Do We Need to Verify Step by Step? Rethinking Process Supervision from a Theoretical Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10581v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:21:56 GMT
• Title: Do We Need to Verify Step by Step? Rethinking Process Supervision from a Theoretical Perspective
• Authors: Zeyu Jia, Alexander Rakhlin, Tengyang Xie,
• Abstract summary: We show that under standard data coverage assumptions, reinforcement learning is no more statistically difficult than through process supervision. We prove that any policy's advantage function can serve as an optimal process reward model.
• Score: 59.61868506896214
• License:
• Abstract: As large language models have evolved, it has become crucial to distinguish between process supervision and outcome supervision -- two key reinforcement learning approaches to complex reasoning tasks. While process supervision offers intuitive advantages for long-term credit assignment, the precise relationship between these paradigms has remained an open question. Conventional wisdom suggests that outcome supervision is fundamentally more challenging due to the trajectory-level coverage problem, leading to significant investment in collecting fine-grained process supervision data. In this paper, we take steps towards resolving this debate. Our main theorem shows that, under standard data coverage assumptions, reinforcement learning through outcome supervision is no more statistically difficult than through process supervision, up to polynomial factors in horizon. At the core of this result lies the novel Change of Trajectory Measure Lemma -- a technical tool that bridges return-based trajectory measure and step-level distribution shift. Furthermore, for settings with access to a verifier or a rollout capability, we prove that any policy's advantage function can serve as an optimal process reward model, providing a direct connection between outcome and process supervision. These findings suggest that the empirically observed performance gap -- if any -- between outcome and process supervision likely stems from algorithmic limitations rather than inherent statistical difficulties, potentially transforming how we approach data collection and algorithm design for reinforcement learning.

Related papers

• Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation [21.85925512674604]
  Existing reinforcement learning strategies based on outcome supervision have proven effective in enhancing the performance of large language models for code generation. In this paper, we propose a process-supervised reinforcement learning strategy to tackle complex code generation tasks. We show that process-supervised reinforcement learning significantly surpasses methods relying solely on outcome supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:22:06Z)
• PSPO*: An Effective Process-supervised Policy Optimization for Reasoning Alignment [20.053439187190914]
  We develop PSPO-WRS, which considers the number of reasoning steps in determining reward scores and utilizes an adjusted Weibull distribution for nonlinear reward shaping. Experimental results on six mathematical reasoning datasets demonstrate that PSPO-WRS consistently outperforms current mainstream models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T16:03:51Z)
• Step-by-Step Reasoning for Math Problems via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlo [55.452453947359736]
  We introduce a novel verification method based on Twisted Sequential Monte Carlo (TSMC) We apply TSMC to Large Language Models by estimating the expected future rewards at partial solutions. This approach results in a more straightforward training target that eliminates the need for step-wise human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T18:17:54Z)
• Rethinking State Disentanglement in Causal Reinforcement Learning [78.12976579620165]
  Causality provides rigorous theoretical support for ensuring that the underlying states can be uniquely recovered through identifiability. We revisit this research line and find that incorporating RL-specific context can reduce unnecessary assumptions in previous identifiability analyses for latent states. We propose a novel approach for general partially observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) by replacing the complicated structural constraints in previous methods with two simple constraints for transition and reward preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T06:49:13Z)
• Process Variant Analysis Across Continuous Features: A Novel Framework [0.0]
  This research addresses the challenge of effectively segmenting cases within operational processes. We present a novel approach employing a sliding window technique combined with the earth mover's distance to detect changes in control flow behavior. We validate our methodology through a real-life case study in collaboration with UWV, the Dutch employee insurance agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T16:10:13Z)
• Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing [61.98556945939045]
  We propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories. Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T15:18:33Z)
• Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partial Observable Reinforcement Learning [74.67655210734338]
  In most real-world reinforcement learning applications, state information is only partially observable, which breaks the Markov decision process assumption. We develop a representation-based perspective that leads to a coherent framework and tractable algorithmic approach for practical reinforcement learning from partial observations. We empirically demonstrate the proposed algorithm can surpass state-of-the-art performance with partial observations across various benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T23:56:58Z)
• Unsupervised approaches based on optimal transport and convex analysis for inverse problems in imaging [6.202226277935329]
  We review theoretically principled unsupervised learning schemes for solving imaging inverse problems. We focus on methods rooted in optimal transport and convex analysis. We give an overview of a recent line of works on provably convergent learned optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:04:37Z)
• SAIS: Supervising and Augmenting Intermediate Steps for Document-Level Relation Extraction [51.27558374091491]
  We propose to explicitly teach the model to capture relevant contexts and entity types by supervising and augmenting intermediate steps (SAIS) for relation extraction. Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our proposed SAIS method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision, but also retrieves the corresponding supporting evidence more accurately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T17:37:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.