Where is my Glass Slipper? AI, Poetry and Art

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05781v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:57:03 GMT
• Title: Where is my Glass Slipper? AI, Poetry and Art
• Authors: Anastasios P. Pagiaslis,
• Abstract summary: This literature review interrogates the intersections between artificial intelligence, poetry, and art.<n>It traces the development of computer-generated poetry from early template-based systems to generative models.<n>Review calls for a re-evaluation of creative processes that recognises the interdependence of technological innovation and human subjectivity.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This literature review interrogates the intersections between artificial intelligence, poetry, and art, offering a comprehensive exploration of both historical evolution and current debates in digital creative practices. It traces the development of computer-generated poetry from early template-based systems to generative models, critically assessing evaluative frameworks such as adaptations of the Turing Test, the FACE model, and ProFTAP. It also examines how these frameworks endeavour to measure creativity, semantic coherence, and cultural relevance in AI-generated texts, whilst highlighting the persistent challenges in replicating the nuance of human poetic expression. The review contributes a Marketing Theory discussion that deconstructs the figurative marketing narratives employed by AI companies, which utilise sanitised language and anthropomorphic metaphors to humanise their technologies. This discussion reveals the reductive nature of such narratives and underscores the tension between algorithmic precision and the realities of human creativity.The review also incorporates an auto-ethnographic account that offers a self-reflexive commentary on its own composition. By acknowledging the use of AI in crafting this review, the auto-ethnographic account destabilises conventional notions of authorship and objectivity, resonating with deconstruction and challenging logocentric assumptions in academic discourse. Ultimately, the review calls for a re-evaluation of creative processes that recognises the interdependence of technological innovation and human subjectivity. It advocates for interdisciplinary dialogue addressing ethical, cultural, and philosophical concerns, while reimagining the boundaries of artistic production.

Related papers

• The Art of Generative Narrativity [0.0]
  generative AI leads to experiments with non-verbal forms that have the potential to incite narratives through the audience's experience.<n>In five central sections, we discuss interrelated exemplars whose conceptual frameworks anticipate or underscore the issues of contemporary linguistic automation.<n>In closing sections, we summarize the expressive features of these exemplars and underline their value for critically assessing generative AI's cultural influence and fallouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T12:58:24Z)
• Incidental Reverberations: Poetic Similarities in AI Art [0.0]
  I argue that expressive similarities in AI art are as detrimental to its cultural value as they are avoidable.<n>My critique takes the well-informed autonomy of expression and the socially responsible freedom of creative thinking to indicate some of AI art's related issues and challenges induced by its entanglements with AI science, technology, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:19:37Z)
• Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art [0.0]
  I present a framework for the critical exploration of AI art.<n>I focus on the works that exemplify poetic complexity.<n>I outline the prospective strategies to advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T12:03:13Z)
• A Unified Spoken Language Model with Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking for Human-like Interaction [50.05919688888947]
  This paper presents a unified spoken language model for emotional intelligence, enhanced by a novel data construction strategy termed Injected Emotional-Attribution Thinking (IEAT)<n>IEAT incorporates user emotional states and their underlying causes into the model's internal reasoning process, enabling emotion-aware reasoning to be internalized rather than treated as explicit supervision.<n> Experiments on the Human-like Spoken Dialogue Systems Challenge (HumDial) Emotional Intelligence benchmark demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves top-ranked performance across emotional trajectory modeling, emotional reasoning, and empathetic response generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T14:07:30Z)
• Aesthetic Experience and Educational Value in Co-creating Art with Generative AI: Evidence from a Survey of Young Learners [1.9863718017611578]
  This study investigates the aesthetic experience and educational value of collaborative artmaking with generative artificial intelligence (AI) among young learners and art students.<n>Based on a survey of 112 participants, we examine how human creators renegotiate their roles, how conventional notions of originality are challenged, and how aesthetic judgment is formed in human--AI co-creation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T17:55:46Z)
• Form-Substance Discrimination: Concept, Cognition, and Pedagogy [55.2480439325792]
  This paper examines form-substance discrimination as an essential learning outcome for curriculum development in higher education. We propose practical strategies for fostering this ability through curriculum design, assessment practices, and explicit instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T04:15:56Z)
• Towards Responsible AI Music: an Investigation of Trustworthy Features for Creative Systems [1.976667849039851]
  Generative AI is radically changing the creative arts, by fundamentally transforming the way we create and interact with cultural artefacts. This technology also raises ethical, societal, and legal concerns. Key among these are the potential displacement of human creativity, copyright infringement stemming from vast training datasets, and the lack of transparency, explainability, and fairness mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:54:47Z)
• Synthetic media and computational capitalism: towards a critical theory of artificial intelligence [0.0]
  I argue that we need new critical methods capable of addressing both the technical specificity of AI systems and their role in restructuring forms of life under computational capitalism. The paper concludes by suggesting that critical reflexivity is needed to engage with the algorithmic condition without being subsumed by it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T22:59:28Z)
• Generative AI and Creative Work: Narratives, Values, and Impacts [37.23689790286169]
  We review online media outlets and analyze the dominant narratives around AI's impact on creative work that they convey.<n>We find that the discourse promotes creativity freed from its material realisation through human labor.<n>This discourse tends to correspond to the dominant techno-positivist vision and to assert power over the creative economy and culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T10:26:56Z)
• "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
  We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools. Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation. Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z)
• Mimetic Poet [6.999740786886536]
  This paper presents the design and initial assessment of a novel device that uses generative AI to facilitate creative ideation. The device allows participants to compose short poetic texts by physically placing words on the device's surface. Upon composing the text, the system employs a large language model (LLM) to generate a response, displayed on an e-ink screen.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T02:50:15Z)
• Toward an Artist-Centred AI [0.0]
  This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts. It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T09:43:23Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
• Foundational Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook [151.49434496615427]
  Vision systems to see and reason about the compositional nature of visual scenes are fundamental to understanding our world. The models learned to bridge the gap between such modalities coupled with large-scale training data facilitate contextual reasoning, generalization, and prompt capabilities at test time. The output of such models can be modified through human-provided prompts without retraining, e.g., segmenting a particular object by providing a bounding box, having interactive dialogues by asking questions about an image or video scene or manipulating the robot's behavior through language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:59:18Z)
• Structured Like a Language Model: Analysing AI as an Automated Subject [0.0]
  We argue the intentional fictional projection of subjectivity onto large language models can yield an alternate frame through which AI behaviour can be analysed. We trace a brief history of language models, culminating in the releases of systems that realise state-of-the-art natural language processing performance. We conclude that critical media methods and psychoanalytic theory together offer a productive frame for grasping the powerful new capacities of AI-driven language systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T21:58:43Z)
• Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
  We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right. In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations. We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z)
• From Textual Experiments to Experimental Texts: Expressive Repetition in "Artificial Intelligence Literature" [0.0]
  AI literature integrates primitive problems including machine thinking, text generation, and machine creativity. In the early stage, the mutual support between technological path and artistic ideas turned out to be a failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-07T02:44:58Z)
• BACON: Deep-Learning Powered AI for Poetry Generation with Author Linguistic Style Transfer [91.3755431537592]
  This paper describes BACON, a prototype of an automatic poetry generator with author linguistic style transfer. It combines concepts and techniques from finite state machinery, probabilistic models, artificial neural networks and deep learning, to write original poetry with rich aesthetic-qualities in the style of any given author.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T00:08:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.