O-MAPL: Offline Multi-agent Preference Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18944v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 08:08:20 GMT
• Title: O-MAPL: Offline Multi-agent Preference Learning
• Authors: The Viet Bui, Tien Mai, Hong Thanh Nguyen,
• Abstract summary: Inferring reward functions from demonstrations is a key challenge in reinforcement learning (RL) We introduce a novel end-to-end preference-based learning framework for cooperative MARL. Our algorithm outperforms existing methods across various tasks.
• Score: 5.4482836906033585
• License:
• Abstract: Inferring reward functions from demonstrations is a key challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), particularly in multi-agent RL (MARL), where large joint state-action spaces and complex inter-agent interactions complicate the task. While prior single-agent studies have explored recovering reward functions and policies from human preferences, similar work in MARL is limited. Existing methods often involve separate stages of supervised reward learning and MARL algorithms, leading to unstable training. In this work, we introduce a novel end-to-end preference-based learning framework for cooperative MARL, leveraging the underlying connection between reward functions and soft Q-functions. Our approach uses a carefully-designed multi-agent value decomposition strategy to improve training efficiency. Extensive experiments on SMAC and MAMuJoCo benchmarks show that our algorithm outperforms existing methods across various tasks.

Related papers

• MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Training [64.13803241218886]
  We present a first step toward "Multi-agent LLM training" (MALT) on reasoning problems. Our approach employs a sequential multi-agent setup with heterogeneous LLMs assigned specialized roles. We evaluate our approach across MATH, GSM8k, and CQA, where MALT on Llama 3.1 8B models achieves relative improvements of 14.14%, 7.12%, and 9.40% respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T19:30:36Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with a Hierarchy of Reward Machines [5.600971575680638]
  We study the cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) problems using Reward Machines (RMs) We present Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with a hierarchy of RMs (MAHRM) that is capable of dealing with more complex scenarios. Experimental results in three cooperative MARL domains show that MAHRM outperforms other MARL methods using the same prior knowledge of high-level events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T06:38:22Z)
• Joint Intrinsic Motivation for Coordinated Exploration in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose an approach for rewarding strategies where agents collectively exhibit novel behaviors. Jim rewards joint trajectories based on a centralized measure of novelty designed to function in continuous environments. Results show that joint exploration is crucial for solving tasks where the optimal strategy requires a high level of coordination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T13:02:00Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• MALib: A Parallel Framework for Population-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [61.28547338576706]
  Population-based multi-agent reinforcement learning (PB-MARL) refers to the series of methods nested with reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. We present MALib, a scalable and efficient computing framework for PB-MARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T03:27:08Z)
• Softmax with Regularization: Better Value Estimation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [72.28520951105207]
  Overestimation in $Q$-learning is an important problem that has been extensively studied in single-agent reinforcement learning. We propose a novel regularization-based update scheme that penalizes large joint action-values deviating from a baseline. We show that our method provides a consistent performance improvement on a set of challenging StarCraft II micromanagement tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T14:18:39Z)
• Modeling the Interaction between Agents in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [2.9360071145551068]
  We propose a novel cooperative MARL algorithm named as interactive actor-critic(IAC) IAC models the interaction of agents from perspectives of policy and value function. We extend the value decomposition methods to continuous control tasks and evaluate IAC on benchmark tasks including classic control and multi-agent particle environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T01:58:28Z)
• UneVEn: Universal Value Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.73686229912562]
  We propose a novel MARL approach called Universal Value Exploration (UneVEn) UneVEn learns a set of related tasks simultaneously with a linear decomposition of universal successor features. Empirical results on a set of exploration games, challenging cooperative predator-prey tasks requiring significant coordination among agents, and StarCraft II micromanagement benchmarks show that UneVEn can solve tasks where other state-of-the-art MARL methods fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T19:08:47Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks [11.480994804659908]
  Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria. We provide a systematic evaluation and comparison of three different classes of MARL algorithms. Our experiments serve as a reference for the expected performance of algorithms across different learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T11:22:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.