by the Hegelian Dialectic for LLMs' self-reflection, utilizing a self-dialectical approach to emulate internal critiques and then synthesize new ideas by resolving the contradicting points. Moreover, this paper investigates the effect of LLMs' temperature for generation by establishing a dynamic annealing approach, which promotes the creativity in the early stages and gradually refines it by focusing on the nuances, as well as a fixed temperature strategy for generation. Our proposed approach is examined to determine its ability to generate novel ideas from an initial proposition. Additionally, a Multi Agent Majority Voting (MAMV) strategy is leveraged to assess the validity and novelty of the generated ideas, which proves beneficial in the absence of domain experts. Our experiments show promise in generating new ideas and provide a stepping stone for future research.

Related papers

• A Causality-aware Paradigm for Evaluating Creativity of Multimodal Large Language Models [100.16387798660833]
  Oogiri game is a creativity-driven task requiring humor and associative thinking. LoTbench is an interactive, causality-aware evaluation framework. Results show that while most LLMs exhibit constrained creativity, the performance gap between LLMs and humans is not insurmountable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T09:11:15Z)
• Learning to Generate Research Idea with Dynamic Control [21.30777644522451]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating hypotheses and research ideas. We introduce a novel framework that employs a two-stage approach combiningSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and controllable Reinforcement Learning (RL) Our framework provides a balanced approach to research ideation, achieving high-quality outcomes by dynamically navigating the trade-offs among novelty, feasibility, and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T08:28:18Z)
• Nova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated Ideas [30.3756058589173]
  We introduce an enhanced planning and search methodology designed to boost the creative potential of large language models (LLMs) Our framework substantially elevates the quality of generated ideas, particularly in novelty and diversity. Our method outperforms the current state-of-the-art, generating at least 2.5 times more top-rated ideas based on 170 seed papers in a Swiss Tournament evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:04:36Z)
• Good Idea or Not, Representation of LLM Could Tell [86.36317971482755]
  We focus on idea assessment, which aims to leverage the knowledge of large language models to assess the merit of scientific ideas. We release a benchmark dataset from nearly four thousand manuscript papers with full texts, meticulously designed to train and evaluate the performance of different approaches to this task. Our findings suggest that the representations of large language models hold more potential in quantifying the value of ideas than their generative outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T02:07:22Z)
• Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers [90.26363107905344]
  Large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery. No evaluations have shown that LLM systems can take the very first step of producing novel, expert-level ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T08:25:03Z)
• Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation [39.546827184857754]
  In this work, we introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity. We define NEOGAUGE, a metric that quantifies both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative responses. We test the proposed framework on Codeforces problems, which serve as both a natural dataset for coding tasks and a collection of prior human solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T05:55:22Z)
• Think Twice: Perspective-Taking Improves Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind Capabilities [63.90227161974381]
  SimToM is a novel prompting framework inspired by Simulation Theory's notion of perspective-taking. Our approach, which requires no additional training and minimal prompt-tuning, shows substantial improvement over existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T22:49:27Z)
• Operationalising Representation in Natural Language Processing [0.0]
  The project of operationalising a philosophically-informed notion of representation should be of interest to both philosophers of science and NLP practitioners. It affords philosophers a novel testing-ground for claims about the nature of representation, and helps NLPers organise the large literature on probing experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T01:34:16Z)
• Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate [85.3444184685235]
  We propose a Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework, in which multiple agents express their arguments in the state of "tit for tat" and a judge manages the debate process to obtain a final solution. Our framework encourages divergent thinking in LLMs which would be helpful for tasks that require deep levels of contemplation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T15:25:45Z)
• SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Novelty [68.46036589035539]
  We explore and enhance the ability of neural language models to generate novel scientific directions grounded in literature. We take a dramatic departure with a novel setting in which models use as input background contexts. We present SciMON, a modeling framework that uses retrieval of "inspirations" from past scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.