From Uncertain to Safe: Conformal Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models for Safe PDE Control
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02205v3
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:16:50 GMT
- Title: From Uncertain to Safe: Conformal Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models for Safe PDE Control
- Abstract summary: Deep learning for partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained control is gaining increasing attention.<n>We propose Safe Diffusion Models for PDE Control (SafeDiffCon) to achieve optimal control under safety constraints.<n>We evaluate SafeDiffCon on three control tasks: 1D Burgers' equation, 2D incompressible fluid, and controlled nuclear fusion problem.
- Score: 16.249515106834355
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The application of deep learning for partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained control is gaining increasing attention. However, existing methods rarely consider safety requirements crucial in real-world applications. To address this limitation, we propose Safe Diffusion Models for PDE Control (SafeDiffCon), which introduce the uncertainty quantile as model uncertainty quantification to achieve optimal control under safety constraints through both post-training and inference phases. Firstly, our approach post-trains a pre-trained diffusion model to generate control sequences that better satisfy safety constraints while achieving improved control objectives via a reweighted diffusion loss, which incorporates the uncertainty quantile estimated using conformal prediction. Secondly, during inference, the diffusion model dynamically adjusts both its generation process and parameters through iterative guidance and fine-tuning, conditioned on control targets while simultaneously integrating the estimated uncertainty quantile. We evaluate SafeDiffCon on three control tasks: 1D Burgers' equation, 2D incompressible fluid, and controlled nuclear fusion problem. Results demonstrate that SafeDiffCon is the only method that satisfies all safety constraints, whereas other classical and deep learning baselines fail. Furthermore, while adhering to safety constraints, SafeDiffCon achieves the best control performance. The code can be found at https://github.com/AI4Science-WestlakeU/safediffcon.
Related papers
- Safe Vision Language Action Models via Barrier Enhanced Flow Matching [0.0]
This article presents a modular inference framework that integrates Flow Matching generative models with formal Control Barrier Function safety guarantees.<n>By employing a smooth Log-Sum-Exponential aggregate barrier, we enforce safety over entire action chunks.<n>We validate the approach on two robotic manipulation platforms and a 2D navigation benchmark, verifying that our framework achieves reliable safety without degrading the success rate of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-31T15:56:19Z) - Robust Operational Space Control with Conformal Disturbance Bounds for Safe Redundant Manipulation [4.337275843491041]
Redundant robotic manipulators operating in constrained and human-interactive environments require accurate task-space tracking.<n>This paper proposes a robust OSCTC framework that integrates an extended state observer (ESO) with conformal prediction.<n>Experiments on a 7-DoF Franka Research 3 manipulator demonstrate millimeter-level tracking accuracy and real-time safe control at 1kHz under various disturbances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T04:33:39Z) - Selective Safety Steering via Value-Filtered Decoding [54.87935112120107]
Large language models (LLMs) are trained to align with human values, but their generations may still violate safety constraints.<n>Existing decoding-time steering methods often intervene unnecessarily, modifying generations that would have been safe under the base model.<n>We propose a new test-time steering method designed to reduce such unnecessary interventions while improving the safety of unsafe responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T12:13:08Z) - Differentiable Optimization Layered Safety-Critical Control for Risk-Aware Navigation via Conformal Prediction [16.10361545309497]
This paper presents a differentiable optimization layered safety-critical control method based on conformal prediction.<n>To handle uncertainties arising from sensor noise, the conformal prediction method is employed to generate risk-aware obstacle ellipsoids around an elliptical-shaped robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T11:26:07Z) - Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function With Application to Vehicles [0.0]
This paper proposes a unified control framework based on Response-Aware Risk-Constrained Control Barrier Function for dynamic safety boundary control of vehicles.<n>The framework fuses nominal dynamics priors with direct vehicle body responses to provide a baseline direction for control gradients.<n>It also reformulates traditional deterministic safety constraints into probabilistic constraints on the tail risk of barrier function derivatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T02:38:17Z) - BarrierSteer: LLM Safety via Learning Barrier Steering [83.12893815611052]
BarrierSteer is a novel framework that formalizes safety by embedding learned non-linear safety constraints directly into the model's latent representation space.<n>We show that BarrierSteer substantially reduces adversarial success rates, decreases unsafe generations, and outperforms existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T18:19:46Z) - Boundary-to-Region Supervision for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning [56.150983204962735]
Boundary-to-Region (B2R) is a framework that enables asymmetric conditioning through cost signal realignment.<n>B2R redefines CTG as a boundary constraint under a fixed safety budget, unifying the cost distribution of all feasible trajectories.<n> Experimental results show that B2R satisfies safety constraints in 35 out of 38 safety-critical tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T03:38:20Z) - Risk-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Control of Stochastic Linear Systems [7.952582509792973]
This paper presents a risk-aware safe reinforcement learning control design for discrete-time linear systems.<n>A risk-informed safe controller is also learned besides the RL controller, and the RL and safe controllers are combined together.<n>It is shown that this control-oriented approach reduces data requirements and can also reduce the variance of safety violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-14T18:49:32Z) - Advancing Neural Network Verification through Hierarchical Safety Abstract Interpretation [52.626086874715284]
We introduce a novel problem formulation called Abstract DNN-Verification, which verifies a hierarchical structure of unsafe outputs.<n>By leveraging abstract interpretation and reasoning about output reachable sets, our approach enables assessing multiple safety levels during the formal verification process.<n>Our contributions include a theoretical exploration of the relationship between our novel abstract safety formulation and existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T13:29:46Z) - Sampling-based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Nonlinear Dynamical
Systems [15.863561935347692]
We develop provably safe and convergent reinforcement learning algorithms for control of nonlinear dynamical systems.
Recent advances at the intersection of control and RL follow a two-stage, safety filter approach to enforcing hard safety constraints.
We develop a single-stage, sampling-based approach to hard constraint satisfaction that learns RL controllers enjoying classical convergence guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T19:39:20Z) - Multi-Step Model Predictive Safety Filters: Reducing Chattering by
Increasing the Prediction Horizon [7.55113002732746]
Safety, the satisfaction of state and input constraints, can be guaranteed by augmenting the learned control policy with a safety filter.
Model predictive safety filters (MPSFs) are a common safety filtering approach based on model predictive control (MPC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T16:35:29Z) - Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Control Barrier Function using
Conditional Value-at-Risk with Differentiable Convex Programming [4.825619788907192]
Control Barrier functions (CBFs) have attracted extensive attention for designing safe controllers for real-world safety-critical systems.
We present distributional robust CBF to achieve resilience under distributional shift.
We also provide an approximate variant of DR-CBF for higher-order systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T18:45:09Z) - SafeDiffuser: Safe Planning with Diffusion Probabilistic Models [97.80042457099718]
Diffusion model-based approaches have shown promise in data-driven planning, but there are no safety guarantees.
We propose a new method, called SafeDiffuser, to ensure diffusion probabilistic models satisfy specifications.
We test our method on a series of safe planning tasks, including maze path generation, legged robot locomotion, and 3D space manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T19:38:12Z) - Probabilities Are Not Enough: Formal Controller Synthesis for Stochastic
Dynamical Models with Epistemic Uncertainty [68.00748155945047]
Capturing uncertainty in models of complex dynamical systems is crucial to designing safe controllers.
Several approaches use formal abstractions to synthesize policies that satisfy temporal specifications related to safety and reachability.
Our contribution is a novel abstraction-based controller method for continuous-state models with noise, uncertain parameters, and external disturbances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T07:57:03Z) - Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement
Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments [84.3830478851369]
We propose a safe reinforcement learning approach that can jointly learn the environment and optimize the control policy.
Our approach can effectively enforce hard safety constraints and significantly outperform CMDP-based baseline methods in system safe rate measured via simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T20:49:25Z) - Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers.
We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller.
We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z) - Pointwise Feasibility of Gaussian Process-based Safety-Critical Control
under Model Uncertainty [77.18483084440182]
Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and Control Lyapunov Functions (CLFs) are popular tools for enforcing safety and stability of a controlled system, respectively.
We present a Gaussian Process (GP)-based approach to tackle the problem of model uncertainty in safety-critical controllers that use CBFs and CLFs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-13T23:08:49Z) - Safe Learning of Uncertain Environments for Nonlinear Control-Affine
Systems [10.918870296899245]
We consider the problem of safe learning in nonlinear control-affine systems subject to unknown additive uncertainty.
We model uncertainty as a Gaussian signal and use state measurements to learn its mean and covariance bounds.
We show that with an arbitrarily large probability we can guarantee that the state will remain in the safe set, while learning and control are carried out simultaneously.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T01:58:02Z) - Reinforcement Learning for Safety-Critical Control under Model
Uncertainty, using Control Lyapunov Functions and Control Barrier Functions [96.63967125746747]
Reinforcement learning framework learns the model uncertainty present in the CBF and CLF constraints.
RL-CBF-CLF-QP addresses the problem of model uncertainty in the safety constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-16T10:51:33Z) - Safe Wasserstein Constrained Deep Q-Learning [2.088376060651494]
This paper presents a distributionally robust Q-Learning algorithm (DrQ) which leverages Wasserstein ambiguity sets to provide idealistic probabilistic out-of-sample safety guarantees.
Using a case study of lithium-ion battery fast charging, we explore how idealistic safety guarantees translate to generally improved safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-07T21:23:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.