Optimistic Algorithms for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04673v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 05:39:32 GMT
• Title: Optimistic Algorithms for Adaptive Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect
• Authors: Ojash Neopane, Aaditya Ramdas, Aarti Singh,
• Abstract summary: Recent advances in martingale theory have paved the way for adaptive methods that can enhance the power of downstream inference. We study adaptive sampling procedures that take advantage of optimalally optimal causal inference procedures. Our findings mark a step forward in advancing adaptive causal inference methods in theory and practice.
• Score: 36.25361703897723
• License:
• Abstract: Estimation and inference for the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) is a cornerstone of causal inference and often serves as the foundation for developing procedures for more complicated settings. Although traditionally analyzed in a batch setting, recent advances in martingale theory have paved the way for adaptive methods that can enhance the power of downstream inference. Despite these advances, progress in understanding and developing adaptive algorithms remains in its early stages. Existing work either focus on asymptotic analyses that overlook exploration-exploitation tradeoffs relevant in finite-sample regimes or rely on simpler but suboptimal estimators. In this work, we address these limitations by studying adaptive sampling procedures that take advantage of the asymptotically optimal Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) estimator. Our analysis uncovers challenges obscured by asymptotic approaches and introduces a novel algorithmic design principle reminiscent of optimism in multiarmed bandits. This principled approach enables our algorithm to achieve significant theoretical and empirical gains compared to prior methods. Our findings mark a step forward in advancing adaptive causal inference methods in theory and practice.

Related papers

• Achieving $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ Regret in Average-Reward POMDPs with Known Observation Models [56.92178753201331]
  We tackle average-reward infinite-horizon POMDPs with an unknown transition model. We present a novel and simple estimator that overcomes this barrier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T22:29:41Z)
• Adaptive Experimentation at Scale: A Computational Framework for Flexible Batches [7.390918770007728]
  Motivated by practical instances involving a handful of reallocations in which outcomes are measured in batches, we develop an adaptive-driven experimentation framework. Our main observation is that normal approximations, which are universal in statistical inference, can also guide the design of adaptive algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T04:17:03Z)
• Learning to Optimize with Stochastic Dominance Constraints [103.26714928625582]
  In this paper, we develop a simple yet efficient approach for the problem of comparing uncertain quantities. We recast inner optimization in the Lagrangian as a learning problem for surrogate approximation, which bypasses apparent intractability. The proposed light-SD demonstrates superior performance on several representative problems ranging from finance to supply chain management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T21:54:31Z)
• Instance-Dependent Confidence and Early Stopping for Reinforcement Learning [99.57168572237421]
  Various algorithms for reinforcement learning (RL) exhibit dramatic variation in their convergence rates as a function of problem structure. This research provides guarantees that explain textitex post the performance differences observed. A natural next step is to convert these theoretical guarantees into guidelines that are useful in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T04:25:35Z)
• Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization [53.12363770169761]
  We study a class of algorithms for solving bilevel optimization problems in both deterministic and deterministic settings. We exploit a warm-start strategy to amortize the estimation of the exact gradient. By using this framework, our analysis shows these algorithms to match the computational complexity of methods that have access to an unbiased estimate of the gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T15:10:09Z)
• A theoretical and empirical study of new adaptive algorithms with additional momentum steps and shifted updates for stochastic non-convex optimization [0.0]
  It is thought that adaptive optimization algorithms represent the key pillar behind the of the Learning field. In this paper we introduce adaptive momentum techniques for different non-smooth objective problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T09:47:57Z)
• Outlier-Robust Sparse Estimation via Non-Convex Optimization [73.18654719887205]
  We explore the connection between high-dimensional statistics and non-robust optimization in the presence of sparsity constraints. We develop novel and simple optimization formulations for these problems. As a corollary, we obtain that any first-order method that efficiently converges to station yields an efficient algorithm for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T17:38:24Z)
• Meta-Regularization: An Approach to Adaptive Choice of the Learning Rate in Gradient Descent [20.47598828422897]
  We propose textit-Meta-Regularization, a novel approach for the adaptive choice of the learning rate in first-order descent methods. Our approach modifies the objective function by adding a regularization term, and casts the joint process parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T13:13:34Z)
• Beyond variance reduction: Understanding the true impact of baselines on policy optimization [24.09670734037029]
  We show that learning dynamics are governed by the curvature of the loss function and the noise of the gradient estimates. We present theoretical results showing that, at least for bandit problems, curvature and noise are not sufficient to explain the learning dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T17:52:09Z)
• A Dynamical Systems Approach for Convergence of the Bayesian EM Algorithm [59.99439951055238]
  We show how (discrete-time) Lyapunov stability theory can serve as a powerful tool to aid, or even lead, in the analysis (and potential design) of optimization algorithms that are not necessarily gradient-based. The particular ML problem that this paper focuses on is that of parameter estimation in an incomplete-data Bayesian framework via the popular optimization algorithm known as maximum a posteriori expectation-maximization (MAP-EM) We show that fast convergence (linear or quadratic) is achieved, which could have been difficult to unveil without our adopted S&C approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T01:34:18Z)
• Boosting Algorithms for Estimating Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules [4.898659895355356]
  We present nonparametric algorithms for estimating optimal individualized treatment rules. The proposed algorithms are based on the XGBoost algorithm, which is known as one of the most powerful algorithms in the machine learning literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T22:26:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.