SRAG: Structured Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Entity Question Answering over Wikipedia Graph

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01346v2
• Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:27:24 GMT
• Title: SRAG: Structured Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Entity Question Answering over Wikipedia Graph
• Authors: Teng Lin, Yizhang Zhu, Yuyu Luo, Nan Tang,
• Abstract summary: Multi-entity question answering (MEQA) poses significant challenges for large language models.<n>This paper introduces a structured RAG framework that organizes extracted entities into relational tables.<n>Experiments on Wikipedia-based multi-entity QA tasks demonstrate that SRAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art long-context LLMs.
• Score: 10.297615455470133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-entity question answering (MEQA) poses significant challenges for large language models (LLMs), which often struggle to consolidate scattered information across multiple documents. An example question might be "What is the distribution of IEEE Fellows among various fields of study?", which requires retrieving information from diverse sources e.g., Wikipedia pages. The effectiveness of current retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods is limited by the LLMs' capacity to aggregate insights from numerous pages. To address this gap, this paper introduces a structured RAG (SRAG) framework that systematically organizes extracted entities into relational tables (e.g., tabulating entities with schema columns like "name" and "field of study") and then apply table-based reasoning techniques. Our approach decouples retrieval and reasoning, enabling LLMs to focus on structured data analysis rather than raw text aggregation. Extensive experiments on Wikipedia-based multi-entity QA tasks demonstrate that SRAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art long-context LLMs and RAG solutions, achieving a 29.6% improvement in accuracy. The results underscore the efficacy of structuring unstructured data to enhance LLMs' reasoning capabilities.

Related papers

• MultiConIR: Towards multi-condition Information Retrieval [57.6405602406446]
  We introduce MultiConIR, the first benchmark designed to evaluate retrieval models in multi-condition scenarios. We propose three tasks to assess retrieval and reranking models on multi-condition robustness, monotonic relevance ranking, and query format sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T05:02:03Z)
• Multiple Abstraction Level Retrieve Augment Generation [4.516242893120263]
  A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model powered by a large language model (LLM) provides a faster and more cost-effective solution for adapting to new data and knowledge.<n>We propose a novel RAG approach that uses chunks of multiple abstraction levels (MAL), including multi-sentence-level, paragraph-level, section-level, and document-level.<n>Compared to traditional single-level RAG approaches, our approach improves AI evaluated answer correctness of Q/A by 25.739% on Glyco-related papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T13:49:39Z)
• Generative Retrieval for Book search [106.67655212825025]
  We propose an effective Generative retrieval framework for Book Search. It features two main components: data augmentation and outline-oriented book encoding. Experiments on a proprietary Baidu dataset demonstrate that GBS outperforms strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-19T12:57:13Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
  We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.<n>This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
• A Survey of Query Optimization in Large Language Models [10.255235456427037]
  RAG mitigates the limitations of Large Language Models by dynamically retrieving and leveraging up-to-date relevant information.<n>QO has emerged as a critical element, playing a pivotal role in determining the effectiveness of RAG's retrieval stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T13:26:04Z)
• Holistic Reasoning with Long-Context LMs: A Benchmark for Database Operations on Massive Textual Data [6.195658947075431]
  We introduce HoloBench, a framework that brings database reasoning operations into text-based contexts. We show that the amount of information in the context has a bigger influence on LCLM performance than the context length. We find that tasks requiring the aggregation of multiple pieces of information show a noticeable drop in accuracy as context length increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T19:04:13Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.158785168036662]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:09:27Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• Multi-Head RAG: Solving Multi-Aspect Problems with LLMs [13.638439488923671]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) Existing RAG solutions do not focus on queries that may require fetching multiple documents with substantially different contents. This paper introduces Multi-Head RAG (MRAG), a novel scheme designed to address this gap with a simple yet powerful idea.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T16:59:38Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• An In-Context Schema Understanding Method for Knowledge Base Question Answering [70.87993081445127]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in language understanding and can be used to solve this task. Existing methods bypass this challenge by initially employing LLMs to generate drafts of logic forms without schema-specific details. We propose a simple In-Context Understanding (ICSU) method that enables LLMs to directly understand schemas by leveraging in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T04:19:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.