MOHPER: Multi-objective Hyperparameter Optimization Framework for E-commerce Retrieval System
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05227v1
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:25:08 GMT
- Title: MOHPER: Multi-objective Hyperparameter Optimization Framework for E-commerce Retrieval System
- Authors: Jungbae Park, Heonseok Jang,
- Abstract summary: MOHPER is a multi-objective optimization framework for e-commerce sites.<n>It jointly optimize click-through rate (CTR), click-through conversion rate (CTCVR) and relevant objectives.<n>It substantiates its practical efficacy in achieving a balanced optimization that aligns with both user satisfaction and revenue goals.
- Score: 1.5960546024967321
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: E-commerce search optimization has evolved to include a wider range of metrics that reflect user engagement and business objectives. Modern search frameworks now incorporate advanced quality features, such as sales counts and document-query relevance, to better align search results with these goals. Traditional methods typically focus on click-through rate (CTR) as a measure of engagement or relevance, but this can miss true purchase intent, creating a gap between user interest and actual conversions. Joint training with the click-through conversion rate (CTCVR) has become essential for understanding buying behavior, although its sparsity poses challenges for reliable optimization. This study presents MOHPER, a Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization framework for E-commerce Retrieval systems. Utilizing Bayesian optimization and sampling, it jointly optimizes both CTR, CTCVR, and relevant objectives, focusing on engagement and conversion of the users. In addition, to improve the selection of the best configuration from multi-objective optimization, we suggest advanced methods for hyperparameter selection, including a meta-configuration voting strategy and a cumulative training approach that leverages prior optimal configurations, to improve speeds of training and efficiency. Currently deployed in a live setting, our proposed framework substantiates its practical efficacy in achieving a balanced optimization that aligns with both user satisfaction and revenue goals.
Related papers
- Review, Refine, Repeat: Understanding Iterative Decoding of AI Agents with Dynamic Evaluation and Selection [71.92083784393418]
Inference-time methods such as Best-of-N (BON) sampling offer a simple yet effective alternative to improve performance.
We propose Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD) which combines iterative refinement with dynamic candidate evaluation and selection guided by a verifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z) - Faster, Cheaper, Better: Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization for LLM and RAG Systems [8.438382004567961]
We introduce the first approach for multi-objective parameter optimization of cost, latency, safety and alignment over entire LLM and RAG systems.<n>We find that Bayesian optimization methods significantly outperform baseline approaches.<n>We conclude our work with important considerations for practitioners who are designing multi-objective RAG systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T20:52:06Z) - Provably Efficient Multi-Objective Bandit Algorithms under Preference-Centric Customization [24.533662423325943]
We study a preference-aware MO-MAB framework in the presence of explicit user preference.<n>This is the first theoretical study of customized MO-MAB optimization with explicit user preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T06:06:13Z) - Optima: Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [75.25394449773052]
Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show remarkable potential in collaborative problem-solving.
Yet they still face critical challenges: low communication efficiency, poor scalability, and a lack of effective parameter-updating optimization methods.
We present Optima, a novel framework that addresses these issues by significantly enhancing both communication efficiency and task effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:00:06Z) - MADA: Meta-Adaptive Optimizers through hyper-gradient Descent [73.1383658672682]
We introduce Meta-Adaptives (MADA), a unified framework that can generalize several known convergences and dynamically learn the most suitable one during training.
We empirically compare MADA to other populars on vision and language tasks, and find that MADA consistently outperforms Adam and other populars.
We also propose AVGrad, a modification of AMS that replaces the maximum operator with averaging, which is more suitable for hyper-gradient optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T00:16:46Z) - Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Active Preference Learning [18.066263838953223]
We propose a Bayesian optimization (BO) approach to identifying the most preferred solution in a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem.
To minimize the interaction cost with the decision maker (DM), we also propose an active learning strategy for the preference estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T15:24:36Z) - Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising.
We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising.
Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z) - Interactive Hyperparameter Optimization in Multi-Objective Problems via
Preference Learning [65.51668094117802]
We propose a human-centered interactive HPO approach tailored towards multi-objective machine learning (ML)
Instead of relying on the user guessing the most suitable indicator for their needs, our approach automatically learns an appropriate indicator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T09:22:05Z) - Accelerated Federated Learning with Decoupled Adaptive Optimization [53.230515878096426]
federated learning (FL) framework enables clients to collaboratively learn a shared model while keeping privacy of training data on clients.
Recently, many iterations efforts have been made to generalize centralized adaptive optimization methods, such as SGDM, Adam, AdaGrad, etc., to federated settings.
This work aims to develop novel adaptive optimization methods for FL from the perspective of dynamics of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T22:46:43Z) - Leveraging Trust for Joint Multi-Objective and Multi-Fidelity
Optimization [0.0]
This paper investigates a novel approach to Bayesian multi-objective and multi-fidelity (MOMF) optimization.
We suggest the innovative use of a trust metric to support simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives and data sources.
Our methods offer broad applicability in solving simulation problems in fields such as plasma physics and fluid dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-27T20:55:26Z) - Bayesian Optimization for Selecting Efficient Machine Learning Models [53.202224677485525]
We present a unified Bayesian Optimization framework for jointly optimizing models for both prediction effectiveness and training efficiency.
Experiments on model selection for recommendation tasks indicate models selected this way significantly improves model training efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T02:56:30Z) - Resource Aware Multifidelity Active Learning for Efficient Optimization [0.8717253904965373]
This paper introduces the Resource Aware Active Learning (RAAL) strategy to accelerate the optimization of black box functions.
The RAAL strategy optimally seeds multiple points at each allowing for a major speed up of the optimization task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T10:01:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.