Exploring Multimodal Perception in Large Language Models Through Perceptual Strength Ratings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06980v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 06:52:35 GMT
• Title: Exploring Multimodal Perception in Large Language Models Through Perceptual Strength Ratings
• Authors: Jonghyun Lee, Dojun Park, Jiwoo Lee, Hoekeon Choi, Sung-Eun Lee,
• Abstract summary: The research compared GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and GPT-4o-mini, highlighting the influence of multimodal inputs on grounding and linguistic reasoning.<n>GPT-4 and GPT-4o demonstrated strong alignment with human evaluations and significant advancements over smaller models.<n>GPT-4o did not exhibit superior grounding compared to GPT-4, raising questions about their role in improving human-like grounding.
• Score: 2.539879170527831
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigated the multimodal perception of large language models (LLMs), focusing on their ability to capture human-like perceptual strength ratings across sensory modalities. Utilizing perceptual strength ratings as a benchmark, the research compared GPT-3.5, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and GPT-4o-mini, highlighting the influence of multimodal inputs on grounding and linguistic reasoning. While GPT-4 and GPT-4o demonstrated strong alignment with human evaluations and significant advancements over smaller models, qualitative analyses revealed distinct differences in processing patterns, such as multisensory overrating and reliance on loose semantic associations. Despite integrating multimodal capabilities, GPT-4o did not exhibit superior grounding compared to GPT-4, raising questions about their role in improving human-like grounding. These findings underscore how LLMs' reliance on linguistic patterns can both approximate and diverge from human embodied cognition, revealing limitations in replicating sensory experiences.

Related papers

• Investigating Large Language Models in Inferring Personality Traits from User Conversations [5.705775078773656]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are demonstrating remarkable human like capabilities across diverse domains.<n>This study evaluates whether GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini, can infer Big Five personality traits and generate BFI-10 item scores from user conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T18:09:58Z)
• From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs [12.199629860735195]
  We compare GPT4 with supervised models and or humans in three aspects: agreement with human annotations, alignment with human perception, and impact on model training. We find that common metrics that use aggregated human annotations as ground truth can underestimate the performance, of GPT-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T05:50:15Z)
• Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency [3.161954199291541]
  This research study comprehensively evaluates the language, vision, speech, and multimodal capabilities of GPT-4o. GPT-4o demonstrates high accuracy and efficiency across multiple domains in language and reasoning capabilities. The model shows variability and faces limitations in handling complex and ambiguous inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T19:00:21Z)
• Human vs. LMMs: Exploring the Discrepancy in Emoji Interpretation and Usage in Digital Communication [68.40865217231695]
  This study examines the behavior of GPT-4V in replicating human-like use of emojis. The findings reveal a discernible discrepancy between human and GPT-4V behaviors, likely due to the subjective nature of human interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T08:56:52Z)
• MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation [60.65820977963331]
  We introduce a novel evaluation paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs) This paradigm shifts the emphasis from result-oriented assessments, which often neglect the reasoning process, to a more comprehensive evaluation. By applying this paradigm in the GSM8K dataset, we have developed the MR-GSM8K benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T15:49:43Z)
• Gemini vs GPT-4V: A Preliminary Comparison and Combination of Vision-Language Models Through Qualitative Cases [98.35348038111508]
  This paper presents an in-depth comparative study of two pioneering models: Google's Gemini and OpenAI's GPT-4V(ision) The core of our analysis delves into the distinct visual comprehension abilities of each model. Our findings illuminate the unique strengths and niches of both models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T18:59:58Z)
• GPT-4 Surpassing Human Performance in Linguistic Pragmatics [0.0]
  This study investigates the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to comprehend and interpret linguistic pragmatics. Using Grice's communication principles, LLMs and human subjects were evaluated based on their responses to various dialogue-based tasks. The findings revealed the superior performance and speed of LLMs, particularly GPT4, over human subjects in interpreting pragmatics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:40:15Z)
• GPT-4V(ision) as a Generalist Evaluator for Vision-Language Tasks [70.98062518872999]
  We validate GPT-4V's capabilities for evaluation purposes, addressing tasks ranging from foundational image-to-text and text-to-image synthesis to high-level image-to-image translations and multi-images to text alignment. Notably, GPT-4V shows promising agreement with humans across various tasks and evaluation methods, demonstrating immense potential for multi-modal LLMs as evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T16:11:09Z)
• The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision) [121.42924593374127]
  We analyze the latest model, GPT-4V, to deepen the understanding of LMMs. GPT-4V's unprecedented ability in processing arbitrarily interleaved multimodal inputs makes it a powerful multimodal generalist system. GPT-4V's unique capability of understanding visual markers drawn on input images can give rise to new human-computer interaction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:34:51Z)
• Instructed to Bias: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Exhibit Emergent Cognitive Bias [57.42417061979399]
  Recent studies show that instruction tuning (IT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) improve the abilities of large language models (LMs) dramatically. In this work, we investigate the effect of IT and RLHF on decision making and reasoning in LMs. Our findings highlight the presence of these biases in various models from the GPT-3, Mistral, and T5 families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T01:39:25Z)
• Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
  This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models. Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z)
• Does Conceptual Representation Require Embodiment? Insights From Large Language Models [9.390117546307042]
  We compare representations of 4,442 lexical concepts between humans and ChatGPTs (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) We identify two main findings: 1) Both models strongly align with human representations in non-sensorimotor domains but lag in sensory and motor areas, with GPT-4 outperforming GPT-3.5; 2) GPT-4's gains are associated with its additional visual learning, which also appears to benefit related dimensions like haptics and imageability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T15:06:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.