Content-Driven Local Response: Supporting Sentence-Level and Message-Level Mobile Email Replies With and Without AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06430v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:06:25 GMT
• Title: Content-Driven Local Response: Supporting Sentence-Level and Message-Level Mobile Email Replies With and Without AI
• Authors: Tim Zindulka, Sven Goller, Florian Lehmann, Daniel Buschek,
• Abstract summary: We develop a new UI concept called Content-Driven Local Response (CDLR), inspired by microtasking. This allows users to insert responses into the email by selecting sentences, which additionally serves to guide AI suggestions.
• Score: 29.130766472908793
• License:
• Abstract: Mobile emailing demands efficiency in diverse situations, which motivates the use of AI. However, generated text does not always reflect how people want to respond. This challenges users with AI involvement tradeoffs not yet considered in email UIs. We address this with a new UI concept called Content-Driven Local Response (CDLR), inspired by microtasking. This allows users to insert responses into the email by selecting sentences, which additionally serves to guide AI suggestions. The concept supports combining AI for local suggestions and message-level improvements. Our user study (N=126) compared CDLR with manual typing and full reply generation. We found that CDLR supports flexible workflows with varying degrees of AI involvement, while retaining the benefits of reduced typing and errors. This work contributes a new approach to integrating AI capabilities: By redesigning the UI for workflows with and without AI, we can empower users to dynamically adjust AI involvement.

Related papers

• Memento No More: Coaching AI Agents to Master Multiple Tasks via Hints Internalization [56.674356045200696]
  We propose a novel method to train AI agents to incorporate knowledge and skills for multiple tasks without the need for cumbersome note systems or prior high-quality demonstration data. Our approach employs an iterative process where the agent collects new experiences, receives corrective feedback from humans in the form of hints, and integrates this feedback into its weights. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by implementing it in a Llama-3-based agent which, after only a few rounds of feedback, outperforms advanced models GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 in a taskset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T17:45:46Z)
• From Voice to Value: Leveraging AI to Enhance Spoken Online Reviews on the Go [21.811104609265158]
  We developed Vocalizer, a mobile application that enables users to provide reviews through voice input. Our findings show that users frequently utilized the AI agent to add more detailed information to their reviews. We also show how interactive AI features can improve users self-efficacy and willingness to share reviews online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T21:59:47Z)
• Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
  We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike. We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z)
• Enhancing AI Assisted Writing with One-Shot Implicit Negative Feedback [6.175028561101999]
  Nifty is an approach that uses classifier guidance to controllably integrate implicit user feedback into the text generation process. We find up to 34% improvement in Rouge-L, 89% improvement in generating the correct intent, and an 86% win-rate according to human evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T18:50:28Z)
• The Future of AI-Assisted Writing [0.0]
  We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push. Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing. Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T02:46:45Z)
• HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face [85.25054021362232]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited exceptional abilities in language understanding, generation, interaction, and reasoning. LLMs could act as a controller to manage existing AI models to solve complicated AI tasks. We present HuggingGPT, an LLM-powered agent that connects various AI models in machine learning communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:48:28Z)
• Collaboration with Conversational AI Assistants for UX Evaluation: Questions and How to Ask them (Voice vs. Text) [18.884080068561843]
  We conducted a Wizard-of-Oz design probe study with 20 participants who interacted with simulated AI assistants via text or voice. We found that participants asked for five categories of information: user actions, user mental model, help from the AI assistant, product and task information, and user demographics. The text assistant was perceived as significantly more efficient, but both were rated equally in satisfaction and trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T03:59:14Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Suggestion Lists vs. Continuous Generation: Interaction Design for Writing with Generative Models on Mobile Devices Affect Text Length, Wording and Perceived Authorship [27.853155569154705]
  We present two user interfaces for writing with AI on mobile devices, which manipulate levels of initiative and control. With AI suggestions, people wrote less actively, yet felt they were the author. In both designs, AI increased text length and was perceived to influence wording.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-01T13:57:11Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)
• IART: Intent-aware Response Ranking with Transformers in Information-seeking Conversation Systems [80.0781718687327]
  We analyze user intent patterns in information-seeking conversations and propose an intent-aware neural response ranking model "IART" IART is built on top of the integration of user intent modeling and language representation learning with the Transformer architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T05:59:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.