ExpandR: Teaching Dense Retrievers Beyond Queries with LLM Guidance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17057v3
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 12:21:57 GMT
• Title: ExpandR: Teaching Dense Retrievers Beyond Queries with LLM Guidance
• Authors: Sijia Yao, Pengcheng Huang, Zhenghao Liu, Yu Gu, Yukun Yan, Shi Yu, Ge Yu,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing dense retrieval through query augmentation.<n>In this work, we propose ExpandR, a unified LLM-augmented dense retrieval framework.<n> Experimental results on multiple benchmarks show that ExpandR consistently outperforms strong baselines.
• Score: 21.777817032607405
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing dense retrieval through query augmentation. However, most existing methods treat the LLM and the retriever as separate modules, overlooking the alignment between generation and ranking objectives. In this work, we propose ExpandR, a unified LLM-augmented dense retrieval framework that jointly optimizes both the LLM and the retriever. ExpandR employs the LLM to generate semantically rich query expansions, which are leveraged to enhance the retriever's training. Simultaneously, the LLM is trained using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), guided by a carefully designed reward function that balances retrieval effectiveness and generation consistency. This joint optimization paradigm enables mutual adaptation between the LLM and the retriever, resulting in query expansions that are both informative and well-suited for retrieval. Experimental results on multiple benchmarks show that ExpandR consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving more than a 5% improvement in retrieval performance. All codes are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/ExpandR.

Related papers

• Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Language-Model-Based Information Retriever via Query-Document Co-Augmentation [35.70731674603417]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>We present an LLM-based retriever empowered to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>Our approach significantly enhances LLM-based retrieval performance in both sparse and dense settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T14:14:43Z)
• Exp4Fuse: A Rank Fusion Framework for Enhanced Sparse Retrieval using Large Language Model-based Query Expansion [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential in generating hypothetical documents for query expansion.<n>We introduce a novel fusion ranking framework, Exp4Fuse, which enhances the performance of sparse retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T08:44:34Z)
• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• Unleashing the Power of LLMs in Dense Retrieval with Query Likelihood Modeling [69.84963245729826]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown compelling semantic understanding capabilities. Dense retrieval is a crucial task in Information Retrieval (IR) and is the foundation for downstream tasks as re-ranking. We introduce an auxiliary task of QL estimation to yield a better backbone for contrast learning a discriminative retriever.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T16:03:59Z)
• Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning [50.419872452397684]
  Search-R1 is an extension of reinforcement learning for reasoning frameworks.<n>It generates search queries during step-by-step reasoning with real-time retrieval.<n>It improves performance by 41% (Qwen2.5-7B) and 20% (Qwen2.5-3B) over various RAG baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:26:39Z)
• Lost in Sequence: Do Large Language Models Understand Sequential Recommendation? [33.92662524009036]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for recommendation thanks to their advanced textual understanding ability and context-awareness. We propose a method that enhances the integration of sequential information into LLMs by distilling the user representations extracted from a pre-trained-SRec model into LLMs. Our experiments show that LLM-SRec enhances LLMs' ability to understand users' item interaction sequences, ultimately leading to improved recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T17:41:09Z)
• Invar-RAG: Invariant LLM-aligned Retrieval for Better Generation [43.630437906898635]
  We propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning architecture called Invar-RAG. In the retrieval stage, an LLM-based retriever is constructed by integrating LoRA-based representation learning. In the generation stage, a refined fine-tuning method is employed to improve LLM accuracy in generating answers based on retrieved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:25:37Z)
• Fine-Grained Guidance for Retrievers: Leveraging LLMs' Feedback in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [20.420575358183687]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven to be an effective method for mitigating hallucination issues inherent in large language models (LLMs) Previous approaches typically train retrievers based on semantic similarity, lacking optimization for RAG. We propose a novel framework, FiGRet, which leverages the language capabilities of LLMs to construct examples from a more granular, information-centric perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T14:42:39Z)
• LLM4PR: Improving Post-Ranking in Search Engine with Large Language Models [9.566432486156335]
  Large Language Models for Post-Ranking in search engine (LLM4PR) We introduce a novel paradigm named Large Language Models for Post-Ranking in search engine (LLM4PR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T08:36:16Z)
• Grounding by Trying: LLMs with Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced Retrieval [55.63711219190506]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with posing the right search queries. We introduce $underlineLe$arning to $underlineRe$trieve by $underlineT$rying (LeReT) LeReT can improve the absolute retrieval accuracy by up to 29% and the downstream generator evaluations by 17%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:02:54Z)
• Learning to Retrieve Iteratively for In-Context Learning [56.40100968649039]
  iterative retrieval is a novel framework that empowers retrievers to make iterative decisions through policy optimization. We instantiate an iterative retriever for composing in-context learning exemplars and apply it to various semantic parsing tasks. By adding only 4M additional parameters for state encoding, we convert an off-the-shelf dense retriever into a stateful iterative retriever.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T21:07:55Z)
• Making Large Language Models A Better Foundation For Dense Retrieval [19.38740248464456]
  Dense retrieval needs to learn discriminative text embeddings to represent the semantic relationship between query and document. It may benefit from the using of large language models (LLMs), given LLMs' strong capability on semantic understanding. We propose LLaRA (LLM adapted for dense RetrievAl), which works as a post-hoc adaptation of dense retrieval application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T15:10:35Z)
• Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generation [48.07830615309543]
  This paper focuses on improving large language models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in retrieved passages and by providing citations. We propose a new framework, AGREE, that improves the grounding from a holistic perspective. Our framework tunes LLMs to selfground the claims in their responses and provide accurate citations to retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T03:22:25Z)
• LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
  Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents. We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z)
• LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task [54.48899723591296]
  The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. We benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T16:32:54Z)
• Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline. This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z)
• LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset. Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)
• Large Language Models are Strong Zero-Shot Retriever [89.16756291653371]
  We propose a simple method that applies a large language model (LLM) to large-scale retrieval in zero-shot scenarios. Our method, the Language language model as Retriever (LameR), is built upon no other neural models but an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T14:45:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.