Context information can be more important than reasoning for time series forecasting with a large language model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.05699v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:39:07 GMT
• Title: Context information can be more important than reasoning for time series forecasting with a large language model
• Authors: Janghoon Yang,
• Abstract summary: We explore the characteristics of large language models (LLMs) for time series forecasting.<n>Findings indicate that no single prompting method is universally applicable.<n>LLMs often fail to follow the procedures described by the prompt.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the evolution of large language models (LLMs), there is growing interest in leveraging LLMs for time series tasks. In this paper, we explore the characteristics of LLMs for time series forecasting by considering various existing and proposed prompting techniques. Forecasting for both short and long time series was evaluated. Our findings indicate that no single prompting method is universally applicable. It was also observed that simply providing proper context information related to the time series, without additional reasoning prompts, can achieve performance comparable to the best-performing prompt for each case. From this observation, it is expected that providing proper context information can be more crucial than a prompt for specific reasoning in time series forecasting. Several weaknesses in prompting for time series forecasting were also identified. First, LLMs often fail to follow the procedures described by the prompt. Second, when reasoning steps involve simple algebraic calculations with several operands, LLMs often fail to calculate accurately. Third, LLMs sometimes misunderstand the semantics of prompts, resulting in incomplete responses.

Related papers

• LLM-PS: Empowering Large Language Models for Time Series Forecasting with Temporal Patterns and Semantics [56.99021951927683]
  Time Series Forecasting (TSF) is critical in many real-world domains like financial planning and health monitoring. Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) usually perform suboptimally because they neglect the inherent characteristics of time series data. We propose LLM-PS to empower the LLM for TSF by learning the fundamental textitPatterns and meaningful textitSemantics from time series data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T11:45:11Z)
• Explainable Multi-modal Time Series Prediction with LLM-in-the-Loop [63.34626300024294]
  TimeXL is a multi-modal prediction framework that integrates a prototype-based time series encoder. It produces more accurate predictions and interpretable explanations. Empirical evaluations on four real-world datasets demonstrate that TimeXL achieves up to 8.9% improvement in AUC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T20:40:53Z)
• Position: Empowering Time Series Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs [49.73647759532127]
  We argue that multimodal language models (MLLMs) can enable more powerful and flexible reasoning for time series analysis. We call on researchers and practitioners to leverage this potential by developing strategies that prioritize trust, interpretability, and robust reasoning in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:10:48Z)
• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context.<n>We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters.<n>We propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• Can LLMs Understand Time Series Anomalies? [20.848375315326305]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained popularity in time series forecasting, but their potential for anomaly detection remains largely unexplored. This study investigates whether LLMs can understand and detect anomalies in time series data, focusing on zero-shot and few-shot scenarios. Our results suggest that while LLMs can understand trivial time series anomalies, we have no evidence that they can understand more subtle real-world anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:16:02Z)
• Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting? [21.378728572776897]
  We find that removing the LLM component or replacing it with a basic attention layer does not degrade forecasting performance. We also find that despite their significant computational cost, pretrained LLMs do no better than models trained from scratch. We explore time series encoders and find that patching and attention structures perform similarly to LLM-based forecasters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T03:33:38Z)
• CALF: Aligning LLMs for Time Series Forecasting via Cross-modal Fine-Tuning [59.88924847995279]
  We propose a novel Cross-Modal LLM Fine-Tuning (CALF) framework for MTSF. To reduce the distribution discrepancy, we develop the cross-modal match module. CALF establishes state-of-the-art performance for both long-term and short-term forecasting tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T04:04:38Z)
• Time Series Forecasting with LLMs: Understanding and Enhancing Model Capabilities [46.02234423159257]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been applied in many fields and have developed rapidly in recent years.<n>Recent works treat large language models as emphzero-shot time series reasoners without further fine-tuning.<n>Our study shows that LLMs perform well in predicting time series with clear patterns and trends, but face challenges with datasets lacking periodicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T17:15:28Z)
• Empowering Time Series Analysis with Large Language Models: A Survey [24.202539098675953]
  We provide a systematic overview of methods that leverage large language models for time series analysis. Specifically, we first state the challenges and motivations of applying language models in the context of time series. Next, we categorize existing methods into different groups (i.e., direct query, tokenization, prompt design, fine-tune, and model integration) and highlight the key ideas within each group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T16:46:35Z)
• AutoTimes: Autoregressive Time Series Forecasters via Large Language Models [67.83502953961505]
  AutoTimes projects time series into the embedding space of language tokens and autoregressively generates future predictions with arbitrary lengths. We formulate time series as prompts, extending the context for prediction beyond the lookback window. AutoTimes achieves state-of-the-art with 0.1% trainable parameters and over $5times$ training/inference speedup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T06:59:21Z)
• MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [17.322480769274062]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper constructs Multiple Sensitive Factors Time QA (MenatQA) with total 2,853 samples for evaluating the time comprehension and reasoning abilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T13:19:52Z)
• Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models [110.20279343734548]
  Time series forecasting holds significant importance in many real-world dynamic systems. We present Time-LLM, a reprogramming framework to repurpose large language models for time series forecasting. Time-LLM is a powerful time series learner that outperforms state-of-the-art, specialized forecasting models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T01:31:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.