B-RIGHT: Benchmark Re-evaluation for Integrity in Generalized Human-Object Interaction Testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16724v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 06:04:08 GMT
• Title: B-RIGHT: Benchmark Re-evaluation for Integrity in Generalized Human-Object Interaction Testing
• Authors: Yoojin Jang, Junsu Kim, Hayeon Kim, Eun-ki Lee, Eun-sol Kim, Seungryul Baek, Jaejun Yoo,
• Abstract summary: Human-object interaction (HOI) is an essential problem in artificial intelligence (AI) Current benchmarks such as HICO-DET face the following limitations. We propose a new class-balanced dataset, Benchmark Re-evaluation for Integrity in Generalized Human-object Interaction Testing (B-RIGHT)
• Score: 18.822653709976784
• License:
• Abstract: Human-object interaction (HOI) is an essential problem in artificial intelligence (AI) which aims to understand the visual world that involves complex relationships between humans and objects. However, current benchmarks such as HICO-DET face the following limitations: (1) severe class imbalance and (2) varying number of train and test sets for certain classes. These issues can potentially lead to either inflation or deflation of model performance during evaluation, ultimately undermining the reliability of evaluation scores. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach to develop a new class-balanced dataset, Benchmark Re-evaluation for Integrity in Generalized Human-object Interaction Testing (B-RIGHT), that addresses these imbalanced problems. B-RIGHT achieves class balance by leveraging balancing algorithm and automated generation-and-filtering processes, ensuring an equal number of instances for each HOI class. Furthermore, we design a balanced zero-shot test set to systematically evaluate models on unseen scenario. Re-evaluating existing models using B-RIGHT reveals substantial the reduction of score variance and changes in performance rankings compared to conventional HICO-DET. Our experiments demonstrate that evaluation under balanced conditions ensure more reliable and fair model comparisons.

Related papers

• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• From Static Benchmarks to Adaptive Testing: Psychometrics in AI Evaluation [60.14902811624433]
  We discuss a paradigm shift from static evaluation methods to adaptive testing. This involves estimating the characteristics and value of each test item in the benchmark and dynamically adjusting items in real-time. We analyze the current approaches, advantages, and underlying reasons for adopting psychometrics in AI evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
  We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models. We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench. GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z)
• TISE: A Toolbox for Text-to-Image Synthesis Evaluation [9.092600296992925]
  We conduct a study on state-of-the-art methods for single- and multi-object text-to-image synthesis. We propose a common framework for evaluating these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T16:39:35Z)
• Rethinking Self-Supervision Objectives for Generalizable Coherence Modeling [8.329870357145927]
  Coherence evaluation of machine generated text is one of the principal applications of coherence models that needs to be investigated. We explore training data and self-supervision objectives that result in a model that generalizes well across tasks. We show empirically that increasing the density of negative samples improves the basic model, and using a global negative queue further improves and stabilizes the model while training with hard negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T07:44:14Z)
• Towards Automatic Evaluation of Dialog Systems: A Model-Free Off-Policy Evaluation Approach [84.02388020258141]
  We propose a new framework named ENIGMA for estimating human evaluation scores based on off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. ENIGMA only requires a handful of pre-collected experience data, and therefore does not involve human interaction with the target policy during the evaluation. Our experiments show that ENIGMA significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluation scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T03:29:20Z)
• Robustness Gym: Unifying the NLP Evaluation Landscape [91.80175115162218]
  Deep neural networks are often brittle when deployed in real-world systems. Recent research has focused on testing the robustness of such models. We propose a solution in the form of Robustness Gym, a simple and evaluation toolkit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T02:37:54Z)
• Long-Tailed Recognition Using Class-Balanced Experts [128.73438243408393]
  We propose an ensemble of class-balanced experts that combines the strength of diverse classifiers. Our ensemble of class-balanced experts reaches results close to state-of-the-art and an extended ensemble establishes a new state-of-the-art on two benchmarks for long-tailed recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T20:57:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.