Ontological models cannot adequately represent state update for sequential measurement of incompatible observables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15615v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:38:23 GMT
• Title: Ontological models cannot adequately represent state update for sequential measurement of incompatible observables
• Authors: Alisson Tezzin, Bárbara Amaral, Jonte R. Hance,
• Abstract summary: We argue that incompatibility is sufficient to stop ontological models from being able to adequately represent a scenario.<n>This is because, as we argue, the quantum state update rule requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability.<n>Building on this, we argue that classical wave theory is equally incompatible with ontological models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ontological models (as used in the generalized contextuality literature) play a central role in current research on quantum foundations, serving as a framework for defining classicality, constructing classical analogues of key quantum phenomena, and even examining the ontology of quantum states. In this work, we analyse the quantum state update rule in these models and argue that incompatibility -- or, equivalently, order-dependent theoretical predictions of sequential measurements -- is sufficient to stop them from being able to adequately represent a scenario. This is because, as we argue, the quantum state update rule requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability, which in turn renders predictions of sequential measurements order-independent. This implies that ontological models, even contextual ones, must either act differently to what we would expect given the quantum state update rule, or cannot model quantum behaviour. Building on this, we argue that classical wave theory is equally incompatible with ontological models, challenging the notion that generalized contextuality serves as a signature of classicality.

Related papers

• Operationally classical simulation of quantum states [41.94295877935867]
  A classical state-preparation device cannot generate superpositions and hence its emitted states must commute.<n>We show that no such simulation exists, thereby certifying quantum coherence.<n>Our approach is a possible avenue to understand how and to what extent quantum states defy generic models based on classical devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T15:25:03Z)
• An Equivalence Between Compatibility and Deterministic Underlying States in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  This paper establishes an equivalence between the pairwise compatibility of all observables in a scenario, and our ability to create a deterministic underlying-state model for that scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T20:26:37Z)
• Does quantum information require additional structure? [0.0]
  We introduce the correspondence principle between physical reality and mathematical models. We consider the status of quantum information in the standard quantum model. We present the Chyli'nski model as an example of quantum relational space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T20:39:20Z)
• Derivation of Standard Quantum Theory via State Discrimination [53.64687146666141]
  General Probabilistic Theories (GPTs) is a new information theoretical approach to single out standard quantum theory. We focus on the bound of the performance for an information task called state discrimination in general models. We characterize standard quantum theory out of general models in GPTs by the bound of the performance for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T00:02:11Z)
• A Semantics for Counterfactuals in Quantum Causal Models [0.0]
  We introduce a formalism for the evaluation of counterfactual queries in the framework of quantum causal models. We define a suitable extension of Pearl's notion of a 'classical structural causal model' We show that every classical (probabilistic) structural causal model can be extended to a quantum structural causal model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T05:00:14Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• A framework for nonrelativistic isotropic models based on generalized uncertainty principles [0.0]
  We show simple dimensional analysis allows for building a unified framework containing any isotropic generalized uncertainty principle (iGUP) At last, we translate current bounds on three often investigated GUP models into bounds on parameters of such unified iGUP framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T09:37:53Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Non-equilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice models [68.8204255655161]
  We show how generic non-Hermitian tight-binding lattice models can be realized in an unconditional, quantum-mechanically consistent manner. We focus on the quantum steady states of such models for both fermionic and bosonic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T18:56:44Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)
• Solvable Criterion for the Contextuality of any Prepare-and-Measure Scenario [0.0]
  An operationally noncontextual ontological model of the quantum statistics associated with the prepare-and-measure scenario is constructed. A mathematical criterion, called unit separability, is formulated as the relevant classicality criterion. We reformulate our results in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T18:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.