Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12215v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 07:21:11 GMT
• Title: Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?
• Authors: Zhiyuan Zeng, Qinyuan Cheng, Zhangyue Yin, Yunhua Zhou, Xipeng Qiu,
• Abstract summary: We study whether o1-like large language models (LLMs) truly possess test-time scaling capabilities. We find that longer CoTs of these o1-like models do not consistently enhance accuracy. We propose Shortest Majority Vote, a method that combines parallel scaling strategies with CoT length characteristics.
• Score: 61.85289698610747
• License:
• Abstract: The advent of test-time scaling in large language models (LLMs), exemplified by OpenAI's o1 series, has advanced reasoning capabilities by scaling computational resource allocation during inference. While successors like QwQ, Deepseek-R1 (R1) and LIMO replicate these advancements, whether these models truly possess test-time scaling capabilities remains underexplored. This study found that longer CoTs of these o1-like models do not consistently enhance accuracy; in fact, correct solutions are often shorter than incorrect ones for the same questions. Further investigation shows this phenomenon is closely related to models' self-revision capabilities - longer CoTs contain more self-revisions, which often lead to performance degradation. We then compare sequential and parallel scaling strategies on QwQ, R1 and LIMO, finding that parallel scaling achieves better coverage and scalability. Based on these insights, we propose Shortest Majority Vote, a method that combines parallel scaling strategies with CoT length characteristics, significantly improving models' test-time scalability compared to conventional majority voting approaches.

Related papers

• S*: Test Time Scaling for Code Generation [55.11863577956177]
  We propose S*, the first hybrid test-time scaling framework for code generation. S* substantially improves the coverage and selection accuracy of generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T09:18:53Z)
• s1: Simple test-time scaling [148.4204982041058]
  Test-time scaling is a promising new approach to language modeling that uses extra test-time compute to improve performance. We seek the simplest approach to achieve test-time scaling and strong reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T18:48:08Z)
• Advancing Language Model Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning and Inference Scaling [52.34735382627312]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. Existing approaches mainly rely on imitation learning and struggle to achieve effective test-time scaling. We present T1 to scale reinforcement learning by encouraging exploration and understand inference scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T18:33:33Z)
• Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs [76.43407125275202]
  o1-like models can emulate human-like long-time thinking during inference. This paper presents the first comprehensive study on the prevalent issue of overthinking in these models. We propose strategies to mitigate overthinking, streamlining reasoning processes without compromising accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T18:55:12Z)
• Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters [27.656263126925815]
  We study the scaling of inference-time computation in LLMs. We find that in both cases, the effectiveness of different approaches to scaling test-time compute critically varies depending on the difficulty of the prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:35:05Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.