Learning to Coordinate with Experts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09583v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:41:55 GMT
• Title: Learning to Coordinate with Experts
• Authors: Mohamad H. Danesh, Tu Trinh, Benjamin Plaut, Nguyen X. Khanh,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a fundamental coordination problem called Learning to Yield and Request Control. The objective is to learn a strategy that determines when to act autonomously and when to seek expert assistance. To facilitate empirical research, we introduce YRC-Bench, an open-source benchmark featuring diverse domains.
• Score: 5.012314384895538
• License:
• Abstract: When deployed in dynamic environments, AI agents will inevitably encounter challenges that exceed their individual capabilities. Leveraging assistance from expert agents-whether human or AI-can significantly enhance safety and performance in such situations. However, querying experts is often costly, necessitating the development of agents that can efficiently request and utilize expert guidance. In this paper, we introduce a fundamental coordination problem called Learning to Yield and Request Control (YRC), where the objective is to learn a strategy that determines when to act autonomously and when to seek expert assistance. We consider a challenging practical setting in which an agent does not interact with experts during training but must adapt to novel environmental changes and expert interventions at test time. To facilitate empirical research, we introduce YRC-Bench, an open-source benchmark featuring diverse domains. YRC-Bench provides a standardized Gym-like API, simulated experts, evaluation pipeline, and implementation of competitive baselines. Towards tackling the YRC problem, we propose a novel validation approach and investigate the performance of various learning methods across diverse environments, yielding insights that can guide future research.

Related papers

• HARP: Human-Assisted Regrouping with Permutation Invariant Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [22.820017018732994]
  We propose HARP (Human-Assisted Regrouping with Permutation Invariant Critic), a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for group-oriented tasks. HARP integrates automatic agent regrouping with strategic human assistance during deployment, enabling and allowing non-experts to offer effective guidance. In multiple collaboration scenarios, our approach is able to leverage limited guidance from non-experts and enhance performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T06:54:36Z)
• TeamLoRA: Boosting Low-Rank Adaptation with Expert Collaboration and Competition [61.91764883512776]
  We introduce an innovative PEFT method, TeamLoRA, consisting of a collaboration and competition module for experts. By doing so, TeamLoRA connects the experts as a "Team" with internal collaboration and competition, enabling a faster and more accurate PEFT paradigm for multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:58:53Z)
• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimization [60.00631098364391]
  PromptAgent is an optimization method that crafts expert-level prompts equivalent in quality to those handcrafted by experts. Inspired by human-like trial-and-error exploration, PromptAgent induces precise expert-level insights and in-depth instructions. We apply PromptAgent to 12 tasks spanning three practical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T07:47:01Z)
• IxDRL: A Novel Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning Toolkit based on Analyses of Interestingness [0.0]
  We propose a new framework based on analyses of interestingness. Our tool provides various measures of RL agent competence stemming from interestingness analysis. We show that our framework can provide agent designers with insights about RL agent competence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T02:43:19Z)
• Teachable Reinforcement Learning via Advice Distillation [161.43457947665073]
  We propose a new supervision paradigm for interactive learning based on "teachable" decision-making systems that learn from structured advice provided by an external teacher. We show that agents that learn from advice can acquire new skills with significantly less human supervision than standard reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T03:22:57Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning via Genetic Curriculum [5.421464476555662]
  Genetic curriculum is an algorithm that automatically identifies scenarios in which the agent currently fails and generates an associated curriculum. Our empirical studies show improvement in robustness over the existing state of the art algorithms, providing training curricula that result in agents being 2 - 8x times less likely to fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T01:14:20Z)
• Towards Collaborative Question Answering: A Preliminary Study [63.91687114660126]
  We propose CollabQA, a novel QA task in which several expert agents coordinated by a moderator work together to answer questions that cannot be answered with any single agent alone. We make a synthetic dataset of a large knowledge graph that can be distributed to experts. We show that the problem can be challenging without introducing prior to the collaboration structure, unless experts are perfect and uniform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T14:27:00Z)
• Autonomous Reinforcement Learning: Formalism and Benchmarking [106.25788536376007]
  Real-world embodied learning, such as that performed by humans and animals, is situated in a continual, non-episodic world. Common benchmark tasks in RL are episodic, with the environment resetting between trials to provide the agent with multiple attempts. This discrepancy presents a major challenge when attempting to take RL algorithms developed for episodic simulated environments and run them on real-world platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T16:28:06Z)
• Human AI interaction loop training: New approach for interactive reinforcement learning [0.0]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) in various decision-making tasks of machine learning provides effective results with an agent learning from a stand-alone reward function. RL presents unique challenges with large amounts of environment states and action spaces, as well as in the determination of rewards. Imitation Learning (IL) offers a promising solution for those challenges using a teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.