Unraveling Token Prediction Refinement and Identifying Essential Layers in Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15054v2
• Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 18:34:17 GMT
• Title: Unraveling Token Prediction Refinement and Identifying Essential Layers in Language Models
• Authors: Jaturong Kongmanee,
• Abstract summary: This research aims to unravel how large language models (LLMs) iteratively refine token predictions through internal processing.<n>We focused on how LLMs access and utilize information from input contexts, and how positioning of relevant information affects the model's token prediction refinement process.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This research aims to unravel how large language models (LLMs) iteratively refine token predictions through internal processing. We utilized a logit lens technique to analyze the model's token predictions derived from intermediate representations. Specifically, we focused on (1) how LLMs access and utilize information from input contexts, and (2) how positioning of relevant information affects the model's token prediction refinement process. On a multi-document question answering task with varying input context lengths, we found that the depth of prediction refinement (defined as the number of intermediate layers an LLM uses to transition from an initial correct token prediction to its final, stable correct output), as a function of the position of relevant information, exhibits an approximately inverted U-shaped curve. We also found that the gap between these two layers, on average, diminishes when relevant information is positioned at the beginning or end of the input context. This suggested that the model requires more refinements when processing longer contexts with relevant information situated in the middle. Furthermore, our findings indicate that not all layers are equally essential for determining final correct outputs. Our analysis provides insights into how token predictions are distributed across different conditions, and establishes important connections to existing hypotheses and previous findings in AI safety research and development.

Related papers

• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks.<n>We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• Model-diff: A Tool for Comparative Study of Language Models in the Input Space [34.680890752084004]
  We propose a new model comparative analysis setting that considers a large input space where brute-force enumeration would be infeasible.<n>Experiments reveal for the first time the quantitative prediction differences between LMs in a large input space, potentially facilitating the model analysis for applications such as model plagiarism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T00:06:25Z)
• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a time series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• Aggregation Artifacts in Subjective Tasks Collapse Large Language Models' Posteriors [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has become the primary method for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we examine whether this is the result of the aggregation used in corresponding datasets, where trying to combine low-agreement, disparate annotations might lead to annotation artifacts that create detrimental noise in the prompt.<n>Our results indicate that aggregation is a confounding factor in the modeling of subjective tasks, and advocate focusing on modeling individuals instead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:16:00Z)
• How Language Models Prioritize Contextual Grammatical Cues? [3.9790222241649587]
  We investigate how language models handle gender agreement when multiple gender cue words are present. Our findings reveal striking differences in how encoder-based and decoder-based models prioritize and use contextual information for their predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T14:09:05Z)
• Downstream-Pretext Domain Knowledge Traceback for Active Learning [138.02530777915362]
  We propose a downstream-pretext domain knowledge traceback (DOKT) method that traces the data interactions of downstream knowledge and pre-training guidance. DOKT consists of a traceback diversity indicator and a domain-based uncertainty estimator. Experiments conducted on ten datasets show that our model outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T01:34:13Z)
• Dwell in the Beginning: How Language Models Embed Long Documents for Dense Retrieval [31.9252824152673]
  We build on previous research that demonstrated loss of information in the middle of input sequences for causal language models. We examine positional biases at various stages of training for an encoder-decoder model, including language model pre-training, contrastive pre-training, and contrastive fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T15:16:16Z)
• You Only Forward Once: Prediction and Rationalization in A Single Forward Pass [10.998983921416533]
  Unsupervised rationale extraction aims to extract concise and contiguous text snippets to support model predictions without any rationale. Previous studies have used a two-phase framework known as the Rationalizing Neural Prediction (RNP) framework, which follows a generate-then-predict paradigm. We propose a novel single-phase framework called You Only Forward Once (YOFO), derived from a relaxed version of rationale where rationales aim to support model predictions rather than make predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T08:04:28Z)
• A Mechanistic Interpretation of Arithmetic Reasoning in Language Models using Causal Mediation Analysis [128.0532113800092]
  We present a mechanistic interpretation of Transformer-based LMs on arithmetic questions. This provides insights into how information related to arithmetic is processed by LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T11:43:47Z)
• Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models [41.71388509750695]
  Transformer-based language models (LMs) are known to capture factual knowledge in their parameters. We study how the model aggregates information about the subject and relation to predict the correct attribute. Our findings introduce a comprehensive view of how factual associations are stored and extracted internally in LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T11:26:17Z)
• A Closer Look at Few-shot Classification Again [68.44963578735877]
  Few-shot classification consists of a training phase and an adaptation phase. We empirically prove that the training algorithm and the adaptation algorithm can be completely disentangled. Our meta-analysis for each phase reveals several interesting insights that may help better understand key aspects of few-shot classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T16:42:05Z)
• Interpretable by Design: Learning Predictors by Composing Interpretable Queries [8.054701719767293]
  We argue that machine learning algorithms should be interpretable by design. We minimize the expected number of queries needed for accurate prediction. Experiments on vision and NLP tasks demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-03T02:40:34Z)
• A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
  We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification. The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample. A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z)
• A Generative Language Model for Few-shot Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis [90.24921443175514]
  We focus on aspect-based sentiment analysis, which involves extracting aspect term, category, and predicting their corresponding polarities. We propose to reformulate the extraction and prediction tasks into the sequence generation task, using a generative language model with unidirectional attention. Our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (based on BERT) on average performance by a large margins in few-shot and full-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T18:31:53Z)
• Sorting through the noise: Testing robustness of information processing in pre-trained language models [5.371816551086117]
  This paper examines robustness of models' ability to deploy relevant context information in the face of distracting content. We find that although models appear in simple contexts to make predictions based on understanding and applying relevant facts from prior context, the presence of distracting but irrelevant content has clear impact in confusing model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T16:02:23Z)
• On the Transferability of Pre-trained Language Models: A Study from Artificial Datasets [74.11825654535895]
  Pre-training language models (LMs) on large-scale unlabeled text data makes the model much easier to achieve exceptional downstream performance. We study what specific traits in the pre-training data, other than the semantics, make a pre-trained LM superior to their counterparts trained from scratch on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T10:39:57Z)
• Understanding Neural Abstractive Summarization Models via Uncertainty [54.37665950633147]
  seq2seq abstractive summarization models generate text in a free-form manner. We study the entropy, or uncertainty, of the model's token-level predictions. We show that uncertainty is a useful perspective for analyzing summarization and text generation models more broadly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:57:27Z)
• Value-driven Hindsight Modelling [68.658900923595]
  Value estimation is a critical component of the reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm. Model learning can make use of the rich transition structure present in sequences of observations, but this approach is usually not sensitive to the reward function. We develop an approach for representation learning in RL that sits in between these two extremes. This provides tractable prediction targets that are directly relevant for a task, and can thus accelerate learning the value function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-19T18:10:20Z)
• Conditional Mutual information-based Contrastive Loss for Financial Time Series Forecasting [12.0855096102517]
  We present a representation learning framework for financial time series forecasting. In this paper, we propose to first learn compact representations from time series data, then use the learned representations to train a simpler model for predicting time series movements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T15:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.