From Correctness to Comprehension: AI Agents for Personalized Error Diagnosis in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13789v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:57:51 GMT
• Title: From Correctness to Comprehension: AI Agents for Personalized Error Diagnosis in Education
• Authors: Yi-Fan Zhang, Hang Li, Dingjie Song, Lichao Sun, Tianlong Xu, Qingsong Wen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive mathematical reasoning capabilities, achieving near-perfect performance on benchmarks like GSM8K.<n>However, their application in personalized education remains limited due to an overemphasis on correctness over error diagnosis and feedback generation.<n>We introduce textbfMathCCS, a benchmark designed for systematic error analysis and tailored feedback.<n>Second, we develop a sequential error analysis framework that leverages historical data to track trends and improve diagnostic precision.<n>Third, we propose a multi-agent collaborative framework that combines a Time Series Agent for historical analysis and an MLLM Agent for real-
• Score: 24.970741456147447
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, have demonstrated impressive mathematical reasoning capabilities, achieving near-perfect performance on benchmarks like GSM8K. However, their application in personalized education remains limited due to an overemphasis on correctness over error diagnosis and feedback generation. Current models fail to provide meaningful insights into the causes of student mistakes, limiting their utility in educational contexts. To address these challenges, we present three key contributions. First, we introduce \textbf{MathCCS} (Mathematical Classification and Constructive Suggestions), a multi-modal benchmark designed for systematic error analysis and tailored feedback. MathCCS includes real-world problems, expert-annotated error categories, and longitudinal student data. Evaluations of state-of-the-art models, including \textit{Qwen2-VL}, \textit{LLaVA-OV}, \textit{Claude-3.5-Sonnet} and \textit{GPT-4o}, reveal that none achieved classification accuracy above 30\% or generated high-quality suggestions (average scores below 4/10), highlighting a significant gap from human-level performance. Second, we develop a sequential error analysis framework that leverages historical data to track trends and improve diagnostic precision. Finally, we propose a multi-agent collaborative framework that combines a Time Series Agent for historical analysis and an MLLM Agent for real-time refinement, enhancing error classification and feedback generation. Together, these contributions provide a robust platform for advancing personalized education, bridging the gap between current AI capabilities and the demands of real-world teaching.

Related papers

• FindTheFlaws: Annotated Errors for Detecting Flawed Reasoning and Scalable Oversight Research [0.6286531904189063]
  Approaches to scaling AI supervision include debate, critique, and prover-verifier games. We present FindTheFlaws, a group of five diverse datasets spanning medicine, mathematics, science, coding, and the Lojban language. We evaluate frontier models' critiquing capabilities and observe a range of performance that can be leveraged for scalable oversight experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T06:38:30Z)
• VLRMBench: A Comprehensive and Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Reward Models [40.87249469370042]
  Vision-language models (VLRMs) have become increasingly pivotal in the reasoning process. Existing benchmarks for vision-language RMs (VLRMs) typically assess only a single aspect of their capabilities. We propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark, dubbed as VLRMBench, encompassing 12,634 questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T15:52:57Z)
• Performance Comparison of Large Language Models on Advanced Calculus Problems [0.0]
  The study aims to evaluate models' accuracy, reliability, and problem-solving capabilities, including ChatGPT 4o, Gemini Advanced with 1.5 Pro, Copilot Pro, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Meta AI, Mistral AI, and Perplexity. The results highlight significant trends and patterns in the models' performance, revealing both their strengths and weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T23:26:12Z)
• Learning to Solve and Verify: A Self-Play Framework for Code and Test Generation [69.62857948698436]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have improved their performance on coding benchmarks. However, improvement is plateauing due to the exhaustion of readily available high-quality data. We propose Sol-Ver, a self-play solver-verifier framework that jointly improves a single model's code and test generation capacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:32:19Z)
• Error Classification of Large Language Models on Math Word Problems: A Dynamically Adaptive Framework [64.83955753606443]
  Math Word Problems serve as a crucial benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' reasoning abilities.<n>Current error classification methods rely on static and predefined categories.<n>We introduce MWPES-300K, a comprehensive dataset containing 304,865 error samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T16:17:57Z)
• ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
  We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions. Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z)
• IDGen: Item Discrimination Induced Prompt Generation for LLM Evaluation [15.895295957106772]
  We propose an ID-induced prompt synthesis framework for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) Our data synthesis framework prioritizes both breadth and specificity. It can generate prompts that comprehensively evaluate the capabilities of LLMs. We will release a dataset of over 3,000 carefully crafted prompts to facilitate evaluation research of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:29:12Z)
• Is Difficulty Calibration All We Need? Towards More Practical Membership Inference Attacks [16.064233621959538]
  We propose a query-efficient and computation-efficient MIA that directly textbfRe-levertextbfAges the original membershitextbfP scores to mtextbfItigate the errors in textbfDifficulty calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T11:59:42Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Beyond Accuracy [50.09931172314218]
  We introduce ReasonEval, a new methodology for evaluating the quality of reasoning steps.<n>We show that ReasonEval consistently outperforms baseline methods in the meta-evaluation datasets.<n>We observe that ReasonEval can play a significant role in data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T17:18:04Z)
• Overcoming Pitfalls in Graph Contrastive Learning Evaluation: Toward Comprehensive Benchmarks [60.82579717007963]
  We introduce an enhanced evaluation framework designed to more accurately gauge the effectiveness, consistency, and overall capability of Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T01:47:56Z)
• MAFALDA: A Benchmark and Comprehensive Study of Fallacy Detection and Classification [8.687019236393123]
  We introduce MAFALDA, a benchmark for fallacy classification that merges and unites previous fallacy datasets. It comes with a taxonomy that aligns, refines, and unifies existing classifications of fallacies. We propose a new annotation scheme tailored for subjective NLP tasks, and a new evaluation method designed to handle subjectivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T10:35:11Z)
• Generalizable Error Modeling for Human Data Annotation: Evidence From an Industry-Scale Search Data Annotation Program [0.0]
  This paper presents a predictive error model trained to detect potential errors in search relevance annotation tasks. We show that errors can be predicted with moderate model performance (AUC=0.65-0.75) and that model performance generalizes well across applications. We demonstrate the usefulness of the model in the context of auditing, where prioritizing tasks with high predicted error probabilities considerably increases the amount of corrected annotation errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T21:21:19Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis Study for Chinese Spelling Check [53.152011258252315]
  We show that using phonetic and graphic information reasonably is effective for Chinese Spelling Check. Models are sensitive to the error distribution of the test set, which reflects the shortcomings of models. The commonly used benchmark, SIGHAN, can not reliably evaluate models' performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:02:38Z)
• Discover, Explanation, Improvement: An Automatic Slice Detection Framework for Natural Language Processing [72.14557106085284]
  slice detection models (SDM) automatically identify underperforming groups of datapoints. This paper proposes a benchmark named "Discover, Explain, improve (DEIM)" for classification NLP tasks. Our evaluation shows that Edisa can accurately select error-prone datapoints with informative semantic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T19:00:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.