Leveraging Trust for Joint Multi-Objective and Multi-Fidelity Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13901v3
• Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 08:43:27 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Trust for Joint Multi-Objective and Multi-Fidelity Optimization
• Authors: Faran Irshad, Stefan Karsch and Andreas D\"opp
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates a novel approach to Bayesian multi-objective and multi-fidelity (MOMF) optimization. We suggest the innovative use of a trust metric to support simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives and data sources. Our methods offer broad applicability in solving simulation problems in fields such as plasma physics and fluid dynamics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the pursuit of efficient optimization of expensive-to-evaluate systems, this paper investigates a novel approach to Bayesian multi-objective and multi-fidelity (MOMF) optimization. Traditional optimization methods, while effective, often encounter prohibitively high costs in multi-dimensional optimizations of one or more objectives. Multi-fidelity approaches offer potential remedies by utilizing multiple, less costly information sources, such as low-resolution simulations. However, integrating these two strategies presents a significant challenge. We suggest the innovative use of a trust metric to support simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives and data sources. Our method modifies a multi-objective optimization policy to incorporate the trust gain per evaluation cost as one objective in a Pareto optimization problem, enabling simultaneous MOMF at lower costs. We present and compare two MOMF optimization methods: a holistic approach selecting both the input parameters and the trust parameter jointly, and a sequential approach for benchmarking. Through benchmarks on synthetic test functions, our approach is shown to yield significant cost reductions - up to an order of magnitude compared to pure multi-objective optimization. Furthermore, we find that joint optimization of the trust and objective domains outperforms addressing them in sequential manner. We validate our results using the use case of optimizing laser-plasma acceleration simulations, demonstrating our method's potential in Pareto optimization of high-cost black-box functions. Implementing these methods in existing Bayesian frameworks is simple, and they can be readily extended to batch optimization. With their capability to handle various continuous or discrete fidelity dimensions, our techniques offer broad applicability in solving simulation problems in fields such as plasma physics and fluid dynamics.

Related papers

• Optima: Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [75.25394449773052]
  Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show remarkable potential in collaborative problem-solving. Yet they still face critical challenges: low communication efficiency, poor scalability, and a lack of effective parameter-updating optimization methods. We present Optima, a novel framework that addresses these issues by significantly enhancing both communication efficiency and task effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:00:06Z)
• Deep Pareto Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Objective Recommender Systems [60.91599969408029]
  optimizing multiple objectives simultaneously is an important task for recommendation platforms. Existing multi-objective recommender systems do not systematically consider such dynamic relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T02:19:49Z)
• End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
  The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality. This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives. It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z)
• Evolutionary Solution Adaption for Multi-Objective Metal Cutting Process Optimization [59.45414406974091]
  We introduce a framework for system flexibility that allows us to study the ability of an algorithm to transfer solutions from previous optimization tasks. We study the flexibility of NSGA-II, which we extend by two variants: 1) varying goals, that optimize solutions for two tasks simultaneously to obtain in-between source solutions expected to be more adaptable, and 2) active-inactive genotype, that accommodates different possibilities that can be activated or deactivated. Results show that adaption with standard NSGA-II greatly reduces the number of evaluations required for optimization to a target goal, while the proposed variants further improve the adaption costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:07:50Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Multi-objective and multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization of laser-plasma acceleration [0.0]
  We present first results on multi-objective optimization of a simulated laser-plasma accelerator. We find that multi-objective optimization is equal or even superior in performance to its single-objective counterparts. We significantly reduce the computational costs of the optimization by choosing the resolution and box size of the simulations dynamically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T12:09:09Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Search Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization [40.40632890861706]
  We consider the problem of multi-objective (MO) blackbox optimization using expensive function evaluations. We propose a novel uncertainty-aware search framework referred to as USeMO to efficiently select the sequence of inputs for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T16:50:48Z)
• A Robust Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Framework Considering Input Uncertainty [0.0]
  In real-life applications like engineering design, the designer often wants to take multiple objectives as well as input uncertainty into account. We introduce a novel Bayesian optimization framework to efficiently perform multi-objective optimization considering input uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T17:45:26Z)
• Multi-Fidelity Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization: An Output Space Entropy Search Approach [44.25245545568633]
  We study the novel problem of blackbox optimization of multiple objectives via multi-fidelity function evaluations. Our experiments on several synthetic and real-world benchmark problems show that MF-OSEMO, with both approximations, significantly improves over the state-of-the-art single-fidelity algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T06:59:04Z)
• Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural Networks [19.699020509495437]
  In many applications, the objective function can be evaluated at multiple fidelities to enable a trade-off between the cost and accuracy. We propose Deep Neural Network Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization (DNN-MFBO) that can flexibly capture all kinds of complicated relationships between the fidelities. We show the advantages of our method in both synthetic benchmark datasets and real-world applications in engineering design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-06T23:28:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.