Dealing with Annotator Disagreement in Hate Speech Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08266v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:19:50 GMT
• Title: Dealing with Annotator Disagreement in Hate Speech Classification
• Authors: Somaiyeh Dehghan, Mehmet Umut Sen, Berrin Yanikoglu,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines strategies for addressing annotator disagreement, an issue that has been largely overlooked. We evaluate different approaches to deal with annotator disagreement regarding hate speech classification in Turkish tweets, based on a fine-tuned BERT model. Our work highlights the importance of the problem and provides state-of-art benchmark results for detection and understanding of hate speech in online discourse.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Hate speech detection is a crucial task, especially on social media, where harmful content can spread quickly. Implementing machine learning models to automatically identify and address hate speech is essential for mitigating its impact and preventing its proliferation. The first step in developing an effective hate speech detection model is to acquire a high-quality dataset for training. Labeled data is foundational for most natural language processing tasks, but categorizing hate speech is difficult due to the diverse and often subjective nature of hate speech, which can lead to varying interpretations and disagreements among annotators. This paper examines strategies for addressing annotator disagreement, an issue that has been largely overlooked. In particular, we evaluate different approaches to deal with annotator disagreement regarding hate speech classification in Turkish tweets, based on a fine-tuned BERT model. Our work highlights the importance of the problem and provides state-of-art benchmark results for detection and understanding of hate speech in online discourse.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Sentiment Analysis Framework for Hate Speech Detection: Implementing Binary and Multiclass Classification Strategy [0.0]
  We propose a new multitask model integrated with shared emotional representations to detect hate speech across the English language. We conclude that utilizing sentiment analysis and a Transformer-based trained model considerably improves hate speech detection across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T04:11:33Z)
• An Investigation of Large Language Models for Real-World Hate Speech Detection [46.15140831710683]
  A major limitation of existing methods is that hate speech detection is a highly contextual problem. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in several natural language tasks. Our study reveals that a meticulously crafted reasoning prompt can effectively capture the context of hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-07T00:39:33Z)
• Hate Speech Detection via Dual Contrastive Learning [25.878271501274245]
  We propose a novel dual contrastive learning framework for hate speech detection. Our framework jointly optimize the self-supervised and the supervised contrastive learning loss for capturing span-level information. We conduct experiments on two publicly available English datasets, and experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T13:23:36Z)
• CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Network [52.85130555886915]
  CoSyn is a context-synergized neural network that explicitly incorporates user- and conversational context for detecting implicit hate speech in online conversations. We show that CoSyn outperforms all our baselines in detecting implicit hate speech with absolute improvements in the range of 1.24% - 57.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:30:43Z)
• ToKen: Task Decomposition and Knowledge Infusion for Few-Shot Hate Speech Detection [85.68684067031909]
  We frame this problem as a few-shot learning task, and show significant gains with decomposing the task into its "constituent" parts. In addition, we see that infusing knowledge from reasoning datasets (e.g. Atomic 2020) improves the performance even further.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T05:10:08Z)
• Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection: A Comparative Study [54.42226495344908]
  We present here a large-scale empirical comparison of deep and shallow hate-speech detection methods. Our goal is to illuminate progress in the area, and identify strengths and weaknesses in the current state-of-the-art. In doing so we aim to provide guidance as to the use of hate-speech detection in practice, quantify the state-of-the-art, and identify future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-19T03:48:20Z)
• Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Lingual Hate Speech Detection [115.1352779982269]
  In this paper we focus on cross-lingual transfer learning to support hate speech detection in low-resource languages. We leverage cross-lingual word embeddings to train our neural network systems on the source language and apply it to the target language. We investigate the issue of label imbalance of hate speech datasets, since the high ratio of non-hate examples compared to hate examples often leads to low model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T20:48:14Z)
• Detection of Hate Speech using BERT and Hate Speech Word Embedding with Deep Model [0.5801044612920815]
  This paper investigates the feasibility of leveraging domain-specific word embedding in Bidirectional LSTM based deep model to automatically detect/classify hate speech. The experiments showed that domainspecific word embedding with the Bidirectional LSTM based deep model achieved a 93% f1-score while BERT achieved up to 96% f1-score on a combined balanced dataset from available hate speech datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T11:42:54Z)
• Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech [22.420275418616242]
  This work introduces a theoretically-justified taxonomy of implicit hate speech and a benchmark corpus with fine-grained labels for each message. We present systematic analyses of our dataset using contemporary baselines to detect and explain implicit hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T16:52:56Z)
• AngryBERT: Joint Learning Target and Emotion for Hate Speech Detection [5.649040805759824]
  This paper proposes a novel multitask learning-based model, AngryBERT, which jointly learns hate speech detection with sentiment classification and target identification as secondary relevant tasks. Experiment results show that AngryBERT outperforms state-of-the-art single-task-learning and multitask learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-14T16:17:26Z)
• Learning Explicit Prosody Models and Deep Speaker Embeddings for Atypical Voice Conversion [60.808838088376675]
  We propose a VC system with explicit prosodic modelling and deep speaker embedding learning. A prosody corrector takes in phoneme embeddings to infer typical phoneme duration and pitch values. A conversion model takes phoneme embeddings and typical prosody features as inputs to generate the converted speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T13:08:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.